發(fā)布時間：2018-04-03 14:21

  本文選題：思想理論建設(shè)比較　切入點：國民黨　出處：《山東師范大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 國共兩黨經(jīng)過20余年的反復(fù)較量,最后翻了個,對立雙方的實力和地位發(fā)生了根本的變化,國民黨由大到小,由強到弱,最后喪失全國執(zhí)政地位。而中國共產(chǎn)黨由小到大,由弱到強,成為全國的執(zhí)政黨。時局變化之快,國共雙方誰也沒有料到。歷史如此的跌宕起伏,原因何在,令人深思。 筆者以民主革命時期國共兩黨思想理論建設(shè)比較研究作為題目,分別從兩黨思想理論建設(shè)的歷史考察為切入點,通過對比兩黨思想理論建設(shè)的相同點和不同點,論析了國民黨之所以失敗,共產(chǎn)黨之所以勝利的黨建上的歷史緣由,并簡要的闡發(fā)了這一結(jié)果的歷史啟示。 第一章為國共兩黨思想理論建設(shè)的理論淵源與事實依據(jù)。兩黨的思想理論建設(shè)的理論淵源有相同的一面,即都以俄為師,效法蘇俄共產(chǎn)黨的建黨模式,都以中國的傳統(tǒng)文化為傳承。也有不同的一面,即南京時期的國民黨推崇法西斯主義,其思想理論建設(shè)不免夾雜著法西斯的成分,而共產(chǎn)黨以先進的科學(xué)理論——馬克思主義為建黨立黨的基礎(chǔ)。這些思想理論建設(shè)淵源的同和不同,就給國共兩黨思想理論建設(shè)的效果和不同的歷史命運埋下了伏筆;國共兩黨都是在中國民族危機嚴(yán)重、軍閥割據(jù)混亂和救亡圖存的思想文化此起彼伏的歷史背景下產(chǎn)生和發(fā)展起來的;統(tǒng)一黨內(nèi)對三民主義的混亂解釋以加強自身的意識形態(tài)功能,對于中國共產(chǎn)黨意識形態(tài)宣傳的恐懼,成為國民黨思想理論建設(shè)的現(xiàn)實依據(jù)。認識到思想理論建設(shè)是黨的建設(shè)的根本,要解決好黨員成分構(gòu)成與黨的性質(zhì)的矛盾,克服左傾錯誤和完成新民主主義革命的艱難任務(wù)成為共產(chǎn)黨思想理論建設(shè)的現(xiàn)實依據(jù)。 第二章為國民黨思想理論建設(shè)的歷史回顧。南京國民政府建立以后,為了掌控黨員和國民的思想,構(gòu)建以三民主義為核心的主流意識形態(tài),國民黨人采取了各種措施,加強了對三民主義的學(xué)習(xí)、研究、宣傳和教育。為了攻擊科學(xué)社會主義、打壓其他反蔣派、維護自己的所謂正統(tǒng)地位,國民黨對三民主義進行了修正,把三民主義儒家化、倫理化和法西斯化。 第三章為共產(chǎn)黨思想理論建設(shè)的歷史回顧。把思想建設(shè)放在黨的建設(shè)的首位,著重從思想上建黨,是中國共產(chǎn)黨自身建設(shè)的一個顯著特點。為此,中國共產(chǎn)黨通過整風(fēng)、整黨和其他出色的思想理論建設(shè),強化了對馬克思主義的學(xué)習(xí)、研究、宣傳和教育工作。把馬克思主義和中國革命實際相結(jié)合,形成了中國的馬克思主義——毛澤東思想,實踐了馬克思主義與時俱進的理論品質(zhì)。 第四章為國共兩黨思想理論建設(shè)比較分析。本章評析了國共兩黨思想理論建設(shè)上的相同點:都對思想理論建設(shè)表現(xiàn)出了足夠的重視;都重視對三民主義的闡發(fā)以證明自己才是真正的三民主義者;都設(shè)有專門的組織機構(gòu)和制度;都運用思想灌輸?shù)闹匾侄?都重視在政治動員的過程中加強思想理論建設(shè)。接著評析了國共兩黨思想理論建設(shè)上的不同點:思想理論建設(shè)的性質(zhì)和重視程度不同;思想理論建設(shè)的內(nèi)容不同;思想理論建設(shè)的工作方式和方法不同;思想理論建設(shè)的實際效果存在天壤之別。 第五章為民主革命時期國共兩黨思想理論建設(shè)比較研究的歷史啟示。這是這篇文章的落腳點和寫作目的所在。為了避免重蹈歷史的覆轍,中國共產(chǎn)黨必須嚴(yán)守思想理論建設(shè)是黨的“生命線”這一共識,永葆黨的先進性,不斷加強黨的先進性建設(shè)和執(zhí)政能力建設(shè),必須與時俱進,進行理論創(chuàng)新。在維護國家主權(quán)和領(lǐng)土完整方面,在保障人權(quán)方面,在改善民生方面,共產(chǎn)黨才是三民主義的真正繼承者和實踐者。
[Abstract]:The KMT after 20 years of repeated bouts, finally turned, changed the opposing sides of the strength and status, the Kuomintang from big to small, from strong to weak, finally lost the ruling status. And the Communist Party of China from small to large, from weak to strong, become the country's ruling party. The political situation changed quickly, the two parties who did not expect so. History of ups and downs, why, thought-provoking.
Based on the ideological and theoretical construction of the Kuomintang and the Communist Party during the democratic revolution period comparative study as a topic, respectively from the perspective of Ideological and theoretical construction of history between the two parties as the starting point, through the same point of Ideological and theoretical construction of the two parties and the different points of comparison, analysis of the KMT failed history victory party of the Communist Party, and briefly explains the historical enlightenment this result.
The first chapter is the theoretical construction of the Kuomintang and the Communist Party Theory and factual basis. The theoretical origin of Ideological and theoretical building between the two parties have the same, that is to follow the example of Russia, the Soviet Russian Communist Party founding model to China traditional culture. There are also different side, namely Nanjing Kuomintang respected fascism the ideological and theoretical building inevitably mixed with elements of fascism, and CPC based on advanced scientific theory, the Marx doctrine as the basis for building the party. The ideological and theoretical construction with different origins and, for ideological and theoretical construction of the two parties and the effect of different historical fate foreshadowed; both the two parties are in the national China a serious crisis, the emergence and development of the warlord chaos and the salvation of the ideological and cultural background as one falls, another rises; the unity of the ThreePrinciples mix In order to strengthen the ideological function of their own interpretation of chaos, the Communist Party's ideology China fear become a reality basis for the construction of the Kuomintang ideology. The ideological and theoretical construction is the fundamental construction of the party, Party members to solve the composition and nature of the party contradiction, overcome the difficult task of leftist and new democratic revolution is the realistic basis of CPC's ideological and theoretical building.
