【摘要】：馬克思在《經(jīng)濟學(xué)手稿(1857—1858年)》中闡述了歷史性方法的雙重批判意蘊:一方面,歷史性方法是對抽象理論的批判,即將抽象理論放置在具體的社會歷史發(fā)展階段中加以考察;另一方面,歷史性方法是對資本主義社會的批判。只有通過對資本主義社會現(xiàn)實進行歷史性批判,抽象理論的社會歷史根源才能得以揭示。這一維度的批判構(gòu)成了馬克思歷史性方法與其他社會科學(xué)方法之間的原則性區(qū)別。在馬克思歷史性方法的觀照下,歷史唯物主義經(jīng)典理論將會得到重新理解,社會歷史發(fā)展規(guī)律不再被理解為先驗的、超歷史的規(guī)律,歷史唯物主義也不再被理解為一種僵化的理論教條,從而具有批判性和開放性的理論品格。
[Abstract]:Marx expounded the double critical implication of the historical method in the manuscript of Economics (1857-1858): on the one hand, the historical method is the critique of abstract theory. The abstract theory should be placed in the concrete stage of social and historical development. On the other hand, the historical method is to criticize the capitalist society. Only through historical criticism of capitalist social reality can the social and historical roots of abstract theory be revealed. The criticism of this dimension constitutes the principle difference between Marx's historical method and other social science methods. In the light of Marx's historical method, the classical theory of historical materialism will be reinterpreted, and the law of social and historical development will no longer be understood as a transcendental, transcendental law. Historical materialism is no longer understood as a rigid theoretical dogma, thus having a critical and open theoretical character.
【作者單位】： 北京大學(xué)馬克思主義學(xué)院;
【分類號】：A81
，

本文編號：2377574