本文選題：刑事訴訟 + 近親屬作證��； 參考：《鄭州大學》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：刑事訴訟近親屬作證特免權作為刑事訴訟追究犯罪與其它重要的社會價值相權衡的結果,是現(xiàn)代法治國家賦予近親屬證人就特定情況下免予作證的一項重要權利。作為證人作證義務的例外,賦予近親屬作證特免權符合人性的基本需要,符合社會的基本倫理道德觀念。 刑事訴訟中近親屬作證特免權制度在古今中外都有著漫長的發(fā)展歷程。在我國古代,封建宗法制度下的“親親相隱制度”在一定程度上體現(xiàn)了近親屬作證特免權的刑事司法理念。同時,在英美法系與大陸法系許多國家和地區(qū)的法律也都不同程度的規(guī)定了有關親屬作證特免權的相關內容。然而,建國之后,由于歷史原因、社會政治環(huán)境及立法技術等因素的制約,將近親屬作證特免權也視為應當革除的封建社會遺留產物,在立法上徹底廢除了該項制度。隨著改革開放的推進和社會經濟的發(fā)展,法治越來越受到重視,法學研究也取得飛速的發(fā)展。在經過長時間的實踐考察與研究后,發(fā)現(xiàn)近親屬作證特免權并不必然與現(xiàn)代法治與民主精神相違背。相反其不但符合基本的家庭論文道德觀念,而且符合現(xiàn)代社會人權保障理念,提高人權保障水平。因此,在我國面臨社會轉型,傳統(tǒng)的親情和家庭倫理觀念受到沖擊的當下,構建刑事訴訟近親屬作證特免權制度有重要的現(xiàn)實意義。 本文首先對刑事訴訟近親屬作證特免權制度概念進行闡述,將其與證人資格作證豁免權等相關概念進行對比分析,理清了近親屬作證特免權的含義。并指出了近親屬作證特免權制度存在的理論基礎。其次,在對英美法系國家、大陸法系國家以及我國港澳臺地區(qū)有關刑事訴訟近親屬作證特免權問題的立法與司法實踐進行考察、分析,希冀找到構建我國刑事訴訟近親屬作證特免權制度的借鑒之處。再次,從我國傳統(tǒng)法律文化中的親親相隱制度入手,對古代親親相隱制度的起源與發(fā)展及其與現(xiàn)代刑事訴訟近親屬作證特免權制度之區(qū)別等方面來論述,指出“親親相隱”對建構近親屬作證特免權的啟示。 最后,在對域外相關制度的考察和我國古代相關規(guī)定分析的基礎上,提出我國刑事訴訟近親屬作證特免權制度的具體構建措施。指出在構建過程中應當堅持利益權衡原則、不得侵害他人利益原則、罪責刑相適應原則。在具體制度的構建時應當明確近親屬作證特免權是一項程序性權利,其適用的主體也應當有所限制并且需要經過申請、審核等相關程序,設置相關的救濟措施。此外,作為證人作證義務的例外,該制度的適用也有例外的情形。
[Abstract]:As the result of the balance between the criminal prosecution and other important social values, the privilege of immunity of near relatives testifying in criminal proceedings is an important right granted by the modern rule of law country to the near relatives witnesses to be exempted from testifying under certain circumstances. As an exception to witness's duty to testify, it accords with the basic needs of human nature and the basic ethical and moral concept of society to grant the right of immunity to near relatives to testify. The special exemption system of near relatives testifying in criminal proceedings has a long process of development at all times and all over the world. In ancient China, the system of "close relatives hiding" under the feudal patriarchal system reflected to a certain extent the criminal judicial idea of the special exemption right of near relatives to testify. At the same time, in many countries and regions of Anglo-American law system and civil law system, the relevant contents of the privilege of relatives testifying are stipulated to some extent. However, after the founding of the people's Republic of China, due to historical reasons, social and political environment, legislative technology and other factors, the right of near relatives to testify and exempt was regarded as a legacy of feudal society that should be removed, and the system was completely abolished in legislation. With the promotion of reform and opening up and the development of social economy, more and more attention has been paid to the rule of law, and legal research has also made rapid development. After a long period of practical investigation and research, it is found that the privilege of near relatives testifying is not necessarily against the modern rule of law and the spirit of democracy. On the contrary, it not only accords with the basic family moral concept, but also accords with the modern social human rights guarantee concept and improves the level of human rights protection. Therefore, in the face of social transformation and the impact of traditional family ethics, it is of great practical significance to construct the special exemption system of the right of close relatives to testify in criminal proceedings. This paper first expounds the concept of privilege system of near relatives testifying in criminal proceedings, compares it with related concepts such as immunity of witness qualification and testifying, and clarifies the meaning of privilege of near relatives to testify. It also points out the theoretical basis of the special exemption system of near relatives testifying. Secondly, in the Anglo-American law countries, the civil law countries as well as our country Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan area about the criminal procedure near relative testifying special exemption question legislation and the judicial practice, carries on the investigation, the analysis, The author hopes to find the reference for constructing the special exemption system of near relatives testifying in criminal procedure in our country. Thirdly, from the traditional legal culture of our country, the author discusses the origin and development of the ancient system of closeness between relatives and relatives, and the difference between the system of special exemption from the right to testify by close relatives in modern criminal proceedings, and so on. The author points out the enlightenment of "close relatives' concealment" to the construction of the special immunity right of close relatives to testify. Finally, on the basis of the investigation of the extraterritorial related system and the analysis of the relevant regulations in ancient China, the author puts forward the concrete construction measures of the special exemption system of the right of near relatives to testify in our criminal procedure. It is pointed out that the principle of balancing interests should be adhered to, the principle of interests of others should not be infringed, and the principle of adaptation of crime, responsibility and punishment should be adhered to. In the construction of the specific system, it should be clear that the right of special exemption of near relatives to testify is a procedural right, and its applicable subject should also be limited and need to apply, review and other relevant procedures, set up relevant relief measures. In addition, as an exception to witness's duty to testify, there are exceptions to the application of this system.
【學位授予單位】：鄭州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 張本順;;親屬拒證權的人倫精神解讀[J];道德與文明;2008年06期

