本文選題：刑事訴訟 + 近親屬作證��； 參考：《鄭州大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：刑事訴訟近親屬作證特免權(quán)作為刑事訴訟追究犯罪與其它重要的社會(huì)價(jià)值相權(quán)衡的結(jié)果,是現(xiàn)代法治國(guó)家賦予近親屬證人就特定情況下免予作證的一項(xiàng)重要權(quán)利。作為證人作證義務(wù)的例外,賦予近親屬作證特免權(quán)符合人性的基本需要,符合社會(huì)的基本倫理道德觀念。 刑事訴訟中近親屬作證特免權(quán)制度在古今中外都有著漫長(zhǎng)的發(fā)展歷程。在我國(guó)古代,封建宗法制度下的“親親相隱制度”在一定程度上體現(xiàn)了近親屬作證特免權(quán)的刑事司法理念。同時(shí),在英美法系與大陸法系許多國(guó)家和地區(qū)的法律也都不同程度的規(guī)定了有關(guān)親屬作證特免權(quán)的相關(guān)內(nèi)容。然而,建國(guó)之后,由于歷史原因、社會(huì)政治環(huán)境及立法技術(shù)等因素的制約,將近親屬作證特免權(quán)也視為應(yīng)當(dāng)革除的封建社會(huì)遺留產(chǎn)物,在立法上徹底廢除了該項(xiàng)制度。隨著改革開(kāi)放的推進(jìn)和社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展,法治越來(lái)越受到重視,法學(xué)研究也取得飛速的發(fā)展。在經(jīng)過(guò)長(zhǎng)時(shí)間的實(shí)踐考察與研究后,發(fā)現(xiàn)近親屬作證特免權(quán)并不必然與現(xiàn)代法治與民主精神相違背。相反其不但符合基本的家庭論文道德觀念,而且符合現(xiàn)代社會(huì)人權(quán)保障理念,提高人權(quán)保障水平。因此,在我國(guó)面臨社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型,傳統(tǒng)的親情和家庭倫理觀念受到?jīng)_擊的當(dāng)下,構(gòu)建刑事訴訟近親屬作證特免權(quán)制度有重要的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。 本文首先對(duì)刑事訴訟近親屬作證特免權(quán)制度概念進(jìn)行闡述,將其與證人資格作證豁免權(quán)等相關(guān)概念進(jìn)行對(duì)比分析,理清了近親屬作證特免權(quán)的含義。并指出了近親屬作證特免權(quán)制度存在的理論基礎(chǔ)。其次,在對(duì)英美法系國(guó)家、大陸法系國(guó)家以及我國(guó)港澳臺(tái)地區(qū)有關(guān)刑事訴訟近親屬作證特免權(quán)問(wèn)題的立法與司法實(shí)踐進(jìn)行考察、分析,希冀找到構(gòu)建我國(guó)刑事訴訟近親屬作證特免權(quán)制度的借鑒之處。再次,從我國(guó)傳統(tǒng)法律文化中的親親相隱制度入手,對(duì)古代親親相隱制度的起源與發(fā)展及其與現(xiàn)代刑事訴訟近親屬作證特免權(quán)制度之區(qū)別等方面來(lái)論述,指出“親親相隱”對(duì)建構(gòu)近親屬作證特免權(quán)的啟示。 最后,在對(duì)域外相關(guān)制度的考察和我國(guó)古代相關(guān)規(guī)定分析的基礎(chǔ)上,提出我國(guó)刑事訴訟近親屬作證特免權(quán)制度的具體構(gòu)建措施。指出在構(gòu)建過(guò)程中應(yīng)當(dāng)堅(jiān)持利益權(quán)衡原則、不得侵害他人利益原則、罪責(zé)刑相適應(yīng)原則。在具體制度的構(gòu)建時(shí)應(yīng)當(dāng)明確近親屬作證特免權(quán)是一項(xiàng)程序性權(quán)利,其適用的主體也應(yīng)當(dāng)有所限制并且需要經(jīng)過(guò)申請(qǐng)、審核等相關(guān)程序,設(shè)置相關(guān)的救濟(jì)措施。此外,作為證人作證義務(wù)的例外,該制度的適用也有例外的情形。
[Abstract]:As the result of the balance between the criminal prosecution and other important social values, the privilege of immunity of near relatives testifying in criminal proceedings is an important right granted by the modern rule of law country to the near relatives witnesses to be exempted from testifying under certain circumstances. As an exception to witness's duty to testify, it accords with the basic needs of human nature and the basic ethical and moral concept of society to grant the right of immunity to near relatives to testify. The special exemption system of near relatives testifying in criminal proceedings has a long process of development at all times and all over the world. In ancient China, the system of "close relatives hiding" under the feudal patriarchal system reflected to a certain extent the criminal judicial idea of the special exemption right of near relatives to testify. At the same time, in many countries and regions of Anglo-American law system and civil law system, the relevant contents of the privilege of relatives testifying are stipulated to some extent. However, after the founding of the people's Republic of China, due to historical reasons, social and political environment, legislative technology and other factors, the right of near relatives to testify and exempt was regarded as a legacy of feudal society that should be removed, and the system was completely abolished in legislation. With the promotion of reform and opening up and the development of social economy, more and more attention has been paid to the rule of law, and legal research has also made rapid development. After a long period of practical investigation and research, it is found that the privilege of near relatives testifying is not necessarily against the modern rule of law and the spirit of democracy. On the contrary, it not only accords with the basic family moral concept, but also accords with the modern social human rights guarantee concept and improves the level of human rights protection. Therefore, in the face of social transformation and the impact of traditional family ethics, it is of great practical significance to construct the special exemption system of the right of close relatives to testify in criminal proceedings. This paper first expounds the concept of privilege system of near relatives testifying in criminal proceedings, compares it with related concepts such as immunity of witness qualification and testifying, and clarifies the meaning of privilege of near relatives to testify. It also points out the theoretical basis of the special exemption system of near relatives testifying. Secondly, in the Anglo-American law countries, the civil law countries as well as our country Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan area about the criminal procedure near relative testifying special exemption question legislation and the judicial practice, carries on the investigation, the analysis, The author hopes to find the reference for constructing the special exemption system of near relatives testifying in criminal procedure in our country. Thirdly, from the traditional legal culture of our country, the author discusses the origin and development of the ancient system of closeness between relatives and relatives, and the difference between the system of special exemption from the right to testify by close relatives in modern criminal proceedings, and so on. The author points out the enlightenment of "close relatives' concealment" to the construction of the special immunity right of close relatives to testify. Finally, on the basis of the investigation of the extraterritorial related system and the analysis of the relevant regulations in ancient China, the author puts forward the concrete construction measures of the special exemption system of the right of near relatives to testify in our criminal procedure. It is pointed out that the principle of balancing interests should be adhered to, the principle of interests of others should not be infringed, and the principle of adaptation of crime, responsibility and punishment should be adhered to. In the construction of the specific system, it should be clear that the right of special exemption of near relatives to testify is a procedural right, and its applicable subject should also be limited and need to apply, review and other relevant procedures, set up relevant relief measures. In addition, as an exception to witness's duty to testify, there are exceptions to the application of this system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張本順;;親屬拒證權(quán)的人倫精神解讀[J];道德與文明;2008年06期

