【摘要】：重點討論群體決策的理性可接受性問題。在以討論"可行能力"為核心的理性選擇理論范疇下,提出了一種群體理性可接受性的概念,它既避免了將群體作為個體抽象物進行重建的弊端,又對經(jīng)典的群體判斷聚合困境提供了比較合理的解決途徑;但同時發(fā)現(xiàn),這樣的群體理性條件導致一些違反人們?nèi)后w決策常識的問題出現(xiàn),比如,它為少數(shù)決定制的群體決策規(guī)則做出了合理性辯護。進一步刻畫群體決策規(guī)則合理性和群體決策結(jié)果合理性之間的不一致性,對于判斷聚合理論、協(xié)商民主理論,以及如何在多元社會現(xiàn)實背景下實現(xiàn)共識具有積極的理論意義和現(xiàn)實意義。
[Abstract]:This paper focuses on the rational acceptability of group decision-making. This paper puts forward a concept of group rational acceptability under the category of rational choice theory, which focuses on the discussion of "feasible ability", which avoids the drawback of rebuilding the group as an individual abstract substance. At the same time, it provides a reasonable way to solve the classical group judgment and aggregation dilemma. But at the same time, it is found that the condition of group rationality leads to some problems that violate people's common sense of group decision-making, for example, it justifies the rule of group decision-making which is customized to minority decision-making. Further characterizing the inconsistency between the rationality of group decision-making rules and the rationality of group decision-making results, for judging aggregation theory and negotiation democracy theory, And how to achieve consensus under the background of multi-social reality has positive theoretical and practical significance.
【作者單位】： 中山大學哲學系、中山大學邏輯與認知研究所;中山大學邏輯與認知研究所;
【基金】：教育部人文社會科學重點研究基地重大項目“廣義非形式邏輯研究”(12JJD720006)
【分類號】：B819

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 官鳴;論科學認識的可接受性[J];廈門大學學報(哲學社會科學版);1993年02期

2 陳曉平;;關(guān)于科學理論的可接受性——歸納和反歸納之爭[J];華南師范大學學報(社會科學版);2007年01期

3 胡毅敏;徐慈華;;類比論證的形式表征與語用維度[J];重慶理工大學學報(社會科學);2011年08期

，

本文編號：2431746