本文選題：國(guó)有資本 + 收益分配��； 參考：《華東政法大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國(guó)是以公有制經(jīng)濟(jì)為基礎(chǔ)的社會(huì)主義國(guó)家，國(guó)有資產(chǎn)投入生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營(yíng)后形成國(guó)有資本，運(yùn)營(yíng)產(chǎn)生的收益極為可觀(guān)。面對(duì)這筆巨大的財(cái)富，如何分配成為一大難題。近年來(lái)，我國(guó)越來(lái)越重視國(guó)有資本收益的分配，通過(guò)擴(kuò)大分配范圍和提高上繳比例不斷改進(jìn)分配。除了技術(shù)性規(guī)則，更需以法律規(guī)范的形式對(duì)其進(jìn)行規(guī)制。目前我國(guó)專(zhuān)家、學(xué)者對(duì)國(guó)有資本收益分配的研究多偏向經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)、制度學(xué)和社會(huì)學(xué)，法學(xué)角度研究較少，然而法律體系的建立與完善對(duì)于國(guó)有資本收益分配而言必不可少，故筆者選擇了這個(gè)主題，希望了解我國(guó)國(guó)有資本收益分配法律制度的現(xiàn)狀及不足，對(duì)比國(guó)外做法并加以借鑒，，為我國(guó)國(guó)有資本收益分配法律制度的完善建言獻(xiàn)策。 本文除了導(dǎo)言和結(jié)語(yǔ)外，正文共分為四章，各章的具體內(nèi)容如下： 第一章對(duì)國(guó)有資本收益分配的相關(guān)概念進(jìn)行了對(duì)比和界定，將研究范圍限定為國(guó)有資本即經(jīng)營(yíng)性國(guó)有資產(chǎn)，以此為切入點(diǎn)，明確了國(guó)有資本收益的性質(zhì)及來(lái)源，強(qiáng)調(diào)國(guó)有資本收益分配在保障國(guó)家所有者權(quán)益和宏觀(guān)調(diào)控方面的作用。之后，介紹了該制度在我國(guó)的歷史演變，此外，著重從我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)、法制和社會(huì)方面分析了完善該制度的必然性和可行性，為后文制度考察奠定前提和基礎(chǔ)。 第二章從不同的角度對(duì)國(guó)有資本收益分配制度的理論基礎(chǔ)進(jìn)行了深入剖析。產(chǎn)權(quán)理論明確了國(guó)有企業(yè)所有權(quán)和經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)相分離，劃分了國(guó)家和企業(yè)的法律地位。分配正義理論是從宏觀(guān)層面上的財(cái)政分配角度出發(fā)，為國(guó)有資本收益分配技術(shù)性規(guī)定的調(diào)整指明了方向，以實(shí)現(xiàn)機(jī)會(huì)、規(guī)則、過(guò)程和結(jié)果公平。 第三章是在了解我國(guó)現(xiàn)有國(guó)有資本收益分配法律規(guī)范和在實(shí)踐中的分配情況的基礎(chǔ)上，對(duì)該制度進(jìn)行全方位考察，從法律體系、配套制度和監(jiān)督機(jī)制三個(gè)角度對(duì)這一制度進(jìn)行檢討，發(fā)現(xiàn)缺陷與不足，并指出問(wèn)題存在的根源。 第四章有針對(duì)性地介紹了國(guó)外的國(guó)有資本收益分配制度，對(duì)其進(jìn)行比較和借鑒，對(duì)我國(guó)國(guó)有資本收益分配法律制度和配套產(chǎn)權(quán)制度、預(yù)算制度的構(gòu)建和完善提出了自己的想法。 本文的創(chuàng)新之處在于：其一，將法學(xué)理論與制度學(xué)研究相融合，從宏觀(guān)層面出發(fā)，貫徹民主法治和公平正義原則。堅(jiān)持從法學(xué)的角度審視我國(guó)國(guó)有資本收益分配法律制度，并輔之以產(chǎn)權(quán)制度和國(guó)有資本經(jīng)營(yíng)預(yù)算制度研究，之前二者大都是分離的；其二，綜合運(yùn)用了歷史分析法、比較分析法和實(shí)證分析法，通過(guò)研究我國(guó)該制度的歷史沿革，分析和比較東西方相關(guān)理論、各國(guó)國(guó)有資本收益分配制度，統(tǒng)計(jì)和總結(jié)該制度在我國(guó)施行時(shí)可能會(huì)出現(xiàn)的情況，了解我國(guó)現(xiàn)行法律制度中的問(wèn)題。 由于時(shí)間有限及資料搜集上的困難，本文仍存在很多不足：第一，相關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)和資料獲取困難。國(guó)內(nèi)官方公布信息不足，部分來(lái)源于網(wǎng)絡(luò)資源，國(guó)外制度考察缺少原文資料，多參考現(xiàn)有學(xué)者的介紹，缺乏權(quán)威性，研究結(jié)論存在瑕疵；第二，筆者欠缺經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)和制度學(xué)知識(shí)儲(chǔ)備，提出的建議較為宏觀(guān)，實(shí)踐操作性較為欠缺；第三，關(guān)于產(chǎn)權(quán)制度、國(guó)有資本經(jīng)營(yíng)預(yù)算制度等配套制度，由于篇幅有限，僅作簡(jiǎn)略介紹。
[Abstract]:Our country is a socialist country based on the public ownership economy, and the state assets are invested in the production and operation of state-owned capital, and the profits of the operation are very considerable. In the face of this huge wealth, how to distribute the state capital has become a big problem. In recent years, our country has paid more and more attention to the distribution of the income of the state capital, by expanding the distribution scope and raising the upper part. In addition to technical rules, it is more necessary to regulate it in the form of legal norms. At present, Chinese experts and scholars have studied the income distribution of state-owned capital mostly in economics, institutions and sociology, and less in jurisprudence. However, the establishment and improvement of the legal system for the distribution of the income of state-owned capital is concerned. Therefore, the author chose this topic, hoping to understand the current situation and deficiency of the legal system of the distribution of state capital income in our country, contrast the foreign practice and draw lessons from it, and offer suggestions for the perfection of the legal system of the distribution of state capital income in our country.
In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the text is divided into four chapters. The specific contents of each chapter are as follows:
