本文選題：盜竊罪 + 二元制　； 參考：《現(xiàn)代法學(xué)》2017年03期

【摘要】：我國對(duì)于盜竊行為采取行政違法和刑事違法的二元制治理模式,其中,盜竊數(shù)額是劃分盜竊治安案件和刑事案件(即盜竊罪)的重要標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。盜竊行為二元制治理模式雖然為時(shí)久遠(yuǎn),且富有效率,但也存在犯罪數(shù)量前后可比基準(zhǔn)不一致、刑事政策制定依據(jù)偏離客觀事實(shí)、警察權(quán)過大、司法權(quán)受限、難以對(duì)盜竊案件進(jìn)行統(tǒng)一、科學(xué)、有效治理等問題。為了解決二元制治理模式產(chǎn)生的弊端,基于法治語境和相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)理論,可以考慮將我國《治安管理處罰法》中的盜竊行為全部納入刑法,以盜竊罪予以處置,嘗試建立一元制的盜竊罪治理模式,此舉可以大大提升犯罪治理的法治化。
[Abstract]:Our country adopts the dual system governance mode of administrative and criminal illegal behavior, in which the amount of theft is an important standard to divide the theft case from the criminal case (that is, theft crime). Although the governance model of dual system of theft is long and efficient, there is also the inconsistency of comparable benchmark in the number of crimes, the basis of criminal policy making deviates from the objective facts, the police power is too large, and the judicial power is limited. Difficult to the theft case unified, scientific, effective governance and other issues. In order to solve the malpractice of dualistic governance mode, based on the context of the rule of law and the theory of comparative advantage, we can consider that the theft behavior in the Public Security Management punishment Law of our country should be brought into the criminal law to deal with the crime of larceny. Try to establish one-dollar system of larceny governance model, this can greatly improve the governance of crime.
【作者單位】： 北京師范大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：浙江工商大學(xué)法學(xué)基地科研項(xiàng)目“全面推進(jìn)依法治國與犯罪治理模式變革研究”(2015C001)
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 于志剛;;二元制刑事立法模式引發(fā)的司法尷尬[J];公民與法(法學(xué)版);2010年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：1780405