生態(tài)馬克思主義理論走向及其實(shí)踐
[Abstract]:In recent years, the global environment has deteriorated abnormally and various natural disasters have occurred frequently. In the face of severe ecological environmental crisis, the construction of ecological civilization has increasingly become the focus of attention of writers, social activists and politicians. Strengthening the consciousness of ecological civilization and finding solutions to ecological crisis are the most urgent issues faced by human society at present. Theory is the forerunner of behavior. Ecological Marxism emerges at the historic moment under this background, and provides beneficial reference and enlightenment for human society to reflect and solve the ecological crisis. The purpose of this paper is to analyze and discuss the value, significance and limitation of ecological Marxism, and to select and sort out Ben Agger's theory of alienation consumption, William Rice, The interpretation of ecology from Goz's view of political ecology and the theoretical views of some of the most representative eco-Marxist scholars, such as O'Connor, show the advantages and disadvantages of different theoretical schools of ecological Marxism from different theoretical perspectives. On the basis of comparing ecological Marxism with Marxist ecological view, it is further expounded that Marxist ecological view is the theoretical foundation of ecological Marxism. Ecological Marxism inherits and develops the ecological view of Marxism to a certain extent. With the continuous development and maturity of ecological Marxism theory, in the light of the principle of "getting rid of its dross and taking its essence", the scientific and reasonable theoretical factors of ecological Marxism are combined with the concrete practice of ecological civilization construction in China at present. It provides positive and beneficial theoretical support for the construction of resource-saving and environment-friendly society.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:合肥工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:B089.1;A81
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條
1 李承宗;;馬克思與羅爾斯頓生態(tài)價(jià)值觀之比較[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年03期
2 吳寧;;高茲的生態(tài)政治學(xué)[J];國(guó)外社會(huì)科學(xué);2007年02期
3 韓秀霜;;國(guó)內(nèi)生態(tài)馬克思主義研究綜述[J];長(zhǎng)江論壇;2012年04期
4 劉仁勝;法蘭克福學(xué)派的生態(tài)學(xué)思想[J];江西社會(huì)科學(xué);2004年10期
5 包慶德;夏雪;;國(guó)內(nèi)學(xué)界關(guān)于生態(tài)學(xué)馬克思主義生態(tài)危機(jī)根源研究述評(píng)[J];南京林業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年02期
6 包慶德;;評(píng)阿格爾生態(tài)學(xué)馬克思主義異化消費(fèi)理論[J];馬克思主義研究;2012年04期
7 黃海東;;談建設(shè)生態(tài)文明的內(nèi)涵與意義[J];商業(yè)時(shí)代;2009年01期
8 陳食霖;;當(dāng)代西方生態(tài)學(xué)馬克思主義生態(tài)危機(jī)理論評(píng)析[J];武漢大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文科學(xué)版);2008年06期
9 吳寧;;批判經(jīng)濟(jì)理性、重建生態(tài)理性——高茲的現(xiàn)代性方案述評(píng)[J];哲學(xué)動(dòng)態(tài);2007年07期
本文編號(hào):2464422
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/makesizhuyiyanjiu/2464422.html