本文選題：刑事訴訟 + 非法證據(jù)��； 參考：《暨南大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：證據(jù)是刑事訴訟活動的關(guān)鍵和核心，完善且具有可操作性的非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則對保障犯罪嫌疑人和被告人權(quán)利、遏制非法取證行為、實(shí)現(xiàn)司法正義具有重要的意義。本次《中華人民共和國刑事訴訟法》（以下稱“《刑事訴訟法》”）1修改是我國社會主義民主法制建設(shè)的又一重大成就�！缎淌略V訟法》這部有著“小憲法”之稱的部門法的全面修改所帶來的社會影響是廣泛而深遠(yuǎn)的，從立法上對2010年頒布施行的《關(guān)于辦理死刑案件審查判斷證據(jù)若干問題的規(guī)定》和《關(guān)于辦理刑事案件排除非法證據(jù)若干問題的規(guī)定》（以下稱“兩證據(jù)規(guī)定”）其中相關(guān)內(nèi)容提升到基本法律的層面。本文論述了公安機(jī)關(guān)在刑事司法實(shí)踐中，必須準(zhǔn)確把握排除非法證據(jù)的范圍和程序，樹立正確的執(zhí)法理念，進(jìn)一步落實(shí)強(qiáng)化相關(guān)配套工作，確保嚴(yán)格準(zhǔn)確而有效地適用訴訟法律加強(qiáng)打擊犯罪。筆者在全面深入學(xué)習(xí)新法的基礎(chǔ)上，從介紹非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則的起源出發(fā)，嘗試闡述非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則的運(yùn)行方式和證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn)等問題，并結(jié)合自身工作實(shí)踐，小結(jié)幾點(diǎn)新法實(shí)施后非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則將帶給公安機(jī)關(guān)最突出的挑戰(zhàn)，提出了幾點(diǎn)不成熟的建議，，權(quán)當(dāng)拋磚引玉，希望籍此引起廣大同行對新法的學(xué)習(xí)和討論興趣，為執(zhí)法實(shí)踐提供參考。
[Abstract]:Evidence is the key and core of criminal proceedings. It is of great significance to perfect and operate the rule of exclusion of illegal evidence to protect the rights of criminal suspects and defendants, to curb illegal evidence collection and to realize judicial justice. This revision of the Criminal procedure Law of the people's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as "Criminal procedure Law") is another major achievement in the construction of socialist democracy and legal system in China. The social impact of the comprehensive revision of the law is widespread and far-reaching. Legislative provisions on certain issues concerning the examination and judgment of evidence in handling death penalty cases promulgated and enforced in 2010 and provisions on the exclusion of certain issues of illegal evidence from handling Criminal cases (hereinafter referred to as the "two evidence provisions") The relevant content is raised to the level of basic law. This paper discusses that in the practice of criminal justice, the public security organs must accurately grasp the scope and procedure of excluding illegal evidence, set up a correct concept of law enforcement, and further implement and strengthen the relevant supporting work. To ensure strict, accurate and effective application of litigation law to strengthen the fight against crime. On the basis of comprehensive and in-depth study of the new law, starting from the introduction of the origin of the rule of exclusion of illegal evidence, the author tries to expound the operation mode and standard of proof of the rule of exclusion of illegal evidence, and combines with his own work practice. After the implementation of the new law, the exclusion rules of illegal evidence will bring the most outstanding challenges to the public security organs. They have put forward some immature suggestions, and they hope to arouse the interest of the vast number of colleagues in the study and discussion of the new law. It provides reference for law enforcement practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：暨南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 肖晗;非法證據(jù)的范圍界定[J];湖湘論壇;2003年02期

2 吳高慶;;論我國非法證據(jù)排除程序的完善[J];浙江工商大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2011年04期

本文編號：1957832