The first chapter compares and defines the related concepts of the income distribution of state-owned capital, and defines the scope of the study as state-owned capital, that is, the state-owned capital, that is, the nature and source of the income of the state capital, and emphasizes the role of the distribution of state capital income in the protection of the rights and interests of the state owners and the macro regulation and control. This paper introduces the historical evolution of the system in China, and analyzes the inevitability and feasibility of perfecting the system from the economic, legal and social aspects of our country, and lays the foundation for the investigation of the later system.
The second chapter makes an in-depth analysis of the theoretical basis of the system of state capital income distribution from different angles. The theory of property rights clearly separates the ownership of state-owned enterprises from the management right and divides the legal status of the state and enterprise. The adjustment of operative requirements pointed out the direction to achieve opportunities, rules, processes and results fair.
The third chapter, on the basis of understanding the existing legal norms and distribution of the current state capital income distribution in China, carries out a comprehensive review of the system and reviews the system from the three angles of the legal system, the supporting system and the supervision mechanism, and finds the defects and imperfection, and points out the root cause of the problem.
The fourth chapter introduces the foreign state capital income distribution system in foreign countries, compares and uses it for reference, and puts forward his own ideas on the construction and improvement of the legal system of the income distribution of state-owned capital and the system of supporting property rights, and the improvement of the budget system.
The innovation of this article lies in the following: firstly, it integrates legal theory with institutional research, and carries out the principle of democratic rule of law and fairness and justice from the macro level, and examines the legal system of the income distribution of China's state-owned capital from the perspective of law, supplemented by the study of the property right system and the capital management budget system of the country, and most of the previous two It is separate; secondly, it uses historical analysis method, comparative analysis method and empirical analysis method to analyze and compare the historical evolution of the system in China, analyze and compare the related theories of East and West, state capital income distribution system in various countries, statistics and summarize the possible situation when the system is implemented in our country, and understand the current legal system of our country. The problem in the degree.
Due to the difficulty of time and data collection, there are still a lot of shortcomings in this paper: first, the related data and data are difficult to obtain. The official publication of information in China, partly from the network resources, the lack of the original information from the foreign system, the introduction of the existing scholars, the lack of authority, and the defects of the research conclusions; second, pen. The lack of economic and institutional knowledge reserves, the proposed suggestions are more macro, the practical operability is relatively short; third, the property rights system, the state-owned capital management budget system and other supporting systems, due to limited length, only briefly introduced.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D922.291

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 林崗,張宇;產(chǎn)權(quán)分析的兩種范式[J];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué);2000年01期

本文編號(hào)：2076068