本文選題：基層治理法治化　切入點(diǎn)：民族地區(qū)　出處：《廣西師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：為順應(yīng)改革開放,深化改革,2014年10月在北京召開的黨的十八大四中全會(huì)上提出了“推進(jìn)基層治理法治化”的要求,即“全面推進(jìn)依法治國(guó),基礎(chǔ)在基層,工作重點(diǎn)在基層”。俗話說,基礎(chǔ)不牢,地動(dòng)山搖,重視基層治理法治化建設(shè),構(gòu)建完備的基層法治體系,才能確�；鶎由鐣�(huì)穩(wěn)定、人民安居樂業(yè)。文章第一部分主要介紹基層治理法治化與民族地區(qū)法治村屯概述。先介紹了什么是基層治理法治化,從而引出基層治理法治化的三特征是堅(jiān)持黨的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)、建設(shè)法治政府、弘揚(yáng)法治文化。然后介紹民族地區(qū)法治村屯的概念,從民族地區(qū)法治村屯的概念可以得知民族地區(qū)法治村屯具有法治化、民主化、制度化的特征。文章第二部分介紹了基層治理法治化視野下民族地區(qū)法治村屯建設(shè)的原則與內(nèi)容。建設(shè)民族地區(qū)法治村屯要堅(jiān)持維護(hù)國(guó)家統(tǒng)一、反對(duì)民族分裂的原則,落實(shí)民族區(qū)域自治的原則,促進(jìn)民族共同發(fā)展的原則,保障雜居、散居少數(shù)民族權(quán)利的原則。從推進(jìn)基層民主建設(shè)、社會(huì)管理綜合治理創(chuàng)新、發(fā)揮村規(guī)民約效力、提高法律意識(shí)等四個(gè)方面闡述民族地區(qū)法治村屯建設(shè)的內(nèi)容。文章第三部分指出當(dāng)前基層治理法治化視野下民族地區(qū)法治村屯建設(shè)取得的成就與存在的問題。從基層民主政治得到落實(shí),村民自治效果顯著;社會(huì)管理綜合治理能力得到提高,糾紛得到有效化解;村規(guī)民約有效的維持了村屯秩序,有效的補(bǔ)充了國(guó)家法的不足;法律意識(shí)得到進(jìn)一步提高論述基層治理法治化視野下民族地區(qū)法治村屯建設(shè)取得的成就。再?gòu)幕鶎用裰鬟�不夠健全,村委會(huì)與鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)政府、村黨支部還不夠協(xié)調(diào);社會(huì)管理綜合治理能力得到提高,糾紛解決方式有待完善;村規(guī)民約還不夠完善,村規(guī)民約與國(guó)家法還不夠相互融合;法律意識(shí)有待提高闡述民族地區(qū)法治建設(shè)所存在的問題。文章第四部分主要分析了基層治理法治化視野下民族地區(qū)法治村屯建設(shè)存在問題的原因分析。民族地區(qū)法治村屯建設(shè)存在問題的原因主要包括:自治功能還未充分落實(shí),村民自治制度還存在缺陷;社會(huì)治理能力低,矛盾沒有得到及時(shí)化解;村約制定主體意識(shí)不夠,國(guó)家法對(duì)村約存在空白;村民法治文化培育不足。文章最后一部分則指出了基層治理法治化視野下構(gòu)建民族地區(qū)法治村屯的新舉措。從完善村民自治法律法規(guī)、規(guī)范村委會(huì)與鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)政府以及村委會(huì)與村黨支部的關(guān)系,權(quán)責(zé)要更加明確論述落實(shí)村民自治,實(shí)現(xiàn)自我管理。從轉(zhuǎn)變政府職能,方便民眾訴訟、做到公正司法,完善訴訟外糾紛解決方式闡釋推進(jìn)社會(huì)綜合治理,完善糾紛解決方式。接著從規(guī)范村規(guī)民約,國(guó)家法與民間法的融合說明規(guī)范村規(guī)民約,促進(jìn)國(guó)家法與民間法的融合。最后從加大對(duì)教育的投入、提高法治宣傳質(zhì)量論述完善加強(qiáng)法治宣傳,提高村民法律意識(shí),從而構(gòu)建民族地區(qū)法治村屯。
[Abstract]:In order to comply with the reform and opening up and deepen the reform, the fourth Plenary session of the 18 CPC Central Committee held in Beijing on October 2014 put forward the requirement of "promoting the rule of law by law at the grass-roots level", that is, "comprehensively promoting the rule of law in accordance with the law, and the foundation lies at the grass-roots level." As the saying goes, "as the saying goes, only when the foundation is not strong, the ground is shaken, and the construction of grass-roots governance by law is attached importance to, and a complete grass-roots rule of law system can be built to ensure social stability at the grass-roots level. People live and work in peace and contentment. The first part of the article mainly introduces the rule of law at the grass-roots level and the village by law in minority areas. First, it introduces what is the rule of law by law at the grass-roots level, which leads to the three characteristics of the rule of law at the grass-roots level, which is to adhere to the leadership of the Party. Then introduce the concept of the village ruled by law in the minority areas. From the concept of the village ruled by law in the minority areas, we can know that the village ruled by law in the minority areas has the rule of law and democratization. The second part of the article introduces the principles and contents of the rule of law village construction in ethnic areas under the view of grass-roots governance and rule of law. In order to build the village under the rule of law in ethnic minority areas, we should uphold the principle of safeguarding national unity and opposing national division. To implement the principle of regional autonomy for ethnic groups, to promote the common development of ethnic groups, and to safeguard the rights of ethnic minorities living in mixed and scattered areas. The third part of the article points out the achievements and existing problems in the construction of the village ruled by law in ethnic minority areas under the view of the rule of law at the grass-roots level. Grassroots democracy has been implemented, The effect of villager autonomy is remarkable; the comprehensive management ability of the society is improved and the disputes are effectively resolved; the village rules and regulations effectively maintain the order of the village and effectively supplement the deficiencies of the national law; The legal consciousness has been further improved and discussed the achievements in the construction of the village ruled by law in ethnic minority areas under the view of the rule of law at the grass-roots level, and then the democracy at the grass-roots level is not perfect, the village committee is not in harmony with the township government, and the village party branch is not in harmony; The comprehensive management ability of social management has been improved, the dispute resolution method needs to be improved, the village rules and regulations are not perfect, the village rules and the state law are not enough to merge each other. Legal consciousness needs to be improved and the problems existing in the construction of the rule of law in ethnic minority areas are expounded. Part 4th mainly analyzes the causes of the problems existing in the construction of villages ruled by law in ethnic minority areas from the perspective of the rule of law at the grass-roots level. The main reasons for the problems in the construction of villages ruled by law include: the function of autonomy has not been fully implemented. The villager autonomy system still has the flaw; the social governance ability is low, the contradiction has not been resolved in time, the village covenant formulation main body consciousness is not enough, the state law has the blank to the village contract; The last part of the article points out the new measures to construct the village ruled by law in ethnic minority areas under the view of the rule of law at the grass-roots level, from the perspective of perfecting the laws and regulations of villager autonomy, In order to standardize the relationship between the village committee and the township government, and between the village committee and the village party branch, the power and responsibility should be more clearly expounded on the implementation of villager autonomy and the realization of self-management. Perfect the settlement of disputes outside litigation, explain and promote the comprehensive management of society, perfect the settlement of disputes. Then, from standardizing village rules and regulations, the fusion of state law and folk law explains how to regulate village rules and regulations. Finally, from increasing the investment in education, improving the quality of publicity on the rule of law, strengthening the publicity of the rule of law, enhancing the legal awareness of the villagers, so as to build a village ruled by law in ethnic areas.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D920.0

