梁?jiǎn)⒊容^邏輯思想探賾
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-12-07 16:36
【摘要】：墨家是先秦重要的學(xué)派之一,墨家著作的總集通稱為《墨子》。這篇著作蘊(yùn)藏著豐富的邏輯思想。深入開掘這些思想對(duì)豐富和更深入全面地理解邏輯學(xué)有重要的意義。梁?jiǎn)⒊乾F(xiàn)代中國(guó)著名學(xué)者,其學(xué)術(shù)研究涉獵甚廣,在哲學(xué)、政治學(xué)、史學(xué)等方面均有突出貢獻(xiàn),他還是中國(guó)現(xiàn)代最早對(duì)墨家邏輯學(xué)說進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)探究的學(xué)者之一。梁?jiǎn)⒊芯磕疫壿嬎枷氲闹饕ぷ髀肪�是,用西方邏輯學(xué)和印度因明的基本概念和理論闡發(fā)和詮釋墨家邏輯學(xué)說的主要內(nèi)容,并在此基礎(chǔ)上對(duì)這三種古老的邏輯學(xué)說進(jìn)行參照、比較和印證。因此,研究梁?jiǎn)⒊谋容^邏輯思想不僅具有重要的理論意義,而且對(duì)弘揚(yáng)中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)文化也有重要的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。 梁?jiǎn)⒊芯磕疫壿媽W(xué)說有豐富的社會(huì)政治、文化和個(gè)人的學(xué)術(shù)修養(yǎng)和興趣等背景。西學(xué)的傳入和他對(duì)中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)文化特別是對(duì)墨家學(xué)說的修為,使得他可以將這兩者結(jié)合起來進(jìn)行研究,結(jié)合點(diǎn)就是對(duì)西方邏輯和墨家的邏輯學(xué)說進(jìn)行比較研究。論文重點(diǎn)考察了梁?jiǎn)⒊P(guān)于墨家邏輯學(xué)說、印度因明和西方亞里士多德邏輯三者之間的共通之處和差異的觀點(diǎn)。在此基礎(chǔ)上,對(duì)梁?jiǎn)⒊谋容^邏輯思想的成就與不足進(jìn)行了簡(jiǎn)要的評(píng)論。梁?jiǎn)⒊_辟了中國(guó)邏輯史的比較研究這一方向,其比較研究方法影響了同時(shí)代及后來的一大批墨學(xué)研究者。但其研究在文化深度和系統(tǒng)性上稍顯欠缺。通過對(duì)梁?jiǎn)⒊容^邏輯研究的成就與不足的考察,力圖得出一些對(duì)中國(guó)邏輯史研究富有啟發(fā)性的建議。 全文共分四個(gè)部分： 第一章,對(duì)梁?jiǎn)⒊容^思想的源起進(jìn)行概述。在國(guó)勢(shì)衰弱的時(shí)代歷史背景和西學(xué)東漸的學(xué)術(shù)思潮背景之下,得惠于孫詒讓的啟發(fā),為促進(jìn)民族之覺醒,增強(qiáng)民族之信心,發(fā)掘墨學(xué)救亡圖存之功效,梁?jiǎn)⒊瑢?duì)《墨子》中蘊(yùn)藏的邏輯思想進(jìn)行了比較研究。這些考察表明梁?jiǎn)⒊容^邏輯思想的產(chǎn)生有其深刻的社會(huì)政治、文化和學(xué)術(shù)動(dòng)因。 第二章,對(duì)梁?jiǎn)⒊谋容^邏輯思想和其關(guān)于墨家邏輯主要內(nèi)容的闡釋進(jìn)行探析。主要從以下四個(gè)方面進(jìn)行闡述：(1)梁?jiǎn)⒊容^邏輯的研究方法。梁?jiǎn)⒊l(fā)比較之先聲對(duì)三大邏輯進(jìn)行比較的主要方法是求同法,求異法,同異兼得法；(2)對(duì)墨家邏輯、印度因明與亞里士多德邏輯的名稱、推理形式、思維規(guī)律的比較分析,表明三者是匯通的；(3)從墨家邏輯、印度因明與亞里士多德邏輯的目的、推理形式、歷史命運(yùn)等方面分析三者的差異；(4)梁?jiǎn)⒊P(guān)于墨家邏輯的基本概念、主要推理形式和歸納認(rèn)識(shí)方法等方面的主要觀點(diǎn)。 第三章,對(duì)梁?jiǎn)⒊谋容^邏輯思想進(jìn)行評(píng)價(jià)。梁?jiǎn)⒊瑢?duì)《墨經(jīng)》邏輯思想的比較研究建構(gòu)了中國(guó)文化史上第一個(gè)較為系統(tǒng)的墨辯邏輯體系,為推動(dòng)和完善墨學(xué)研究作出了貢獻(xiàn),同時(shí)對(duì)促進(jìn)中西文化交流和西方邏輯的傳播和發(fā)揚(yáng)有積極的作用。但受到歷史時(shí)代和邏輯視野等客觀條件的限制,梁?jiǎn)⒊容^邏輯研究在文化深度和兩種邏輯比較的廣度等方面稍有不足。 結(jié)語探討了梁?jiǎn)⒊容^邏輯研究對(duì)中國(guó)邏輯史研究的啟迪。比較的研究方法是深入開展中國(guó)邏輯史研究的重要方法,中國(guó)邏輯史的研究必須堅(jiān)持比較方法和歷史分析方法相結(jié)合的方法論原則。而進(jìn)行比較首先要懂得訓(xùn)詁的方法,要能準(zhǔn)確把握各種邏輯思想的源流,要正確處理個(gè)性與共性、歷時(shí)與共時(shí)的關(guān)系等等。另外,比較邏輯不是獨(dú)立的邏輯學(xué)科,而只是研究邏輯史的一種方法論模式。因此,應(yīng)該正確認(rèn)識(shí)比較邏輯研究中的價(jià)值評(píng)估及其標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。
[Abstract]:Mo's family is one of the important schools in the pre-Qin period, and the general set of Mo's works is generally referred to as" ink ". This work contains rich logic thought. The in-depth study of these thoughts is of great significance to the rich and in-depth and comprehensive understanding of logic. Liang Qichao is a famous scholar in modern China. Its academic research has a wide range of academic research, and has made outstanding contributions in philosophy, politics and history. The main work course of Liang Qichao's study of the logic thought of Mojiujia is to use the basic concepts and theories of western logic and India to explain and interpret the main contents of Mojiism's logic theory, and to make reference, comparison and verification to the three ancient logic theories. Therefore, the study of Liang Qichao's comparative logic thought not only has important theoretical significance, but also has important practical significance to carry forward the traditional Chinese culture. Liang Qichao's study of Mo's logic states that there are rich social and political, cultural and individual academic cultivation and interest. The introduction of siology and his study of the Chinese traditional culture, in particular the theory of Mojiism, make it possible for him to combine the two, which is to make a comparative study of the logic of the western logic and the ink family. The paper focuses on the view of Liang Qichao's view on the logic of Mo, and the common position and difference between Indian and Western Aristotle's logic. On this basis, the achievement and deficiency of Liang Qichao's comparative logic thought are briefly evaluated. On the other hand, Liang