本文選題：行政會議　切入點：法制　出處：《西南政法大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】： 近年來,我國政府法制建設(shè)取得了長足的進步,隨著我國政府行政法制建設(shè)的發(fā)展,很多原來被學(xué)界忽視的政府活動領(lǐng)域,也逐步被納入學(xué)術(shù)研究的范疇。行政會議法制是我國政府法制的組成部分,本應(yīng)得到相應(yīng)的研究。事實上,早在二十世紀(jì)九十年代初,我國行政法學(xué)界,已經(jīng)有人提出了行政會議法制的命題,并進行了初步的分析。但此后的十幾年來,行政會議法制問題一直缺乏深入、系統(tǒng)的研究。行政會議法制的研究價值沒有得到應(yīng)有的重視,進而,行政會議法制實踐缺乏有效的理論支撐,缺乏實際效果。事實上,行政會議法制研究具有重要的現(xiàn)實意義和理論意義,應(yīng)當(dāng)?shù)玫较鄳?yīng)的研究。 在行政法學(xué)上研究行政會議與其他學(xué)科研究行政會議,在概念、目的、方法等方面,必須相互區(qū)別。在此前提下,從行政法學(xué)上研究行政會議法制包括如下內(nèi)容。 首先,行政會議的概念、特征及分類應(yīng)當(dāng)明確界定。政府會議概念本身具有依附性,不同性質(zhì)的政府會議內(nèi)容決定了會議本身具有不同的內(nèi)涵和目的。行政法學(xué)上應(yīng)當(dāng)研究的行政會議只是政府會議中的一部分,是旨在形成外部行政行為而舉行的政府會議。行政法上的行政會議的目的是,通過行政會議的行政性和法定性特征,保障行政主體做出行政行為過程的合法性和有效性。 其次,行政會議法制的基本范疇及其應(yīng)當(dāng)融入的行政法治精神應(yīng)當(dāng)闡述清晰。行政會議法制不僅僅指的是有關(guān)行政會議的規(guī)范性法律制度,行政會議法制當(dāng)中可以而且應(yīng)當(dāng)融入行政法治精神。研究行政會議法制的目的是重構(gòu)現(xiàn)有的行政會議規(guī)則,融入行政法治理念,使行政會議規(guī)則能夠得到有效實施,從而實現(xiàn)行政會議保障外部行政行為形成過程的正當(dāng)性、合法性的作用。行政會議法制當(dāng)中應(yīng)當(dāng)融入的行政法治精神包括,基礎(chǔ)性的行政法治和行政過程理念以及程序性的行政民主、正當(dāng)程序和行政公開理念。在具體重構(gòu)行政會議法制的規(guī)則內(nèi)容時,必須根據(jù)具體規(guī)則特殊性,平衡行政性的行政秩序、行政效能(效率、精簡、靈活)價值理念與法治性的行政法治價值理念的作用。 再次,行政會議法制的完善必須以行政會議法制的現(xiàn)有發(fā)展?fàn)顩r為基礎(chǔ)。國內(nèi)外有關(guān)行政會議法制的內(nèi)容往往不是直接與行政法學(xué)研究行政會議的視角相一致的。必須對具有廣泛性的國外會議議事規(guī)則、美國政府會議公開規(guī)則、我國政府會議規(guī)則現(xiàn)狀等內(nèi)容加以甄別,評述其中優(yōu)劣,并梳理其與行政會議法制的關(guān)系。 最后,行政會議法制完善內(nèi)容包括,形成行政會議的相關(guān)規(guī)則和分析行政會議規(guī)則的法律形式。行政會議的規(guī)則有,行政會議的外部規(guī)則、現(xiàn)場規(guī)則、責(zé)任監(jiān)督與追究規(guī)則等。在法律形式問題上,初步探討了行政會議法制應(yīng)當(dāng)具有的法律形式問題。
[Abstract]:In recent years, China's government legal system has made great progress. With the development of our government's administrative legal system, many areas of government activities that were previously ignored by academic circles have been neglected. The Executive Council legal system is an integral part of the legal system of our government and should have been studied accordingly. In fact, as early as 1990s, the administrative law circles in China, Some people have put forward the proposition of the legal system of the Executive Council and have made a preliminary analysis. However, over the past decade or so, the issue of the legal system of the Executive Council has been lacking in depth. Systematic research. The research value of the Executive Council legal system has not received due attention. Furthermore, the practice of the Executive Council legal system lacks effective theoretical support and practical effect. In fact, The study of the administrative council legal system is of great practical and theoretical significance and should be studied accordingly. It is necessary to distinguish the concept, purpose and method between the study of executive meeting and other disciplines in administrative law. On this premise, the study on the legal system of executive meeting from administrative law includes the following contents. First of all, the concept, characteristics and classification of the Executive Council should be clearly defined. The content of governmental meetings of different nature determines that the meetings themselves have different connotations and purposes. The Executive Council, which should be studied in the field of administrative law, is only a part of the governmental