The second chapter is the historical review of the construction of the ideological theory. After the establishment of the Nanjing national government, in order to control the thinking of Party members and citizens, the construction of mainstream ideology to the three principles of the people as the core, the Kuomintang had taken various measures to strengthen the three principles of learning, research, propaganda and education. In order to suppress other anti attack of scientific socialism. Chiang, maintain its orthodox position, KMT revised, the principles of Confucianism, ethics and fascism.
The third chapter is the review of the history of CPC's ideological and theoretical building. Put the thought construction of the party building in the first place, mainly from the ideological aspect, is one of the distinctive features of Chinese party self construction. Therefore, the Communist Party of Chinese through rectification, rectification and other ideological and theoretical construction, strengthen the theory of Marx learning, study, publicity and education work. The Marx doctrine and China revolutionary practice, formed a Chinese Marx doctrine -- Mao Zedong thought, practice the theoretical quality of Marx's times.
The fourth chapter is the comparative analysis of the ideological and theoretical construction, the Kuomintang and the Communist Party. This chapter of the same point between the two parties on the ideological and theoretical construction: on the ideological and theoretical construction showed enough attention; attach importance on the three principles of analysis to prove that he is the true followers of the three people's principles; with specific organizations and system; the use of an important means of ideological indoctrination; attach importance to strengthen the ideological and theoretical construction in the process of political mobilization. It analyzes the differences between the two parties on the ideological and theoretical construction: the nature of the ideological and theoretical construction and different degree of attention; the content of Ideological and theoretical building; to work in different ways and methods of the ideological and theoretical construction; the actual effect of ideological there is a world of difference. The theory of construction
The fifth chapter is the historical enlightenment of comparative study of Ideological and theoretical construction of the Kuomintang and the Communist Party during the democratic revolution period. This is the starting point and purpose of writing. In order to avoid repeating the mistakes of history, the Communist Party of Chinese must strictly observe the ideological and theoretical construction of the party is the "lifeline" of the consensus, maintain the advanced nature of the party, strengthen the construction of advanced nature the party's ruling ability construction, must keep pace with the times, carry out theoretical innovation. In the aspect of safeguarding national sovereignty and territorial integrity, in the protection of human rights, in terms of improving people's livelihood, the Communist Party is the true heir to the three people's principles and practice.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D261.1

【引證文獻】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 陳蒙;民主革命時期國共兩黨組織建設(shè)比較研究[D];山東師范大學(xué);2012年

2 李中華;毛澤東黨的思想建設(shè)理論及其現(xiàn)實意義[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué);2012年

3 牟建成;民主革命時期中國共產(chǎn)黨的信用建設(shè)研究[D];山東師范大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號：1705573