本文關(guān)鍵詞： 民族主義 馬克思主義 民族運(yùn)動 無產(chǎn)階級革命　出處：《中國邊疆史地研究》2017年03期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：馬克思主義經(jīng)典作家對于民族主義的完整立場是批判、借助和吸納,這在馬克思和恩格斯那里已表現(xiàn)得非常鮮明。他們對"狹隘的民族主義感情"和"利己的民族主義情緒"的批評,對"民族沙文主義"和"泛斯拉夫主義"的揭露和批判,對1848年革命、波蘭、愛爾蘭和亞洲民族運(yùn)動的支持等,都貫穿著這一點(diǎn)。然而,無論批判還是借助吸納經(jīng)典作家始終著眼的都是無產(chǎn)階級革命這一根本利益。反對民族壓迫,推動建立和維護(hù)統(tǒng)一的民族國家是19世紀(jì)中期歐洲資產(chǎn)階級民主革命的中心環(huán)節(jié),也是無產(chǎn)階級革命的時代使命。馬克思恩格斯一分為二對待民族主義的態(tài)度,決不能視其為機(jī)會主義,因?yàn)轳R克思恩格斯關(guān)于民族主義的論述始終堅(jiān)守的是無產(chǎn)階級革命立場,也始終充溢著社會正義和人類道義。無產(chǎn)階級可以與民族主義有合作、有借助,但絕不能喪失自己的立場、放棄根本的階級利益,這在馬克思恩格斯那里做得無可挑剔。
[Abstract]:Marx and Engels is critical for the full position of nationalism, borrowing and absorption of which Marx and Engels have been very distinctive. Their "nationalism" and "selfish narrow nationalism" criticism, criticism of the "national chauvinistic" and "Pan Slavism" on 1848, revolution, Poland, Irish national movement and Asian support, runs through this point. However, no matter the criticism or by absorbing classical writers always focus are the fundamental interests of the proletariat revolution. Opposing ethnic oppression, promote the establishment and maintenance of a unified nation is a central part of the mid nineteenth Century the European bourgeois democratic revolution, but also the mission of the era of proletarian revolution. Marx Engels treated One divides into two. nationalism, cannot be regarded as opportunism, because the horse Engels Marx discusses on nationalism of the proletarian revolution is always adhere to the position, is always filled with social justice and human morality. The proletariat can cooperate, and with the help of nationalism, but never lost his position, abandon the fundamental interests of the class, of which Marx Engels there was impeccable.

【作者單位】： 中國社會科學(xué)院民族學(xué)與人類學(xué)研究所;
【分類號】：A81;D032

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 李愛華;;恩格斯為什么否定泛斯拉夫主義民族運(yùn)動[J];世界民族;2009年02期

2 孫軍;;對恩格斯關(guān)于斯拉夫民族歷史命運(yùn)論斷的再思考[J];大連大學(xué)學(xué)報;2013年05期

，

本文編號：1509773