發(fā)布時間：2018-10-29 16:19

【摘要】：論文系統(tǒng)介紹和研究了因明的各個論式，并將新因明的核心問題——三支論式與古代中國的三物邏輯進行了比較研究： 首先，因明的各個論式都有自己的特點。十支論式含有更多的論辯方面的東西，實用性比較強。五支論式雖有重復的成分存在，但已內(nèi)含演繹的因素，為后來陳那的三支論式做了必要的理論準備。新因明的論式主要是陳那的三支論式，再就是法稱修訂的二支論式。因為三支論式是新因明的核心，所以論文對三支論式進行了重點分析。論文著重對三支論式諸種說法進行了分析探討，指出了各說的不合理之處，并試圖找到能夠表達三支論式的正確形式。包括形式蘊涵的肯定式及否定式；全稱量詞銷去之后充分條件假言推理的肯定前件式及否定后件式。法稱的二支論式將喻歸于因中，邏輯性更強。 其次，因明論式從十支簡化為五支，這一變化有一定原因。論文對此進行了分析探討，指出這與它所依存的社會背景息息相關。另外，針對陳那改五支為三支和法稱改三支為二支的情況，，論文作了詳細的分析，并指出在這一過程中論式的非演繹性因素逐漸減少，演繹性因素逐漸增多。 最后，將三支論式與三物邏輯進行了比較研究，分析了比較研究的意義，并指出二者的異同。得出了以下結(jié)論：三支論式雖然不如亞氏三段論格式復雜多樣，但比三物邏輯的格式要豐富的多，形式化程度要高于三物邏輯。
[Abstract]:This paper systematically introduces and studies each theory of Inmin, and makes a comparative study of the core problem of New Inmin, the three-branch theory, and the three-substance logic of ancient China: first, each of InMing's theoretical forms has its own characteristics. Ten-branch theory contains more argumentative aspects of things, more practical. Although there are repeated elements in the five-branch theory, it contains deductive factors, which makes necessary theoretical preparation for Chen Na's three-branch theory. Xinyin-Ming's theory is mainly three-branch theory of Chen Na, and the two-branch theory of law-called revision. Because the three-branch theory is the core of the new cause-Ming, this paper focuses on the three-branch theory. This paper focuses on the analysis and discussion of the three branches theory, points out the irrationality of each theory, and tries to find the correct form which can express the three branches theory. It includes the positive and negative forms of formal implication and the positive and negative forms of positive and negative hypothetical reasoning after the elimination of full quantifiers. It is more logical for the two branches of the French term to attribute metaphor to the cause. Secondly, the formula of Indemnity is simplified from ten to five, and there are some reasons for this change. This paper analyzes and discusses this and points out that it is closely related to the social background on which it depends. In addition, in view of the situation that Chen Na changed five branches into three branches and France changed three branches into two branches, the paper makes a detailed analysis, and points out that in this process, the non-deductive factors of the theoretical form gradually decrease, and the deductive factors gradually increase. In the end, the author makes a comparative study of the three-branch theory and the three-substance logic, analyzes the significance of the comparative study, and points out the similarities and differences between the two. The following conclusions are drawn: although the three-branch theory is not as complex as the Asiatic syllogism, it is much richer than the three-object logic, and its formalization degree is higher than that of the three-object logic.
【學位授予單位】：燕山大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：B81-093.51

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 姚南強;因明的歷史發(fā)展及其貢獻[J];華東師范大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2000年06期

2 傅光全;簡論羅素的形式蘊涵[J];海南大學學報(人文社會科學版);2005年03期

3 祁順來;;論陳那和法稱對因明學說的貢獻[J];青海民族學院學報(社會科學版);2007年01期

4 祁順來;;論因明論式中的“喻”[J];青海民族學院學報;2009年04期

5 孫麗娜;;從“論式”看因明的邏輯性質(zhì)[J];黔南民族師范學院學報;2008年01期

6 楊百順;印度邏輯論式的演變及其與西方推論式略比[J];人文雜志;1985年05期

7 張忠義;從“定有”看“同品定有性”[J];社會科學輯刊;1987年03期

8 張忠義;;因明的“合離”與“分離規(guī)則”[J];社會科學戰(zhàn)線;1992年03期

9 阿旺丹增;陳那新因明的論式支分探究[J];西藏大學學報(漢文版);1998年03期

10 拉巴次旦;;試析邏輯三段論與三支論式在因明學教學中的比較運用[J];西藏大學學報(漢文版);2007年04期

相關會議論文 前1條

1 周文英;;因明在印度的發(fā)生和發(fā)展[A];因明論文集[C];1980年

本文編號：2298193