【摘要】：通過關(guān)注語境化拓展的問題,文章探討了語用論辯理論如何對論證的分析與評價等研究范式予以發(fā)展,進而更為精致地處理真實論證實踐在特定情境下的復雜特性。首先,根據(jù)不同的發(fā)展階段,對語用論辯的標準理論和擴展理論予以概要性介紹。其次,分別梳理會話性語境和制度性語境在這兩個階段的具體介入方式。繼而,借助學術(shù)領(lǐng)域的一個案例分析,直觀展示了在特定制度性語境下進行典型論證模式分析的主要程序。最后,基于語用論辯理論的語境化拓展,探討了相應(yīng)的合理性評價問題。
[Abstract]:By paying attention to the problem of situational expansion, this paper discusses how pragmatic argumentation theory develops the research paradigm such as the analysis and evaluation of argumentation, and then deals with the complex characteristics of real argumentation practice in a specific situation. First of all, according to different stages of development, the standard theory and extension theory of pragmatic argument are briefly introduced. Secondly, it combs the specific intervention modes of conversational context and institutional context in these two stages. Then, with the help of a case study in the academic field, this paper intuitively shows the main procedures of typical argumentation mode analysis in a specific institutional context. Finally, based on the contextual expansion of pragmatic argumentation theory, the corresponding rationality evaluation is discussed.
【作者單位】： 中山大學哲學系;
【基金】：教育部哲學社會科學重大攻關(guān)項目資助(項目編號:10JZD0006) 國家社科基金青年項目資助(項目編號:16CZX053)
【分類號】：B811
，

本文編號：2499432