Qichao opened up a comparative study on the history of Chinese logic, and the comparative study method has influenced the study of a large number of ink studies in the same era and later. The study is slightly underwritten in terms of cultural depth and systematicness. By comparing the achievements and shortcomings of the study of Liang Qichao's comparative logic, this paper tries to draw some enlightening construction for the study of the logic history of China The full text of which is divided into four Part 1: The source of Liang Qichao's comparative thought From the background of the era of the state of the state and the background of the academic thought of the East of the West, it should be inspired by the Sun, in order to promote the awakening of the nation, to enhance the confidence of the nation, to explore the efficacy of the saving of the exiles of the ink, and to carry out the logic thought contained in the" Mozi ". A comparative study is made. These results show that Liang Qichao's comparative logic thought has its profound social and political, and culture. The second chapter, the comparative logic thought of Liang Qichao and its main content on Moist's logic The interpretation of (1) Liang Qichao is compared with the following four aspects: (1) Liang Qichao's comparison The method of logic study. The main method of comparing the first-to-three logic of Liang Qichao's comparison is to seek the same method, the method of seeking the difference and the method of the same, and (2) to compare the logic of the ink, the name of the logic of the Indian and the Aristotle's logic, the way of reasoning, the comparative analysis of the law of thought, and the table. (4) Liang Qichao's basic concept, main reasoning form and induction and recognition method, etc. The main point of view of the aspect. In chapter 3, the ratio of Liang Qichao to Liang Qichao The comparison between Liang Qichao and the logic thought of Liang Qichao constructed the first more systematic ink-defense logic system in the history of Chinese culture, and made a contribution to the promotion and improvement of the study of ink science, and also promoted the communication between the Chinese and the West and the dissemination of western logic. The study of Liang Qichao's comparative logic is based on the comparison of the cultural depth and the two kinds of logic. The comparison logic of Liang Qichao is discussed in the paper. The enlightenment of the study of Chinese logic history is an important method to carry out the research on the logic history of China. The study of Chinese logic history must adhere to the comparative method and the historical analysis. The methodological principle of the combination of the method is the first to understand the method of the training, to correctly grasp the origin of the various logic thoughts, and to deal with the personality and the general character correctly. In addition, the comparative logic is not an independent logical subject, but only a study The logical history is a kind of methodology mode. Therefore, it is necessary to correctly understand the comparative logic research.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：B81
本文編號(hào)：2367472
[Abstract]:Mo's family is one of the important schools in the pre-Qin period, and the general set of Mo's works is generally referred to as" ink ". This work contains rich logic thought. The in-depth study of these thoughts is of great significance to the rich and in-depth and comprehensive understanding of logic. Liang Qichao is a famous scholar in modern China. Its academic research has a wide range of academic research, and has made outstanding contributions in philosophy, politics and history. The main work course of Liang Qichao's study of the logic thought of Mojiujia is to use the basic concepts and theories of western logic and India to explain and interpret the main contents of Mojiism's logic theory, and to make reference, comparison and verification to the three ancient logic theories. Therefore, the study of Liang Qichao's comparative logic thought not only has important theoretical significance, but also has important practical