meetings. The purpose of the executive meeting in administrative law is to ensure the legitimacy and validity of the administrative action process by the administrative and legal characteristics of the administrative meeting. Secondly, the basic category of the legal system of the Executive Council and the spirit of the administrative rule of law that should be incorporated should be expounded clearly. The legal system of the Executive Council not only refers to the normative legal system of the Executive Council, The purpose of the study on the legal system of the Executive Council is to reconstruct the existing rules of the Executive Council, to incorporate the concept of the administrative rule of law, and to enable the rules of the Executive Council to be effectively implemented. So as to realize the legitimacy and legitimacy of the formation process of the external administrative act. The spirit of the administrative rule of law that should be incorporated in the legal system of the Executive Council includes, The basic ideas of administrative rule by law and administrative process, as well as procedural administrative democracy, due process and administrative openness. Balance the administrative order, the function of administrative efficiency (efficiency, simplification, flexibility) and the value of the rule of law. Again, The perfection of the legal system of the Executive Council must be based on the present development of the legal system of the Executive Council. The contents of the legal system of the Executive Council at home and abroad are often not directly consistent with the perspective of the study of the Executive Council by the administrative law. For the rules of procedure of foreign conferences of a broad nature, The open rules of the American government meeting and the present situation of the government meeting rules of our country are screened, the advantages and disadvantages are reviewed, and the relationship between them and the law system of the executive council is combed out. Finally, the contents of the perfection of the law system of the Executive Council include the formation of the relevant rules of the Executive Council and the analysis of the legal form of the rules of the Executive Council. The rules of the Executive Council include the external rules of the Executive Council, the rules on the spot, On the question of legal form, this paper preliminarily discusses the legal form that should have in the legal system of the Executive Council.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D922.1

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 莫于川;;從行政集權(quán)走向行政民主——我國行政法的民主化趨勢分析[J];重慶郵電學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2005年06期

2 新文;;南塘村農(nóng)民用羅伯特議事規(guī)則開會[J];山西農(nóng)業(yè)(村委主任);2009年05期

3 周實,趙凱;論美國對行政權(quán)的控制[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2003年03期

4 魯鵬宇;;日本行政法學(xué)理構(gòu)造的變革——以行政過程論為觀察視角[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2006年04期

5 王薇;香港特別行政區(qū)行政會議比較研究[J];當(dāng)代思潮;1997年03期

6 金崇保;關(guān)保英;;論行政會議的法制化[J];法制與經(jīng)濟;1996年06期

7 萬鵬飛;饒詩韻;;美國聯(lián)邦政府政務(wù)公開制度的實踐及啟示[J];經(jīng)濟社會體制比較;2006年02期

8 廖雄軍;;淺談會議的分類[J];秘書之友;1988年12期

9 李善階;;行政會議分類及內(nèi)容試析[J];秘書之友;1990年09期

10 蔣家平;提高行政會議效率的關(guān)鍵環(huán)節(jié)[J];秘書;1994年05期

，

本文編號：1576469