本文選題：行政問責 + 法律特征��； 參考：《中共中央黨校》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國行政問責實踐可以追溯到1979年“渤海2號”翻沉事故,時任石油部部長的宋振明同志請求解除其職務。2003年“非典”肆虐,行政問責制進入民眾視野,逐步發(fā)展起來。行政問責絕對不是權宜之計,而是有效提高政府公信力和行政效率的重要制度。在近幾年摸索實踐中,行政問責制度構建不斷跟進。由于理論研究和制度定位的模糊,行政問責制度的發(fā)展趨勢雖然還不明朗,但作為一項長效機制,從行政問責實踐效果和民眾反映來看,行政問責法治化是大勢所趨,民心所向。 本文在及時跟蹤行政問責實踐動向,關注行政問責理論革新的基礎上,從行政法的學科角度審視、思考行政問責制的理論土壤和制度定位,從而為行政問責制的進一步發(fā)展奠定基礎,為行政問責法治化建設探索方向。圍繞上述主題,本文從行政問責基本原理、法律特征、法制建設現(xiàn)狀、行政問責制度瓶頸、法治化路徑五部分進行探討。 第一部分作為本文開篇,首先從行政問責的概念入手,結合我國政治體制,提出了狹義行政問責的概念。這對于厘清當前學術界不同學科行政問責概念界定混亂的現(xiàn)狀起到正本清源的作用。 第二部分在厘清行政問責概念的基礎上,以行政法學的獨特視角,運用行政法基本理論深入分析行政問責制的法律特征。這是本文的一大亮點,也是重要創(chuàng)新之處。明確行政問責的法律特征,是正確指導行政問責制度建設的重要前提,是行政問責立法可行性研究的重要組成部分。 第三部分對法律、地方性法規(guī)、黨內(nèi)文件、專門問責法規(guī)等不同層面的規(guī)范性文件進行系統(tǒng)分析,梳理出我國行政問責制的淵源,也從側面反映了行政問責制度建設的歷史進程。這一部分還對部門行政問責這一新動向新趨勢進行跟蹤分析,其中對土地違法問責的學理分析是本文理論聯(lián)系實際的又一亮點。 第四部分結合當前行政問責法治建設,針對目前行政問責實踐中遇到的問題,分析了行政問責法治建設基本完善后,在發(fā)展瓶頸期所遇到的實際操作問題,并探討了問題的深層次原因,旨在提出可行性對策。 第五部分拋開當前學術界提出的脫離我國實際的問題和建議,針對前一部分提出的行政問責法治化遇到的問題,提出可行性對策,為行政問責立法提供可借鑒的路徑選擇。
[Abstract]:The practice of administrative accountability in China can be traced back to the "Bohai Sea No.2" sinking accident in 1979. Comrade Song Zhenming, then Minister of Oil, requested his dismissal. In 2003, "SARS" raged, and the administrative accountability system entered the public's field of vision and gradually developed. Administrative accountability is not an expedient measure, but an important system to effectively improve the government's credibility and administrative efficiency. In recent years, the system of administrative accountability system has been followed up in practice. Because of the ambiguity of theoretical research and system orientation, the development trend of administrative accountability system is not clear, but as a long-term mechanism, from the practical effect of administrative accountability and the reflection of the public, the rule of law of administrative accountability is the trend of the times. The people want what they want. On the basis of following up the practice trend of administrative accountability in time and paying attention to the innovation of administrative accountability theory, this paper considers the theoretical soil and system orientation of administrative accountability from the perspective of administrative law. Thus lay the foundation for the further development of the administrative accountability system and explore the direction of the legal construction of the administrative accountability system. Around the above theme, this paper discusses the basic principle of administrative accountability, legal characteristics, the current situation of legal system construction, the bottleneck of administrative accountability system, and the path of rule of law. The first part begins with the concept of administrative accountability and puts forward the concept of narrow sense of administrative accountability. This is helpful to clarify the confusion in the definition of administrative accountability in different academic disciplines. The second part, on the basis of clarifying the concept of administrative accountability, analyzes the legal characteristics of the administrative accountability system with the basic theory of administrative law from the unique perspective of administrative jurisprudence. This is one of the highlights of this article, but also an important innovation. Clarifying the legal characteristics of administrative accountability is an important prerequisite for correctly guiding the construction of administrative accountability system and an important part of the feasibility study of administrative accountability legislation. The third part systematically analyzes the normative documents at different levels, such as laws, local regulations, inner-party documents, special accountability regulations, etc., and combs out the origin of administrative accountability system in China. It also reflects the historical process of the construction of administrative accountability system. This part also carries on the trace analysis to the department administrative accountability this new trend new tendency, among them to the land illegal accountability academic principle analysis is this article theory unifies the practice another bright spot. The fourth part combined with the current administrative accountability of the rule of law construction, in view of the current problems encountered in the practice of administrative accountability, analysis of the basic improvement of the rule of law of administrative accountability, in the bottleneck period of development encountered practical operational problems, And discussed the deep level reason of the problem, aimed at putting forward the feasible countermeasure. The fifth part puts aside the problems and suggestions put forward by the current academic circles to break away from the actual situation of our country. Aiming at the problems encountered in the rule of law of administrative accountability in the former part, the author puts forward the feasible countermeasures, and provides the path choice for the legislation of administrative accountability.
【學位授予單位】：中共中央黨校
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D922.1

【引證文獻】

相關碩士學位論文 前3條

1 焦瑞;我國行政問責客體研究[D];燕山大學;2012年

2 付拓;我國行政問責法治化問題研究[D];東北財經(jīng)大學;2011年

3 李雪瓊;我國全民健身公共服務的問責制度研究[D];北京體育大學;2013年

，

本文編號：1863378