2 李成;李紹燕;;論親屬拒證權[J];法制與社會;2010年02期

3 劉娟娟;;親屬拒絕作證權的立法分析[J];法制與社會;2012年10期

4 章禮明;親屬拒證權制度比較研究[J];河北法學;2005年03期

5 張本順;;刑事訴訟中的親屬拒證權制度研究[J];河北法學;2008年10期

6 劉小瓊;;親屬拒證特權的法經濟學分析[J];遼寧行政學院學報;2012年06期

7 卜禎;;論親屬拒證權的引入——由新刑事訴訟法第188條所想[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學院學報;2012年06期

8 郭華;張玉英;;親情與法律的融合——在和諧與法治視野下探討親屬之間的拒證權[J];山東審判;2009年03期

9 張秋華;;對親屬拒證權的幾點補充[J];群文天地;2012年13期

10 張淑君;;我國《刑事訴訟法》親屬拒證權制度的具體構建[J];中國市場;2012年05期

相關碩士學位論文 前10條

1 何志平;親屬拒絕作證權問題之探討[D];安徽大學;2010年

2 劉鵬飛;拒證權制度比較研究[D];中共中央黨校;2005年

3 史光磊;刑事訴訟拒證權研究[D];吉林大學;2006年

4 程海霞;刑事訴訟中的證人作證特免權制度研究[D];安徽大學;2006年

5 祁愛莉;拒證權研究[D];廈門大學;2006年

6 孫晶;親屬作證特免權研究[D];吉林大學;2008年

7 錢興紅;刑事證人拒證權研究[D];蘇州大學;2008年

8 李慧;親屬特免權制度研究[D];吉林大學;2010年

9 龔劍;刑事訴訟中的證人拒證權制度研究[D];復旦大學;2010年

10 廖滿棠;論構建我國的刑事訴訟親屬作證特免權制度[D];華南理工大學;2010年

，

本文編號：1955037