本文選題：中國共產(chǎn)黨 + 黨治國體制�。� 參考：《行政論壇》2017年05期

【摘要】：在現(xiàn)代西方政治學(xué)知識(shí)體系中,早先源自古希臘對(duì)權(quán)力運(yùn)行方式進(jìn)行劃分的多樣化政體分類方式,經(jīng)過有意識(shí)的改頭換面,慢慢演化為民主體制與專制(威權(quán))體制兩種對(duì)立的政體類型判定方式與學(xué)術(shù)話語敘事模式,并武斷地將共產(chǎn)黨執(zhí)政的國家劃歸為需要向民主體制轉(zhuǎn)型的威權(quán)體制,造成目前學(xué)術(shù)界流行的西方政治學(xué)理論無以解釋當(dāng)代中國發(fā)展的困境,需要重新反思和系統(tǒng)重構(gòu)。中國共產(chǎn)黨將馬克思列寧主義與近代中國實(shí)際相結(jié)合,走出一條"黨建國體制"的新路�；隈R克思主義關(guān)于社會(huì)主義政治制度體系的原則勾畫、蘇聯(lián)政治體制的示范作用、國民黨"黨治國體制"的經(jīng)驗(yàn)教訓(xùn)、中國共產(chǎn)黨關(guān)于革命與建設(shè)的自我創(chuàng)造等綜合因素,在執(zhí)政黨、國家政權(quán)機(jī)關(guān)與社會(huì)團(tuán)體的關(guān)系建構(gòu)方面,中國共產(chǎn)黨形成并實(shí)行高度集權(quán)的黨的一元化領(lǐng)導(dǎo)方式的"黨治國體制"。由于執(zhí)政黨、國家政權(quán)機(jī)關(guān)與社會(huì)團(tuán)體的功能不一,其所適應(yīng)的法律與規(guī)范有別,如何規(guī)范三者彼此的關(guān)系,形成有序運(yùn)作機(jī)制以及制度化運(yùn)作模式,一直是"黨治國體制"未能徹底解決的問題。改革開放近四十年來,中國共產(chǎn)黨通過以責(zé)任、效率、理性與法治為核心的漸進(jìn)式制度化改造與價(jià)值性建設(shè),逐步實(shí)現(xiàn)了從"黨治國體制"向"黨興國體制"的轉(zhuǎn)型,而"兩個(gè)一百年奮斗目標(biāo)"和"全面深化改革的總目標(biāo)"則標(biāo)志"黨興國體制"的生成,其內(nèi)涵為建構(gòu)一個(gè)集基于發(fā)展目標(biāo)的"發(fā)展—領(lǐng)導(dǎo)型體制"與基于實(shí)現(xiàn)發(fā)展目標(biāo)的制度化運(yùn)作模式的"使命—責(zé)任型體制"于一體的復(fù)合型體制。"黨興國體制"的有效運(yùn)行,尚有賴于作為領(lǐng)導(dǎo)力量與主體建設(shè)力量兼具主體理性的使命型政黨的理論創(chuàng)新與全面建構(gòu)。
[Abstract]:In the knowledge system of modern western political science, the system of diverse regimes, which originated in ancient Greece in dividing the way power operates, has been consciously transformed. It gradually evolved into two opposite types of government, namely, democratic system and autocratic (authoritarian) system, and the narrative mode of academic discourse, and arbitrarily classified the ruling state of the Communist Party as an authoritarian system that needed to be transformed into a democratic system. As a result, the popular theories of western political science can not explain the predicament of the development of contemporary China, so we need to rethink and reconstruct the system. The Communist Party of China combines Marxism-Leninism with the reality of modern China. Based on the principles outlined by Marxism on the socialist political system, the exemplary role of the Soviet political system, the experience and lessons of the Kuomintang's "party governing system," and the Communist Party of China's self-creation of revolution and construction, and so on, In the construction of the relationship between the ruling party, the organs of state power and social organizations, the Communist Party of China forms and implements the "party governing system" of the highly centralized party's unified leadership style. Due to the different functions of the ruling party, the organs of state power and the social organizations, the laws and norms they adapt to are different. How to standardize the relations among the three parties, form an orderly operation mechanism and an institutionalized operation mode, It has always been a problem that the Party's governing system has failed to solve thoroughly. In the past forty years of reform and opening up, the Communist Party of China has gradually realized the transition from "party governing system" to "party rejuvenation system" through the gradual institutionalization transformation and value construction with responsibility, efficiency, rationality and rule of law as the core. The "two hundred years' goals" and "the overall goal of comprehensively deepening reform" symbolize the emergence of the "Party's rejuvenation of the country" system. Its connotation is to construct a complex system of "development-leadership system" based on development goal and "mission-responsibility system" which is based on the institutionalized operation mode of realizing development goal. " The effective operation of the Party's system of rejuvenating the country still depends on the theoretical innovation and overall construction of the mission-oriented political party, which is both the leading force and the main body building force.
【作者單位】： 復(fù)旦大學(xué)國際關(guān)系與公共事務(wù)學(xué)院;
【基金】：國家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金重大項(xiàng)目“包容性公民文化權(quán)利視角下統(tǒng)籌城鄉(xiāng)文化一體化發(fā)展新格局研究”(12&ZD021)
【分類號(hào)】：D25

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉炳香;關(guān)于黨的執(zhí)政能力建設(shè)的幾個(gè)問題[J];政策;2004年07期

2 吳新葉;黨的基層執(zhí)政與和諧社會(huì)的構(gòu)建[J];黨政論壇;2005年09期

3 葛海彥;;中國共產(chǎn)黨依法執(zhí)政的路徑選擇[J];中央社會(huì)主義學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年06期

4 李晉生;;怎樣理解“民主是法制的前提和基礎(chǔ),法制是民主的體現(xiàn)和保障”?[J];學(xué)習(xí)與研究;1990年07期

5 連志慧,武雪周;論依法執(zhí)政[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2005年03期

6 賈松青;社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型時(shí)期加強(qiáng)黨的執(zhí)政能力建設(shè)的思考[J];領(lǐng)導(dǎo)科學(xué);2004年20期

7 尹長海;;依法執(zhí)政與構(gòu)建社會(huì)主義和諧社會(huì)[J];邵陽學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年01期

8 胡序杭;黨的執(zhí)政方式科學(xué)化的意義及基本要求[J];中共杭州市委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2004年05期

9 李敏,程洪寶;依法執(zhí)政:提高黨的執(zhí)政能力的關(guān)鍵環(huán)節(jié)[J];寧波廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2005年02期

10 張俊杰;;中國共產(chǎn)黨執(zhí)政體系中的黨組制度分析[J];安徽工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年04期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前5條

1 宜賓縣政協(xié)主席 陶天華;淺析協(xié)商民主與踐行群眾路線[N];四川政協(xié)報(bào);2014年

2 延邊州委黨校 劉在華;協(xié)商民主與黨的群眾路線[N];延邊日?qǐng)?bào)(漢);2014年

3 劉靖北 中國浦東干部學(xué)院科研部主任 教授;黨的群眾路線在政治領(lǐng)域的重要體現(xiàn)[N];組織人事報(bào);2013年

4 記者 馬廷剛;市委常委會(huì)開展教育實(shí)踐活動(dòng)第一次集體學(xué)習(xí)[N];濰坊日?qǐng)?bào);2014年

5 袁秋年;“我是誰、為了誰、依靠誰”是重大而現(xiàn)實(shí)的問題[N];揚(yáng)州日?qǐng)?bào);2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：1807342