【摘要】：黨內(nèi)批評(píng)是我們黨一貫倡導(dǎo)并堅(jiān)持的優(yōu)良作風(fēng),也是我們黨區(qū)別于其他任何政黨的顯著標(biāo)志之一。列寧的黨內(nèi)批評(píng)思想是一筆寶貴的理論遺產(chǎn)。他在繼承馬克思、恩格斯黨內(nèi)批評(píng)思想的基礎(chǔ)上,站在時(shí)代發(fā)展的高度,結(jié)合俄國(guó)無(wú)產(chǎn)階級(jí)革命和社會(huì)主義建設(shè)的具體實(shí)際,對(duì)俄國(guó)社會(huì)民主工黨的建設(shè)問(wèn)題特別是黨內(nèi)批評(píng)問(wèn)題,進(jìn)行了長(zhǎng)時(shí)間的深入探討和縝密思考,不僅極大地豐富和發(fā)展了馬克思恩格斯的黨內(nèi)批評(píng)思想,而且創(chuàng)造了布爾什維克黨內(nèi)批評(píng)的偉大實(shí)踐,開創(chuàng)了一個(gè)偉大的黨內(nèi)民主時(shí)代,具有重要的研究?jī)r(jià)值和現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。 俄國(guó)無(wú)產(chǎn)階級(jí)是在專制的沙皇政權(quán)統(tǒng)治下覺(jué)醒并壯大的,對(duì)民主權(quán)利的呼喚因此尤為強(qiáng)烈。而馬克思、恩格斯從建立無(wú)產(chǎn)階級(jí)政黨的那天開始,就主張黨內(nèi)批評(píng)是無(wú)產(chǎn)階級(jí)區(qū)別于其他政黨的重要標(biāo)志之一。因此,列寧繼承和發(fā)展了馬克思恩格斯的黨內(nèi)批評(píng)主張,結(jié)合俄國(guó)革命實(shí)際,提出真正自由的黨內(nèi)批評(píng)是無(wú)產(chǎn)階級(jí)政黨的重要標(biāo)志,更在實(shí)踐中提出了黨內(nèi)批評(píng)的一系列重要原則,自己也成為黨內(nèi)批評(píng)的模范實(shí)踐者,主張用一定的制度來(lái)保障黨內(nèi)批評(píng)。即使在彌留之際,列寧也從未放棄過(guò)對(duì)黨內(nèi)批評(píng)的思考。理論聯(lián)系實(shí)際,綜觀中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨的發(fā)展歷程,與蘇維埃布爾什維克黨的成長(zhǎng)有著一定的相似之處。列寧的黨內(nèi)批評(píng)思想對(duì)我國(guó)黨的建設(shè)也有一定的借鑒意義。 列寧的黨內(nèi)批評(píng)思想是列寧主義的重要組成部分。列寧在黨內(nèi)批評(píng)問(wèn)題上,旗幟鮮明的繼承和發(fā)展了馬克思主義的基本觀點(diǎn),開創(chuàng)了蘇維埃無(wú)產(chǎn)階級(jí)政黨建設(shè)的理論與實(shí)踐。具有重要的歷史地位；從社會(huì)主義的歷史實(shí)踐來(lái)看,列寧在無(wú)產(chǎn)階級(jí)政黨建設(shè)上,創(chuàng)造的黨內(nèi)批評(píng)實(shí)踐,以及后來(lái)斯大林對(duì)列寧黨內(nèi)批評(píng)思想的嚴(yán)重背棄所造成的災(zāi)難性后果,具有極其寶貴的借鑒和參考價(jià)值；從全力提升中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨黨內(nèi)民主水平的角度來(lái)看,列寧的黨內(nèi)批評(píng)主張具有重要的現(xiàn)實(shí)指導(dǎo)意義和方法論價(jià)值。
[Abstract]:Inner-Party criticism is a good style of work that our Party has always advocated and adhered to, and it is also one of the remarkable symbols of our Party's distinction from any other political party. Lenin's inner-party criticism is a valuable theoretical legacy. On the basis of inheriting Marx and Engels' inner-party critical thought, he stood at the height of the development of the times and combined with the concrete reality of the Russian proletarian revolution and socialist construction. The construction of the Russian Social Democratic Labor Party, especially the issue of inner-party criticism, has been deeply discussed and carefully pondered for a long time. It not only enriches and develops Marx and Engels' inner-party criticism thoughts, Moreover, it created the great practice of Bolshevik inner-party criticism and opened a great era of inner-party democracy, which has important research value and practical significance. The Russian proletariat awoke and grew under the autocratic czarist regime, so the call for democratic rights was particularly strong. Marx and Engels, from the day of the establishment of the proletarian party, argued that criticism within the party was one of the important symbols of the proletariat's distinction from other political parties. Therefore, Lenin inherited and developed Marx and Engels' inner-party criticism, and put forward that a truly free inner-party criticism was an important symbol of the proletarian party in the light of the reality of the Russian revolution. In practice, he put forward a series of important principles of inner-party criticism, and he also became a model practitioner of inner-party criticism, and advocated to use a certain system to protect the inner-party criticism. Even as he died, Lenin never gave up thinking about party criticism. The development of the Communist Party of China is similar to the growth of the Soviet Bolshevik Party. Lenin's inner-party criticism thought also has certain reference significance to our country's party construction. Lenin's inner-party criticism is an important part of Leninism. Lenin inherited and developed the basic viewpoint of Marxism on the issue of inner-party criticism, and initiated the theory and practice of the party construction of Soviet proletariat. Has an important historical position; Judging from the historical practice of socialism, Lenin created the practice of inner-party criticism in the construction of the proletarian party, and the disastrous consequences of Stalin's serious renegade of Lenin's inner-party criticism thought. Have extremely precious reference and reference value; From the angle of promoting the democratic level of CPC, Lenin's inner-party criticism has important practical guiding significance and methodological value.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：A821;D261.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 司永海;;列寧黨內(nèi)民主思想探源[J];湖北社會(huì)科學(xué);2010年11期

