本文選題：服務(wù)型政府 + 行政責(zé)任��； 參考：《南京師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：服務(wù)型政府作為一種新型的政府治理模式,是我國(guó)在反思?xì)v史、面對(duì)現(xiàn)實(shí)問題和尋求未來發(fā)展中的新思維新探索,它內(nèi)在的包涵了法治政府、責(zé)任政府、有限政府等政府發(fā)展方向。服務(wù)型政府具有公民本位、服務(wù)導(dǎo)向、效率與公平統(tǒng)一、回應(yīng)性與前瞻性等特征,公民與政府關(guān)系的新界定是它同統(tǒng)治型政府與管制型政府的本質(zhì)區(qū)別。服務(wù)型政府的建設(shè)是一項(xiàng)宏大的系統(tǒng)工作,而政府責(zé)任即行政責(zé)任是這項(xiàng)工程的關(guān)鍵。行政責(zé)任內(nèi)涵豐富,從結(jié)構(gòu)形式上看分為政治責(zé)任、法律責(zé)任、組織責(zé)任和道德責(zé)任,不同的行政時(shí)期,行政責(zé)任各有特點(diǎn),而人民主權(quán)理論、治理與善治理論和新公共服務(wù)理論奠定了服務(wù)型政府責(zé)任的理論基礎(chǔ)。 經(jīng)濟(jì)、生態(tài)和社會(huì)的平衡可持續(xù)發(fā)展,法律保駕護(hù)航、社會(huì)文明和諧,公共服務(wù)質(zhì)量提高,社會(huì)公平正義,社會(huì)管理民主公開等已成為當(dāng)前服務(wù)型政府建設(shè)過程中凸顯出的責(zé)任內(nèi)容,是民眾對(duì)政府的強(qiáng)烈訴求。公共利益和社會(huì)公正是政府責(zé)任的價(jià)值核心和偏向,政府是公民和社會(huì)的政府,政府的一切責(zé)任指向人民,承擔(dān)起關(guān)乎人民切身利益的民生責(zé)任是政府責(zé)任重心所在,政民雙向互動(dòng)是尊重人民意愿、發(fā)揮人民的主動(dòng)性和創(chuàng)造性的基本保障。 服務(wù)型政府的責(zé)任定位是公民訴求也是政府自身的目標(biāo),但在通往目標(biāo)的路上免不了崎嶇和坎坷。傳統(tǒng)行政文化與理念的負(fù)面影響、行政人員行政責(zé)任沖突的制約、行政責(zé)任本身的制度性缺陷、公民社會(huì)發(fā)育不足等障礙導(dǎo)致了行政主體責(zé)任意識(shí)淡薄、公共服務(wù)精神缺乏、公共權(quán)力異化、行政責(zé)任對(duì)象選擇錯(cuò)誤、行政責(zé)任內(nèi)容缺失或主次顛倒等一系列行政責(zé)任失范現(xiàn)象,這是與服務(wù)政府責(zé)任定位的差距也是責(zé)任改善途中的困境。 系統(tǒng)全面的行政責(zé)任體制的構(gòu)建是確保服務(wù)型政府責(zé)任落實(shí)的關(guān)鍵途徑,樹立服務(wù)型政府行政理念、內(nèi)化行政人員的行政倫理責(zé)任、完善政府相關(guān)責(zé)任制度、合理界定政府與外部的責(zé)任關(guān)系等多維度的內(nèi)容既涵蓋了服務(wù)型政府的特征,也結(jié)合了行政責(zé)任內(nèi)外部控制的角度,是落實(shí)行政責(zé)任與構(gòu)建服務(wù)型政府的契合。
[Abstract]:As a new mode of government governance, service-oriented government is a new thinking and new exploration in reflecting on history, facing realistic problems and seeking for future development in our country. It contains the government ruled by law and the responsible government. Limited government and other government development direction. The service-oriented government has the characteristics of citizen orientation, service orientation, efficiency and fairness unity, responsiveness and foresight, etc. The new definition of the relationship between citizen and government is the essential difference between it and the ruling government and the regulatory government. The construction of service-oriented government is a great systematic work, and the responsibility of government is the key of the project. The connotation of administrative responsibility is rich, which can be divided into political responsibility, legal responsibility, organizational responsibility and moral responsibility. In different administrative periods, administrative responsibility has its own characteristics, while the theory of people's sovereignty, The theory of governance and good governance and the theory of new public service lay the theoretical foundation for the responsibility of service-oriented government. The balanced and sustainable development of economy, ecology and society, the protection of law, the harmony of social civilization, the improvement of the quality of public service, the fairness and justice of society, Democracy and openness of social management have become the responsibility content in the process of construction of service-oriented government, which is the strong appeal of the public to the government. Public interest and social justice are the value core and bias of government responsibility. The government is the government of citizen and society. All the responsibilities of government are directed to the people, and the responsibility of people's livelihood is the focus of government responsibility. The two-way interaction between the government and the people is the basic guarantee to respect the will of the people and give play to the initiative and creativity of the people. The responsibility orientation of service-oriented government is also the goal of the government itself, but the road to the goal is bumpy and bumpy. The negative influence of traditional administrative culture and idea, the restriction of administrative responsibility conflict, the institutional defect of administrative responsibility and the lack of development of civil society lead to the weak sense of responsibility of administrative subject and the lack of public service spirit. Dissimilation of public power, wrong choice of object of administrative responsibility, lack of content of administrative responsibility or reversal of primary and secondary administrative responsibility are a series of abnormal phenomena of administrative responsibility, which is the gap between the orientation of responsibility of service government and the position of responsibility of service government, which is also the dilemma on the way of responsibility improvement. The systematic and comprehensive construction of the administrative responsibility system is the key way to ensure the implementation of the service-oriented government responsibility, to establish the service-oriented government administrative concept, to internalize the administrative ethical responsibility of the administrative personnel, and to perfect the relevant responsibility system of the government. The reasonable definition of the relationship between government and external responsibility covers not only the characteristics of service-oriented government, but also the angle of internal and external control of administrative responsibility, which is the agreement between implementing administrative responsibility and constructing service-oriented government.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D630

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 謝慶奎;服務(wù)型政府建設(shè)的基本途徑:政府創(chuàng)新[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年01期

2 仰和芝;周建;;公共服務(wù)精神培育與服務(wù)型政府建設(shè)[J];當(dāng)代世界與社會(huì)主義;2009年05期

3 王永昌;深化行政審批制度改革 建設(shè)服務(wù)型政府[J];大連干部學(xué)刊;2001年05期

4 羅愷;;在打造責(zé)任政府的過程中貫徹落實(shí)科學(xué)發(fā)展觀[J];貴陽市委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2009年04期

5 劉祖云;“責(zé)任政府”及其實(shí)現(xiàn)途徑——當(dāng)代中國(guó)公共行政責(zé)任理論研究反思[J];江蘇社會(huì)科學(xué);2005年01期

6 陳征宇;肖生福;;新公共服務(wù)的行政責(zé)任觀及其啟示[J];江西社會(huì)科學(xué);2007年04期

7 周志忍;;公共組織績(jī)效評(píng)估：中國(guó)實(shí)踐的回顧與反思[J];蘭州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年01期

8 侯玉蘭;新公共服務(wù)理論與建設(shè)服務(wù)型政府[J];國(guó)家行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年04期

9 侯玉蘭;論建設(shè)服務(wù)型政府:內(nèi)涵及意義[J];理論前沿;2003年23期

10 張康之;;把握服務(wù)型政府研究的理論方向[J];人民論壇;2006年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：1803409