本文關(guān)鍵詞：城市視域中的馬克思主義社會(huì)空間理論初探，由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。

        空間在思想史中經(jīng)歷了不同的命運(yùn)。當(dāng)進(jìn)入到馬克思主義理論時(shí),空間成為一個(gè)不可缺失的維度,但由于不同需求,空間在馬克思主義理論研究中或隱或顯的展示出來(lái)。為了能清晰的把新、老馬克思主義中的空間思想／理論梳理出來(lái),本文借助歷史唯物主義體系內(nèi)的廣義和狹義兩個(gè)向度作為梳理框架。并在梳理之后進(jìn)行比較,從中得出對(duì)當(dāng)今社會(huì)的啟示。具體來(lái)說(shuō),文章共分為四個(gè)部分：第一部分首先回顧了空間在思想史上的不同認(rèn)知,并討論了在步入馬克思主義視域之后所經(jīng)歷的“待遇”以及目前國(guó)內(nèi)外的研究狀況。在馬克思主義理論中,空間不僅獲得了“應(yīng)有”的“地位”(不僅在理論地位上得到重視,而且受到了一個(gè)合理的,科學(xué)的重視),而且內(nèi)容更加豐富。同時(shí),為了完成本文對(duì)馬克思主義理論中的空間思想進(jìn)行挖掘、梳理和理解的要旨,在這之前,做了兩方面的準(zhǔn)備工作：一方面指出了作為馬克思主義空間思想的理論背景,同時(shí)也是理論切入口的城市性概念,另一方面在此基礎(chǔ)上,以歷史唯物主義的廣義和狹義兩個(gè)向度為框架,去進(jìn)入到馬克思主義社會(huì)空間的探索。最后明確了本文寫(xiě)作的意義。第二部分具體地進(jìn)入到馬克思主義經(jīng)典作家的空間思想的梳理工作時(shí)分別從廣義歷史唯物主義和狹義歷史唯物主義兩個(gè)視角進(jìn)行的。在廣義歷史唯物主義平臺(tái)上,以唯物主義歷史觀為原則,認(rèn)識(shí)了作為人類(lèi)的生存空間的社會(huì)空間是如何生成的。并以城市為理論載體,來(lái)梳理在生產(chǎn)方式的基礎(chǔ)上,人類(lèi)社會(huì)空問(wèn)形態(tài)的歷史變化。在狹義歷史唯物主義平臺(tái)上,梳理了在資本主義生產(chǎn)中空間的意義,并以城市住宅問(wèn)題為例,指出在資本主義的全面統(tǒng)治下,表現(xiàn)出的具體的空間問(wèn)題。第三部分介紹了在新時(shí)期理論界發(fā)生了空間轉(zhuǎn)向,空間不再是被隱性的表達(dá)出來(lái),而成為一個(gè)顯性概念�？臻g作為直接的理論對(duì)象而被討論,這是和新時(shí)期,城市化在全球展開(kāi)的境遇相關(guān)的。直接討論城市已經(jīng)不能完全說(shuō)明問(wèn)題,而需要從空間的維度對(duì)新時(shí)代全球社會(huì)展開(kāi)討論。從廣義歷史唯物主義來(lái)看,列斐伏爾的“空間生產(chǎn)”升級(jí)了歷史唯物主義理論體系。從狹義歷史唯物主義來(lái)看,大衛(wèi)·哈維則從空間的維度上,以資本積累為核心,貫穿了全球地理景觀的變化。并最終從空間的角度探討了人類(lèi)的解放,實(shí)現(xiàn)了廣義和狹義某種意義上的結(jié)合。第四部分對(duì)馬克思主義空間思想在廣義和狹義兩個(gè)向度上的邏輯切換以及新馬克思城市學(xué)者們對(duì)馬克思主義經(jīng)典作家在城市視域中的空間思想/理論上的升級(jí)和重新闡發(fā)進(jìn)行比較和總結(jié),并指出這種理論中的邏輯轉(zhuǎn)換及思想的傳承發(fā)展對(duì)當(dāng)今世界性問(wèn)題本質(zhì)的揭示和對(duì)中國(guó)空間規(guī)劃的啟示。