2 尹彥;讀高放先生的《列寧關(guān)于社會(huì)主義民主制的理論與實(shí)踐》、《從蘇共興亡看政黨現(xiàn)代化》有感[J];中共杭州市委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2005年04期

3 高放;蘇聯(lián)共產(chǎn)黨的黨內(nèi)民主怎樣被破壞殆盡[J];江蘇行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年03期

4 高放;國(guó)際共運(yùn)歷史上共產(chǎn)黨自身建設(shè)的歷史經(jīng)驗(yàn)[J];科學(xué)社會(huì)主義;2004年02期

5 鄭易平;聶圣平;;論鄧小平對(duì)列寧黨內(nèi)民主思想的繼承與發(fā)展[J];毛澤東鄧小平理論研究;2009年08期

6 張傳平;;西方“列寧學(xué)”視域中的列寧主義及其批判[J];南京社會(huì)科學(xué);2008年12期

7 高放;列寧關(guān)于社會(huì)主義民主制的理論與實(shí)踐[J];南京社會(huì)科學(xué);1995年01期

8 王進(jìn)芬;;列寧關(guān)于民主執(zhí)政的探索與嘗試[J];求實(shí);2006年06期

9 宋義明,姚德力;近五年來(lái)關(guān)于黨內(nèi)民主問(wèn)題的研究綜述[J];探索;2004年03期

10 周必文;;學(xué)習(xí)列寧關(guān)于黨內(nèi)民主的觀點(diǎn)[J];科社研究;1984年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 李志芳;列寧黨內(nèi)民主監(jiān)督思想研究[D];遼寧大學(xué);2012年

2 龔艷蘋;列寧黨內(nèi)民主思想及其當(dāng)代價(jià)值研究[D];西北師范大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：2343652