本文選題：馬克思 + 私有財(cái)產(chǎn)批判思想　； 參考：《西南大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：馬克思的私有財(cái)產(chǎn)批判思想作為馬克思主義哲學(xué)對(duì)現(xiàn)實(shí)世界批判的主要內(nèi)容,是馬克思批判資本主義制度和資本主義生產(chǎn)方式的前提和基礎(chǔ)。馬克思通過對(duì)資本主義條件下的商品、貨幣、分工和勞動(dòng)等形式的批判進(jìn)而達(dá)到消滅異化勞動(dòng)條件下的私有財(cái)產(chǎn)。在當(dāng)前的社會(huì)條件下,資本通過不同的方式和手段涌入中國,私有財(cái)產(chǎn)在社會(huì)財(cái)富中所占的比例日益增加,社會(huì)財(cái)富愈來愈集中在少數(shù)人手中,最終導(dǎo)致整個(gè)社會(huì)的貧富差距越來越大。因此,研究馬克思的私有財(cái)產(chǎn)批判思想,對(duì)合理地解決我國社會(huì)財(cái)富的分配問題具有重大的意義。基于上述的思考,本文通過以下四個(gè)部分來展開論述： 導(dǎo)言,問題的提出和研究本論題的意義。剖析當(dāng)前我國經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展中所存在的收入分配不合理的問題,并引出文章的主旨,同時(shí)闡明研究馬克思私有財(cái)產(chǎn)批判思想的理論意義和實(shí)踐意義。 第一章,考察馬克思私有財(cái)產(chǎn)批判思想的理論來源和發(fā)展歷程。馬克思的私有財(cái)產(chǎn)批判思想主要來源于近代資產(chǎn)階級(jí)國民經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家和空想社會(huì)主義者的私有財(cái)產(chǎn)批判思想。筆者通過分析他們的私有財(cái)產(chǎn)批判思想的不足和缺陷,從而指出和論證了馬克思私有財(cái)產(chǎn)批判思想產(chǎn)生的科學(xué)性。 第二章,著重論述馬克思私有財(cái)產(chǎn)批判思想的邏輯根據(jù)、基本內(nèi)容和必然結(jié)論。馬克思私有財(cái)產(chǎn)批判思想的邏輯根據(jù)是通過其創(chuàng)立的歷史唯物主義、勞動(dòng)價(jià)值理論而逐步形成的；馬克思首先通過對(duì)私有財(cái)產(chǎn)的批判,逐步過渡到對(duì)當(dāng)前資本主義生產(chǎn)方式和資本主義制度的批判；就馬克思的私有財(cái)產(chǎn)批判思想的發(fā)展歷程來看,它貫穿于馬克思本人從早年到晚年長(zhǎng)達(dá)四十年的理論研究中,其所涉獵的內(nèi)容十分豐富；馬克思對(duì)私有財(cái)產(chǎn)批判的必然結(jié)論是“公有制代替私有制”。 第三章,重點(diǎn)探討馬克思私有財(cái)產(chǎn)批判思想的當(dāng)代意義。第一,針對(duì)我國特色社會(huì)主義建設(shè)中的私有財(cái)產(chǎn)“入憲”與中國不搞“私有化”的邏輯矛盾,追尋當(dāng)代中國私有財(cái)產(chǎn)的未來歸宿。第二,通過對(duì)馬克思關(guān)于私有財(cái)產(chǎn)思想的文本解讀,并結(jié)合我國當(dāng)前私有財(cái)產(chǎn)所面臨的實(shí)際問題,還原馬克思私有財(cái)產(chǎn)批判思想的真正本質(zhì),按照馬克思的理論訴求去闡釋私有財(cái)產(chǎn)及其相關(guān)問題。第三,喚起人們對(duì)當(dāng)代中國現(xiàn)實(shí)的熱切關(guān)注,尤其是在特定歷史時(shí)期能夠以馬克思的實(shí)踐思維方式和社會(huì)歷史理論來正確地指導(dǎo)我們目前所要亟待解決的重大現(xiàn)實(shí)問題。
[Abstract]:As the main content of Marxist philosophy criticizing the real world, Marx's critique of private property is the premise and foundation of Marx's critique of capitalist system and capitalist mode of production. By criticizing commodities, money, division of labor and labor under capitalist conditions, Marx achieved the elimination of private property under the condition of alienated labor. Under the current social conditions, capital flows into China through different ways and means. Private property accounts for an increasing proportion of social wealth, and social wealth is increasingly concentrated in the hands of a few people. Eventually, the gap between the rich and the poor of the whole society is widening. Therefore, it is of great significance to study Marx's critique of private property to solve the problem of distribution of social wealth reasonably. Based on the above thinking, this paper discusses through the following four parts: Introduction, question raising and the significance of studying this topic. This paper analyzes the unreasonable income distribution existing in the current economic development of our country, and leads to the gist of the article, and expounds the theoretical and practical significance of studying Marx's critical thought of private property. The first chapter examines the theoretical source and development process of Marx's critique of private property. Marx's critique of private property mainly comes from the critique of private property of modern bourgeois national economists and utopian socialists. The author points out and proves the scientific nature of Marx's critique of private property by analyzing the shortcomings and defects of their critique of private property. The second chapter focuses on the logical basis, basic content and inevitable conclusion of Marx's critique of private property. The logical basis of Marx's critique of private property was gradually formed through the historical materialism and the theory of labor value founded by Marx. From the perspective of the development of Marx's critique of private property, it runs through Marx's 40 years of theoretical research from his early years to his later years. Marx's critique of private property concluded that "public ownership takes place of private ownership". The third chapter focuses on the contemporary significance of Marx's critique of private property. First, in view of the logic contradiction between "entering the Constitution" and "privatization" of private property in the construction of socialism with Chinese characteristics, we should pursue the future destination of private property in contemporary China. Second, through the text interpretation of Marx's thoughts on private property, and combining with the actual problems faced by private property in our country, we can restore the real essence of Marx's critical thoughts on private property. According to Marx's theoretical demands to explain private property and its related issues. Third, arouse people's keen attention to the contemporary Chinese reality, especially in the specific historical period can correctly guide us with Marx's practical thinking mode and social history theory to solve the important practical problems that need to be solved urgently at present.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：A811

