馬克思的社會所有制理論研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-11-08 13:09
【摘要】：馬克思的社會所有制，指的是勞動者在全社會范圍內(nèi)對生產(chǎn)資料的共同占有，人與人之間對生產(chǎn)資料的關(guān)系不存在任何區(qū)別，勞動者與所有者合二為一。在馬克思恩格斯的著作中，關(guān)于“社會所有制”許多不同的表述或提法在實質(zhì)上是一樣的，指的都是社會所有。實現(xiàn)社會所有制的前提條件是社會生產(chǎn)力的高度發(fā)達；實踐中經(jīng)濟文化落后的社會主義國家，由于生產(chǎn)力發(fā)展并不充分，還遠遠不具備實現(xiàn)社會所有制的條件。在未來社會，實行社會所有制的必然結(jié)果是無商品和貨幣、無階級和國家�，F(xiàn)實實踐中的社會主義實際上是仍然處于馬克思講的“過渡時期”的社會主義，并非馬克思的共產(chǎn)主義第一階段；在社會主義發(fā)展的現(xiàn)階段，存在和發(fā)展商品經(jīng)濟、存在階級和國家并不違背馬克思的邏輯。馬克思所講的社會所有制，，不存在“全民”與“集體”兩種形式的區(qū)別，更不存在“公有制的多種實現(xiàn)形式”；而股份制只是向社會所有制的一個過渡點，私有制更與社會所有制風牛馬不相及。深入學習和研究馬克思的社會所有制理論，對區(qū)別“過渡時期的公有制”與“社會主義社會的公有制”、深入認識我們目前所處的發(fā)展階段、澄清各種理論混亂、更好地建設(shè)中國特色社會主義具有重要的理論價值和現(xiàn)實意義。
[Abstract]:Marx's social ownership refers to the joint possession of the means of production by the laborer in the whole society. There is no difference in the relationship between the people and the means of production, and the laborer and the owner are one. In Marx and Engels' works, many different expressions or formulations of "social ownership" are essentially the same, referring to social ownership. The prerequisite for the realization of social ownership is the highly developed social productive forces, and the socialist countries with backward economy and culture in practice are far from having the conditions to realize social ownership because the development of productive forces is not sufficient. In the future, the inevitable result of social ownership is no goods and money, no class and no state. In reality, socialism in practice is still in the "transitional period" as Marx called it, not the first stage of Marx's communism. At the present stage of socialist development, the existence and development of commodity economy does not violate Marx's logic. There is no difference between "the whole people" and "collectivity" in the social ownership mentioned by Marx, let alone the "various forms of realizing public ownership". The stock system is only a transition to social ownership, private ownership and social ownership is different. To deeply study and study Marx's theory of social ownership, to distinguish between "public ownership in the transitional period" and "public ownership in the socialist society," to deeply understand the stage of development we are currently in, and to clarify the confusion in various theories. Better construction of socialism with Chinese characteristics has important theoretical value and practical significance.
【學位授予單位】：蘇州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：A811
本文編號：2318596
[Abstract]:Marx's social ownership refers to the joint possession of the means of production by the laborer in the whole society. There is no difference in the relationship between the people and the means of production, and the laborer and the owner are one. In Marx and Engels' works, many different expressions or formulations of "social ownership" are essentially the same, referring to social ownership. The prerequisite for the realization of social ownership is the highly developed social productive forces, and the socialist countries with backward economy and culture in practice are far from having the conditions to realize social ownership because the development of productive forces is not sufficient. In the future, the inevitable result of social ownership is no goods and money, no class and no state. In reality, socialism in practice is still in the "transitional period" as Marx called it, not the first stage of Marx's communism. At the present stage of socialist development, the existence and development of commodity economy does not violate Marx's logic. There is no difference between "the whole people" and "collectivity" in the social ownership mentioned by Marx, let alone the "various forms of realizing public ownership". The stock system is only a transition to social ownership, private ownership and social ownership is different. To deeply study and study Marx's theory of social ownership, to distinguish between "public ownership in the transitional period" and "public ownership in the socialist society," to deeply understand the stage of development we are currently in, and to clarify the confusion in various theories. Better construction of socialism with Chinese characteristics has important theoretical value and practical significance.
【學位授予單位】：蘇州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：A811
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條
1 石鎮(zhèn)平;;馬克思主義經(jīng)典作家過渡時期長期性思想研究[J];理論學刊;2007年04期
2 智效和;;論重建個人所有制與股份制問題[J];理論學刊;2007年09期
3 謝韜;辛子陵;;試解馬克思重建個人所有制的理論與中國改革[J];炎黃春秋;2007年06期
本文編號：2318596
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/makesizhuyiyanjiu/2318596.html