significance to carry forward the traditional Chinese culture. Liang Qichao's study of Mo's logic states that there are rich social and political, cultural and individual academic cultivation and interest. The introduction of siology and his study of the Chinese traditional culture, in particular the theory of Mojiism, make it possible for him to combine the two, which is to make a comparative study of the logic of the western logic and the ink family. The paper focuses on the view of Liang Qichao's view on the logic of Mo, and the common position and difference between Indian and Western Aristotle's logic. On this basis, the achievement and deficiency of Liang Qichao's comparative logic thought are briefly evaluated. On the other hand, Liang Qichao opened up a comparative study on the history of Chinese logic, and the comparative study method has influenced the study of a large number of ink studies in the same era and later. The study is slightly underwritten in terms of cultural depth and systematicness. By comparing the achievements and shortcomings of the study of Liang Qichao's comparative logic, this paper tries to draw some enlightening construction for the study of the logic history of China The full text of which is divided into four Part 1: The source of Liang Qichao's comparative thought From the background of the era of the state of the state and the background of the academic thought of the East of the West, it should be inspired by the Sun, in order to promote the awakening of the nation, to enhance the confidence of the nation, to explore the efficacy of the saving of the exiles of the ink, and to carry out the logic thought contained in the" Mozi ". A comparative study is made. These results show that Liang Qichao's comparative logic thought has its profound social and political, and culture. The second chapter, the comparative logic thought of Liang Qichao and its main content on Moist's logic The interpretation of (1) Liang Qichao is compared with the following four aspects: (1) Liang Qichao's comparison The method of logic study. The main method of comparing the first-to-three logic of Liang Qichao's comparison is to seek the same method, the method of seeking the difference and the method of the same, and (2) to compare the logic of the ink, the name of the logic of the Indian and the Aristotle's logic, the way of reasoning, the comparative analysis of the law of thought, and the table. (4) Liang Qichao's basic concept, main reasoning form and induction and recognition method, etc. The main point of view of the aspect. In chapter 3, the ratio of Liang Qichao to Liang Qichao The comparison between Liang Qichao and the logic thought of Liang Qichao constructed the first more systematic ink-defense logic system in the history of Chinese culture, and made a contribution to the promotion and improvement of the study of ink science, and also promoted the communication between the Chinese and the West and the dissemination of western logic. The study of Liang Qichao's comparative logic is based on the comparison of the cultural depth and the two kinds of logic. The comparison logic of Liang Qichao is discussed in the paper. The enlightenment of the study of Chinese logic history is an important method to carry out the research on the logic history of China. The study of Chinese logic history must adhere to the comparative method and the historical analysis. The methodological principle of the combination of the method is the first to understand the method of the training, to correctly grasp the origin of the various logic thoughts, and to deal with the personality and the general character correctly. In addition, the comparative logic is not an independent logical subject, but only a study The logical history is a kind of methodology mode. Therefore, it is necessary to correctly understand the comparative logic research.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：B81
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條
1 彭汶;試論梁?jiǎn)⒊瑢?duì)墨家邏輯、印度因明和西方邏輯的對(duì)比研究[J];青海社會(huì)科學(xué);1987年02期
，本文編號(hào)：2367472
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/ljx/2367472.html
最近更新
教材專著
