本文關(guān)鍵詞： 訓(xùn)政 道路 模式　出處：《云南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版)》2017年02期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：當(dāng)前中國特色社會主義法治與孫中山先生的"訓(xùn)政"相比,兩者相似之處在于都堅(jiān)持一黨執(zhí)政,并將此視為法治現(xiàn)代化進(jìn)程中不可或缺的一個(gè)階段性特征;不同之處在于兩者的內(nèi)容和性質(zhì)發(fā)生了根本變化。內(nèi)容的變化主要體現(xiàn)在社會基礎(chǔ)發(fā)生巨大變化和民主成分獲得較大增長;性質(zhì)的變化主要體現(xiàn)在它不再是資本主義而是中國特色社會主義性質(zhì)。以一黨長期執(zhí)政、不搞西方多黨競爭為特點(diǎn)的中國特色社會主義法治長期存在的原因是:中國屬于后發(fā)的政府主導(dǎo)的趕超型現(xiàn)代化國家,沒有形成橄欖形社會結(jié)構(gòu),需要通過建立能夠集中力量辦大事的政治體制,實(shí)現(xiàn)中國的"富"與"強(qiáng)"。
[Abstract]:Comparing the rule of law of socialism with Chinese characteristics with the "admonition" of Mr. Sun Zhongshan, the similarities between the two are that they both adhere to one-party governance and regard it as an indispensable stage feature in the process of modernization of the rule of law; The difference lies in the fact that the content and nature of the two have changed fundamentally. The change of the content is mainly reflected in the great changes in the social foundation and the great increase in the democratic elements. The change of nature is mainly reflected in the fact that it is not capitalism but socialism with Chinese characteristics. The reason why the socialist rule of law with Chinese characteristics, characterized by not engaging in multi-party competition in the West, has existed for a long time is that China belongs to the latecomer modern country dominated by the government, and has not formed an olive-shaped social structure. It is necessary to establish a political system capable of concentrating efforts on major issues to realize China's "rich" and "strong".
【作者單位】： 上海文史研究館;
【分類號】：D909.2
【正文快照】： 中國特色社會主義的道路是一種模式,還是一種道路(即階段性產(chǎn)物)?學(xué)術(shù)界近年來已分歧顯現(xiàn)。在我看來,陳端洪、強(qiáng)世功等先生開創(chuàng)的政治憲法研究,即是一種模式論趨向。美籍華裔學(xué)者熊s牶臀夜ㄍ逖д咧煸坪閡踩銜，

本文編號：1471663