    Space was recognized in different ways in the history of ideas. When coming into the sphere of Marxist theory, space became an obbligato dimension. However, according to various demands, space was employed either in the implicit ways or in the explicit way. In order to ravel the ideas/theories of space in the Marxist and Neo-Marxist theories,the paper applies the both single-dimensions--broad sense and narrow sense--of historical materialism as the frame. And after the spatial ideas raveled out, they are compared then. The paper hope the comparative analysis can enlighten the current social practice. The whole paper was arranged into4parts following:The first part is the preparation for the whole paper, which first reviews the different recognitions of space, and then discusses the situation of space in Marxist theory, in which space not only deserves a due position, but also acquires more connotations. And ahead of raveling out the spatial ideas in the following parts, paper makes a full preparation---the theoretical point-cut and the theoretical frame. In the end of the past,the significance of the paper is revealed.The second part gets down to ravel out the spatial ideas in classical Marxist authors’works. The job was worked respectively on broad sense and narrow sense of historical materialism.On the broad sense, the issues of how the human’s living space -social space-was created and how the spatial form changes according to the processing modes of production in the human’s history are raveled out. On the narrow sense, the importance of space for the capitalist economy was told, and the spatial problems in the capitalist society was asked.The third part presents the spatial conversion in the idea realm. At then,space, as a direct object, was no longer expressed in the invisible way, but in the visible way instead. And the conversion is relevant to the urbanization in the global sphere. In this condition, it is impossible to explain the spatial issues by discussing the urban/city. Instead, it is due to discuss the global society of the new time. On the broad sense of historical materialism, the concept of "production of space" from Henry Lefebvre promoted the traditional historical materialism up-grading. On the narrow sense, David Harvey described the changes of geographical landscape under the control of capital accumulation on the spatial dimension, and finally Harvey probed the human’s liberation from the angle of space, connecting the broad and narrow sense of historical materialism in a certain sense.The forth part is the last part, which compares and concludes not only the logical shift of the broad sense and narrow sense,but also the connection and conversion between classical Marxist author and Neo-Marxist schools of urban. And with the help of the findings, the paper tries to obtain some enlightenment for exploring the essence of the current cosmopolitan issues, and for refreshing the city’s landscaping planning.

城市視域中的馬克思主義社會(huì)空間理論初探

摘要3-5Abstract5-6第一章 導(dǎo)論8-21    1.1 “空間”在思想史上的命運(yùn)及研究現(xiàn)狀綜述8-10    1.2 馬克思主義空間思想的現(xiàn)實(shí)背景和理論入口10-14    1.3 馬克思主義空間思想梳理框架：廣義和狹義雙重向度14-19    1.4 馬克思主義空間思想的研究意義19-21第二章 經(jīng)典馬克思主義理論中社會(huì)空間思想的發(fā)掘21-35    2.1 廣義歷史唯物主義向度上的空間思想22-29        2.1.1 人類(lèi)空間的建構(gòu)：人化自然22-24        2.1.2 生產(chǎn)方式(分工)對(duì)于空間形態(tài)的塑造24-29    2.2 狹義歷史唯物主義向度上的空間思想29-35        2.2.1 資本主義生產(chǎn)領(lǐng)域中空間的能動(dòng)性30-32        2.2.2 資本主義社會(huì)典型的生存空間問(wèn)題32-35第三章 馬克思主義空間理論的研究典范——新馬克思主義城市學(xué)派35-53    3.1 新馬克思主義城市學(xué)派空間理論產(chǎn)生的背景35-37    3.2 新馬克思主義城市空間理論中廣義和狹義向度37-38    3.3 (社會(huì))空間生產(chǎn)理論：廣義歷史唯物主義的空間改造38-44    3.4 資本積累的空間外現(xiàn)：狹義歷史唯物主義的空間闡發(fā)44-48    3.5 “不平衡空間發(fā)展”到“希望的空間”：狹義向廣義的展望48-53第四章 結(jié)論53-62    4.1 馬克思主義空間思想的視角轉(zhuǎn)變和向度切換53-55    4.2 “城市”和“空間”范疇在空間思想中的地位轉(zhuǎn)換55-57    4.3 新馬克思主義對(duì)傳統(tǒng)馬克思主義空間思想的升華57-58    4.4 馬克思主義空間思想發(fā)展的現(xiàn)實(shí)性啟示58-62參考文獻(xiàn)62-66后記66-68

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：城市視域中的馬克思主義社會(huì)空間理論初探，由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。