本文關(guān)鍵詞： 法院調(diào)解 人民調(diào)解 和諧社會(huì) 訴調(diào)對(duì)接　出處：《長(zhǎng)春理工大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：改革開(kāi)放二十多年來(lái),我國(guó)民主法制取得了令人矚目的成就,2000年以來(lái)我國(guó)的經(jīng)濟(jì)平穩(wěn)且快速的發(fā)展,在國(guó)際上突顯大國(guó)實(shí)力,人民的生活得到了質(zhì)的改變,社會(huì)正向著一個(gè)和諧穩(wěn)定的有利局面發(fā)展,我黨也正在此時(shí)提出了構(gòu)建社會(huì)主義和諧社會(huì)的偉大目標(biāo),這就需要法律工作者要以最柔和的方式把矛盾化解在初級(jí)階段,保障社會(huì)的穩(wěn)定和諧,調(diào)解正是在這一歷史時(shí)期又一次被擺在了歷史的重要舞臺(tái)之上。法院調(diào)解也就是司法調(diào)解,是法院除審判之外又一種重要的化解糾紛的方式,在多年的法院工作實(shí)踐中是最實(shí)用、最根本、最節(jié)約司法資源的結(jié)案方式,而人民調(diào)解,是最普遍、最人性化的化解糾紛的方式。這兩種調(diào)解方式是調(diào)解工作的主要手段,是大調(diào)解體系中兩個(gè)最為主要的環(huán)節(jié),把二者有效的銜接在一起即有利于司法成本的節(jié)約又有利于和諧社會(huì)的構(gòu)建,也有利于對(duì)人民調(diào)解協(xié)議的法律約束�？梢�(jiàn),要確保社會(huì)主義和諧社會(huì)的構(gòu)建,法院調(diào)解和人民調(diào)解的對(duì)接是個(gè)重要環(huán)節(jié)。因此,我的這篇論文主要研究法院調(diào)解與人民調(diào)解在社會(huì)主義和諧社會(huì)構(gòu)建的新時(shí)期如何對(duì)接的問(wèn)題。 本篇論文我主要通過(guò)四部分來(lái)論述,第一部分我交代了法院調(diào)解和人民調(diào)解的定義,讓讀者對(duì)法院調(diào)解和人民調(diào)解都有一個(gè)初步的印象；第二部分我主要寫了法院調(diào)解存在的優(yōu)點(diǎn),也寫了法院調(diào)解中存在的一些問(wèn)題,讓讀者對(duì)法院調(diào)解有了更深刻的了解,也為法院調(diào)解和人民調(diào)解的對(duì)接做了鋪墊；第三部分,我主要論述為什么要進(jìn)行二者的對(duì)接工作,也借鑒了西方一些國(guó)家的先進(jìn)經(jīng)驗(yàn)。第四部分,我通過(guò)對(duì)Y市人民法院調(diào)解調(diào)解工作的借鑒總結(jié)經(jīng)驗(yàn),提出二者對(duì)接的程序構(gòu)想,解決二者對(duì)接后的一些問(wèn)題。
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up for more than 20 years, China's democracy and legal system has made remarkable achievements. Since 2000, China's economy has developed steadily and rapidly, highlighting the strength of great powers in the world. People's life has been qualitatively changed, the society is moving towards a harmonious and stable favorable situation, our party is also at this time put forward the great goal of building a socialist harmonious society. This requires legal workers to defuse contradictions in the primary stage in the softest way to ensure social stability and harmony. It is in this historical period that mediation is once again placed on the important stage of history. Court mediation is also called judicial mediation, which is also an important way for the court to resolve disputes in addition to trial. In many years of court work practice is the most practical, the most fundamental, the most economical judicial resources to close the case, and the people's mediation, is the most common. The most humane way to resolve disputes. These two mediation methods are the main means of mediation, is the two most important links in the great mediation system. Linking the two together effectively is beneficial to the construction of a harmonious society and to the construction of a harmonious society. Therefore, it is necessary to ensure the construction of a harmonious socialist society. The connection between court mediation and people mediation is an important link. Therefore, my thesis mainly studies how to connect court mediation and people mediation in the new period of socialist harmonious society. In the first part, I explain the definition of court mediation and people's mediation, which makes readers have a preliminary impression of court mediation and people's mediation. In the second part, I mainly write about the advantages of court mediation, but also write about some problems in court mediation, so that readers have a deeper understanding of court mediation. It also paves the way for the docking of court mediation and people's mediation. The third part, I mainly discuss why the two docking work, but also learn from the advanced experience of some western countries. 4th part, I through the Y City people's Court mediation work to draw lessons from summing up experience. This paper puts forward the program conception of the two docking and solves some problems after the two docking.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：長(zhǎng)春理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 何兵;論民間調(diào)解組織之重構(gòu)[J];中國(guó)司法;2004年02期

2 占善剛;;人民調(diào)解協(xié)議司法確認(rèn)之定性分析[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2012年03期

3 路麗芳;于永勝;;論行政調(diào)解的實(shí)體性基本原則基礎(chǔ)[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年22期

4 高軍,龍一平,徐宏偉;略論中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)無(wú)訟法律文化對(duì)建設(shè)當(dāng)代和諧社會(huì)的啟示[J];湖北民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年04期

5 劉懷玉,王中江,徐必珍;當(dāng)代中國(guó)社會(huì)穩(wěn)定問(wèn)題之結(jié)構(gòu)分析[J];江漢論壇;1994年12期

6 忠民;;法從民意[J];吉林人大;2004年11期

7 許小蓮;;論行政爭(zhēng)議處理和諧之路:行政調(diào)解[J];江西行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年01期

8 李浩;民事審判中的調(diào)審分離[J];法學(xué)研究;1996年04期

9 陳斯;段體操;;轉(zhuǎn)型期司法調(diào)解的推進(jìn)路徑——以東莞法院為視角[J];司法;2010年00期

10 劉艷梅;孫廣義;王志穎;;關(guān)于建立和完善行政調(diào)解制度的對(duì)策思考[J];學(xué)術(shù)交流;2009年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：1444852