【摘要】：馬克思的社會(huì)所有制，指的是勞動(dòng)者在全社會(huì)范圍內(nèi)對(duì)生產(chǎn)資料的共同占有，人與人之間對(duì)生產(chǎn)資料的關(guān)系不存在任何區(qū)別，勞動(dòng)者與所有者合二為一。在馬克思恩格斯的著作中，關(guān)于“社會(huì)所有制”許多不同的表述或提法在實(shí)質(zhì)上是一樣的，指的都是社會(huì)所有。實(shí)現(xiàn)社會(huì)所有制的前提條件是社會(huì)生產(chǎn)力的高度發(fā)達(dá)；實(shí)踐中經(jīng)濟(jì)文化落后的社會(huì)主義國(guó)家，由于生產(chǎn)力發(fā)展并不充分，還遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)不具備實(shí)現(xiàn)社會(huì)所有制的條件。在未來(lái)社會(huì)，實(shí)行社會(huì)所有制的必然結(jié)果是無(wú)商品和貨幣、無(wú)階級(jí)和國(guó)家�，F(xiàn)實(shí)實(shí)踐中的社會(huì)主義實(shí)際上是仍然處于馬克思講的“過(guò)渡時(shí)期”的社會(huì)主義，并非馬克思的共產(chǎn)主義第一階段；在社會(huì)主義發(fā)展的現(xiàn)階段，存在和發(fā)展商品經(jīng)濟(jì)、存在階級(jí)和國(guó)家并不違背馬克思的邏輯。馬克思所講的社會(huì)所有制，，不存在“全民”與“集體”兩種形式的區(qū)別，更不存在“公有制的多種實(shí)現(xiàn)形式”；而股份制只是向社會(huì)所有制的一個(gè)過(guò)渡點(diǎn)，私有制更與社會(huì)所有制風(fēng)牛馬不相及。深入學(xué)習(xí)和研究馬克思的社會(huì)所有制理論，對(duì)區(qū)別“過(guò)渡時(shí)期的公有制”與“社會(huì)主義社會(huì)的公有制”、深入認(rèn)識(shí)我們目前所處的發(fā)展階段、澄清各種理論混亂、更好地建設(shè)中國(guó)特色社會(huì)主義具有重要的理論價(jià)值和現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。
[Abstract]:Marx's social ownership refers to the joint possession of the means of production by the laborer in the whole society. There is no difference in the relationship between the people and the means of production, and the laborer and the owner are one. In Marx and Engels' works, many different expressions or formulations of "social ownership" are essentially the same, referring to social ownership. The prerequisite for the realization of social ownership is the highly developed social productive forces, and the socialist countries with backward economy and culture in practice are far from having the conditions to realize social ownership because the development of productive forces is not sufficient. In the future, the inevitable result of social ownership is no goods and money, no class and no state. In reality, socialism in practice is still in the "transitional period" as Marx called it, not the first stage of Marx's communism. At the present stage of socialist development, the existence and development of commodity economy does not violate Marx's logic. There is no difference between "the whole people" and "collectivity" in the social ownership mentioned by Marx, let alone the "various forms of realizing public ownership". The stock system is only a transition to social ownership, private ownership and social ownership is different. To deeply study and study Marx's theory of social ownership, to distinguish between "public ownership in the transitional period" and "public ownership in the socialist society," to deeply understand the stage of development we are currently in, and to clarify the confusion in various theories. Better construction of socialism with Chinese characteristics has important theoretical value and practical significance.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘇州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：A811

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 石鎮(zhèn)平;;馬克思主義經(jīng)典作家過(guò)渡時(shí)期長(zhǎng)期性思想研究[J];理論學(xué)刊;2007年04期

2 智效和;;論重建個(gè)人所有制與股份制問(wèn)題[J];理論學(xué)刊;2007年09期

3 謝韜;辛子陵;;試解馬克思重建個(gè)人所有制的理論與中國(guó)改革[J];炎黃春秋;2007年06期

本文編號(hào)：2318596