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 豐子義;;馬克思現(xiàn)代性思想的多維透視[J];理論參考;2007年10期

2 張有奎;鄭建斌;;《1844年經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)哲學(xué)手稿》與現(xiàn)代性批判[J];大連干部學(xué)刊;2009年11期

3 崔戰(zhàn)偉;;試論我國私有財(cái)產(chǎn)的法律保護(hù)[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年09期

4 張愛豐;;馬克思主義經(jīng)典作家論私有財(cái)產(chǎn)[J];甘肅聯(lián)合大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年06期

5 張培培;;馬克思的現(xiàn)代性批判——以《1844年經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)哲學(xué)手稿》為例[J];中共濟(jì)南市委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2008年01期

6 李慧鳳,劉志英;《馬克思主義經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)史》評(píng)介[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)評(píng)論;1996年05期

7 陳正權(quán);勞動(dòng)揚(yáng)棄資本——《1844年經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)哲學(xué)手稿》中的私有制批判[J];集美大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年02期

8 營文中;;論我國私有財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)的合憲性及其意義[J];理論導(dǎo)刊;2008年12期

9 胡緒明;陳學(xué)明;;盧卡奇對(duì)現(xiàn)代性批判的基本路向及價(jià)值[J];理論探索;2007年01期

10 康渝生;;“擁有財(cái)產(chǎn)性收入”與“消滅私有制”——科學(xué)社會(huì)主義的哲學(xué)辨正[J];理論探討;2008年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：1990619