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 程又中;張勇;;城鄉(xiāng)基層治理:使之走出困境的政府責(zé)任[J];社會(huì)主義研究;2009年04期

2 鄭風(fēng)田;;新時(shí)期基層治理什么模式最合適[J];人民論壇;2010年01期

3 中共成都市委黨校課題組;李仁彬;;關(guān)于協(xié)商民主與基層治理的研究報(bào)告——以成都農(nóng)村新型基層治理機(jī)制為例[J];中共成都市委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2012年06期

4 貢太雷;張秀玉;;論社會(huì)基層治理的民主化與法治化[J];內(nèi)蒙古民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年03期

5 李金兆;徐霽;董亮;簡(jiǎn)青;;基層公開促進(jìn)基層治理的成都實(shí)踐[J];中共成都市委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2013年03期

6 舒紹福;;基層治理生態(tài)的失衡與調(diào)適——以“黑磚窯事件”為例[J];理論與改革;2007年06期

7 袁緒程;;加快基層治理的綜合配套改革[J];中國(guó)改革;2009年12期

8 ;謹(jǐn)防基礎(chǔ)“懸浮”[J];人民論壇;2010年01期

9 賀雪峰;劉岳;;基層治理中的“不出事邏輯”[J];學(xué)術(shù)研究;2010年06期

10 劉麗;唐紹洪;;論協(xié)商民主在基層治理中的價(jià)值[J];人民論壇;2010年17期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前3條

