本文選題：大學(xué)生　切入點：民主程度評價　出處：《青年研究》2017年05期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：當(dāng)今社會,各國普遍重視民眾對民主的評價。使用"中國青年價值調(diào)查"團隊的相關(guān)數(shù)據(jù),并進一步使用"民主評價的中外差異",比較大學(xué)生對不同國家民主程度的評價。探索性的回歸分析顯示,大學(xué)生對民主具有一般性的支持,但其對民主的本土化與情景化理解仍深刻影響著其對民主的評價。另外,中國國家治理評價的顯著影響表明,隨著國家治理能力的提升、治理體系的完善,中國治理式民主將更加得到大學(xué)生的認同,并使大學(xué)生在面對西方民主時更加具備制度自信。國家榮耀感雖然會顯著提升大學(xué)生對中國的民主評價,但并未顯著降低對美日的評價。這意味著所謂"狹隘的民族主義"至少在本研究看來是站不住腳的。這有力地駁斥了國際民主評價指標所暗含的話語霸權(quán)。
[Abstract]:In today's society, countries generally attach importance to people's evaluation of democracy. Use the relevant data from the "China Youth value Survey" team. Furthermore, using "the difference of democratic evaluation between China and foreign countries", the author compares college students' evaluation of democracy degree in different countries. The exploratory regression analysis shows that college students have general support for democracy. However, its understanding of the localization and contextualization of democracy still profoundly affects its evaluation of democracy. In addition, the significant influence of the evaluation of Chinese state governance shows that with the improvement of national governance capacity, the governance system is improved. China's governing democracy will be more recognized by college students and will give them more institutional confidence in the face of western democracy. Although the sense of national glory will significantly enhance college students' evaluation of democracy in China, This means that the so-called "narrow nationalism" is, at least, untenable in this study. This strongly refutes the discourse hegemony implied by international democratic evaluation indicators.
【作者單位】： 南京大學(xué)公共事務(wù)與地方治理研究中心;南京大學(xué)政府管理學(xué)院;
【基金】：國家社會科學(xué)基金重點項目“我國公民政治價值觀的實證研究”(16AZZ003)的階段性成果
【分類號】：D082;D432.6

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 彼得·羅森道夫,劉光軍;透明的提供與民主[J];馬克思主義與現(xiàn)實;2004年03期

，

本文編號：1586493