2 李成;李紹燕;;論親屬拒證權(quán)[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年02期

3 劉娟娟;;親屬拒絕作證權(quán)的立法分析[J];法制與社會(huì);2012年10期

4 章禮明;親屬拒證權(quán)制度比較研究[J];河北法學(xué);2005年03期

5 張本順;;刑事訴訟中的親屬拒證權(quán)制度研究[J];河北法學(xué);2008年10期

6 劉小瓊;;親屬拒證特權(quán)的法經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析[J];遼寧行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年06期

7 卜禎;;論親屬拒證權(quán)的引入——由新刑事訴訟法第188條所想[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年06期

8 郭華;張玉英;;親情與法律的融合——在和諧與法治視野下探討親屬之間的拒證權(quán)[J];山東審判;2009年03期

9 張秋華;;對(duì)親屬拒證權(quán)的幾點(diǎn)補(bǔ)充[J];群文天地;2012年13期

10 張淑君;;我國(guó)《刑事訴訟法》親屬拒證權(quán)制度的具體構(gòu)建[J];中國(guó)市場(chǎng);2012年05期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 何志平;親屬拒絕作證權(quán)問(wèn)題之探討[D];安徽大學(xué);2010年

2 劉鵬飛;拒證權(quán)制度比較研究[D];中共中央黨校;2005年

3 史光磊;刑事訴訟拒證權(quán)研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2006年

4 程海霞;刑事訴訟中的證人作證特免權(quán)制度研究[D];安徽大學(xué);2006年

5 祁?lèi)?ài)莉;拒證權(quán)研究[D];廈門(mén)大學(xué);2006年

6 孫晶;親屬作證特免權(quán)研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2008年

7 錢(qián)興紅;刑事證人拒證權(quán)研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2008年

8 李慧;親屬特免權(quán)制度研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2010年

9 龔劍;刑事訴訟中的證人拒證權(quán)制度研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2010年

10 廖滿(mǎn)棠;論構(gòu)建我國(guó)的刑事訴訟親屬作證特免權(quán)制度[D];華南理工大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：1955037