1 周斌;;城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌背景下的基層治理機(jī)制建設(shè)研究——基于對(duì)成都市新都區(qū)基層治理建設(shè)的個(gè)案分析[A];“中國(guó)特色社會(huì)主義行政管理體制”研討會(huì)暨中國(guó)行政管理學(xué)會(huì)第20屆年會(huì)論文集[C];2010年

2 陳輝;;新中國(guó)成立60年來城市基層治理的結(jié)構(gòu)與變遷[A];變遷中的中國(guó)城市治理[C];2013年

3 羅明;;“日常生活”人本化與民主化的漸進(jìn)——成都市構(gòu)建城鄉(xiāng)新型治理機(jī)制與提高村級(jí)公共服務(wù)的深遠(yuǎn)意義[A];全國(guó)社科院系統(tǒng)中國(guó)特色社會(huì)主義理論體系研究中心第十六屆年會(huì)暨理論研討會(huì)論文集——黨的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)與中國(guó)特色社會(huì)主義（上）[C];2009年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 馮興元;地方基層治理中的“委托——代理”[N];第一財(cái)經(jīng)日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

2 記者 趙秉瑜 吳麗霞;中國(guó)農(nóng)村婦女參與基層治理研討會(huì)在延召開[N];延安日?qǐng)?bào);2009年

3 周人杰;基層治理最愁“鈍刀子割肉”[N];人民日?qǐng)?bào);2014年

4 朱昌俊 四川 媒體人;“村霸”之死折射基層治理灰色化[N];長(zhǎng)江日?qǐng)?bào);2014年

5 佛山日?qǐng)?bào)通訊評(píng)論員 市社工委社會(huì)與社區(qū)建設(shè)指導(dǎo)科副科長(zhǎng) 李清平;重構(gòu)基層治理，凝聚社區(qū)認(rèn)同[N];佛山日?qǐng)?bào);2014年

6 首席記者 秦德勝;以治水推進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)轉(zhuǎn)型和基層治理[N];紹興日?qǐng)?bào);2014年

7 劉東豪 中共佛山市禪城區(qū)委書記;提高公共服務(wù)水平 構(gòu)建基層治理新格局[N];佛山日?qǐng)?bào);2014年

8 金秀;對(duì)上起訴一小步 基層治理一大步[N];中國(guó)縣域經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2014年

9 一溪;治理“群租”考驗(yàn)基層治理智慧[N];東方城鄉(xiāng)報(bào);2014年

10 何紹輝 湖南省社科院國(guó)家治理與公共政策研究中心副主任;基層治理要瞄準(zhǔn)需求靶心[N];人民日?qǐng)?bào);2014年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 楊艷文;社會(huì)組織與城市社會(huì)基層治理轉(zhuǎn)型研究[D];上海大學(xué);2015年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 冼銀崧;基層治理視角下的黃埔區(qū)“三化”服務(wù)管理創(chuàng)新研究[D];華南理工大學(xué);2015年

2 何泳龍;“兩說一聯(lián)”：以法治補(bǔ)充自治的地方實(shí)踐[D];華中師范大學(xué);2015年

3 朱洪榮;基層治理與縣鄉(xiāng)財(cái)政體制創(chuàng)新[D];云南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2015年

4 楊蓉榮;協(xié)商民主導(dǎo)向的城市基層治理研究[D];中共江蘇省委黨校;2015年

5 竇方;被擱置的改革：從周口平墳事件看網(wǎng)絡(luò)公共領(lǐng)域?qū)︵l(xiāng)村基層治理的影響機(jī)制[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2014年

6 毛光霞;秦漢轉(zhuǎn)型時(shí)期鄉(xiāng)紳治理的功能研究[D];東華大學(xué);2016年

7 曹玲玉;基層治理視域下的烏魯木齊市社區(qū)網(wǎng)格化管理研究[D];新疆大學(xué);2015年

8 吳滿;情理之間：公共事務(wù)中的動(dòng)員式治理[D];華東師范大學(xué);2016年

9 仲國(guó)威;街道辦事處的變遷：城市基層治理的演變、矛盾及對(duì)策[D];蘇州大學(xué);2016年

10 盧征;街道辦事處的權(quán)能配置研究[D];山東大學(xué);2016年

，

本文編號(hào)：1611997