本文關(guān)鍵詞： 民族概念 邏輯分析 民族研究 話語權(quán)　出處：《云南民族大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：民族是人類社會(huì)中最普遍而又最基本的人們共同體，自身形成發(fā)展演化具有客觀實(shí)在性，而反映這一社會(huì)現(xiàn)象的民族定義就其嚴(yán)密性和科學(xué)性存在頗多爭(zhēng)議。長(zhǎng)期以來，我國(guó)學(xué)術(shù)界研究普遍的情況是囿于斯大林有關(guān)民族的論述，思維形式始終圍繞著民族特征要素加以發(fā)揮而鮮有突破。毋容置疑，學(xué)術(shù)術(shù)語或概念的形成不可避免地體現(xiàn)著人類社會(huì)不同歷史階段、不同社會(huì)、甚至具有不同價(jià)值觀的人們對(duì)它的理解和闡釋。而民族概念如何真正反映民族這一客觀實(shí)體，這不僅影響著民族理論學(xué)科體系建設(shè)和發(fā)展，更重要在于明確學(xué)科研究的重點(diǎn)和根本任務(wù)。本文將漢語“民族”概念邏輯分析樹立于民族過程的客觀規(guī)律基礎(chǔ)上加以概括民族本質(zhì)特征的哲學(xué)方法論，，以科學(xué)認(rèn)知民族這一客觀存在為邏輯起點(diǎn)，繼而探討中國(guó)化的馬克思主義民族理論和馬克思主義民族理論中國(guó)化。第一章回顧了漢語“民族”概念的由來和演化的基本脈絡(luò)；第二章梳理前輩漢語“民族”概念的含義與界定研究成果；第三章重在分析漢語“民族”概念的特點(diǎn)與邏輯結(jié)構(gòu)，論述漢語“民族”概念邏輯分析哲學(xué)方法論；第四章主要是針對(duì)漢語“民族”概念與中國(guó)特色的民族研究邏輯關(guān)系進(jìn)行梳理和闡述。以民族的本質(zhì)屬性為民族理論研究的邏輯起點(diǎn)，從而揭示現(xiàn)象的起源、本質(zhì)和發(fā)展規(guī)律，并力求加以理論概括，是民族理論學(xué)科研究既要加強(qiáng)基礎(chǔ)理論研究又要重視應(yīng)用研究方法論，而且在兩者結(jié)合的基礎(chǔ)上把重點(diǎn)放到了現(xiàn)實(shí)的民族研究上來，富有民族研究者必須具有的歷史使命和重大責(zé)任，這對(duì)于正確領(lǐng)悟中國(guó)化的馬克思主義民族理論和科學(xué)駕馭馬克思主義民族理論中國(guó)化發(fā)展規(guī)律有著更為一般的意義。作為馬克思主義民族理論中國(guó)化發(fā)展和創(chuàng)新研究上溯幾千年本土民族思想文化傳統(tǒng)，符合擁有五千年悠久綿長(zhǎng)文化的中華民族歷史坐標(biāo)和定位。在世界的廣闊視野展示了中國(guó)自己鮮明的主體性立場(chǎng)，有益于在全球語境下我國(guó)民族理論研究和學(xué)術(shù)交流過程中的話語權(quán)。
[Abstract]:The nation is the most common and basic human community in human society, and its own formation, development and evolution is objective and realistic. The definition of nationality which reflects this social phenomenon has many controversies on its strictness and scientificalness. For a long time, the general situation of academic research in our country is confined to Stalin's exposition on ethnic groups. There is no doubt that the formation of academic terms or concepts inevitably reflects the different historical stages and different societies of human society. Even people with different values understand and interpret it, and how the concept of nationality really reflects the objective entity of nationality not only affects the construction and development of the discipline system of ethnic theory. It is more important to make clear the emphasis and fundamental task of the subject research. This paper sets the logic analysis of Chinese "nation" concept on the basis of the objective law of the national process to generalize the philosophical methodology of the essential characteristics of the nation. Taking the objective existence of scientific cognition nation as the logical starting point. The first chapter reviews the origin and evolution of the concept of "nationality" in Chinese. The second chapter combs the meaning and the definition research result of the predecessor Chinese "nationality" concept; The third chapter focuses on the analysis of the characteristics and logical structure of the concept of "nationality" in Chinese, and discusses the philosophical methodology of logic analysis of the concept of "nationality" in Chinese. Chapter 4th mainly deals with the relationship between the concept of "nationality" in Chinese and the logic of ethnic study with Chinese characteristics. Taking the essential attribute of nationality as the logical starting point of the study of national theory, it reveals the origin of the phenomenon. The essence and the law of development, and try to sum up the theory, is that the research of ethnic theory should not only strengthen the basic theoretical research but also attach importance to the applied research methodology. And on the basis of the combination of the two to focus on the reality of ethnic research, rich ethnic researchers must have the historical mission and major responsibilities. This is of more general significance for correctly understanding the Sinicization of the Marxist national theory and scientifically governing the development law of the Sinicization of the Marxist national theory. Development and Innovation of the Marxist National Theory in China. The study goes back thousands of years native nation thought culture tradition. In line with the historical coordinates and positioning of the Chinese nation, which has a long and long culture of five thousand years, the broad vision of the world shows China's own distinct position of subjectivity. It is beneficial to the right of speech in the course of national theory research and academic exchange in the global context.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：云南民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：A811;D633

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 馬戎;理解民族關(guān)系的新思路——少數(shù)族群?jiǎn)栴}的“去政治化”[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年06期

2 納日碧力戈;問難“族群”[J];廣西民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年01期

3 侯哲安;;論民族一詞的科學(xué)涵義[J];貴州社會(huì)科學(xué);1981年02期

4 都永浩;;對(duì)民族共同體的多維思考[J];黑龍江民族叢刊;2008年05期

5 何叔濤;;對(duì)20世紀(jì)在中國(guó)最有影響的三大民族定義的簡(jiǎn)要評(píng)析[J];黑龍江民族叢刊;2009年04期

6 林耀華;;關(guān)于“民族”一詞的使用和譯名的問題[J];歷史研究;1963年02期

7 張儒;李曉暉;;費(fèi)孝通談“民族”[J];中國(guó)民族;1986年06期

8 金炳鎬;;試論斯大林民族定義的特點(diǎn)[J];廣西民族研究;1987年01期

9 牙含章;論民族[J];民族研究;1982年05期

10 熊錫元;風(fēng)俗習(xí)慣應(yīng)否列為民族構(gòu)成要素?——關(guān)于民族定義的一點(diǎn)看法[J];民族研究;1983年01期

本文編號(hào)：1452847