先秦名家論辯思想探析
發(fā)布時間：2018-10-13 11:34
【摘要】：本文主要是對先秦名家的論辯思想加以考察和探究。先秦名家包括鄧析、惠施、公孫龍等人,他們提出頗具爭議性的辯題和開創(chuàng)性的論辯思想。但由于鄧析、惠施等資料的部分丟失,因此學(xué)者對名家的論辯思想研究眾說紛紜,仁者見仁,智者見智。通過分析前人的思想以及對原著的研究,我提出了一些個人觀點。 本文總體分為四個部分。第一部分是對先秦名家產(chǎn)生的背景以及論辯特點的闡述。名家的產(chǎn)生是具有歷史必然性的,由于政治、經(jīng)濟、教育等多方面的原因,人們的思路開始拓寬,對生活進行思考。論辯特點的闡述有利于了解名家的思維方式、思考模式,以及名家所探討和關(guān)注的主要內(nèi)容。 第二部分是在前人分析和總結(jié)名家論辯思想的基礎(chǔ)上,重新對這些辯題進行分類。將辯題分為六類,即關(guān)系之辯、相對之辯、名名之辯、潛實之辯、離堅自之辯以及動止之辯。通過這些分類,可以了解到名家的討論內(nèi)容以及名家的興趣之所在。這些分類也反映了名家對常識、常理的思考和反思。 第三部分是對名家所提出的辯的理論內(nèi)容、論辯的方法、論辯的要求等的較為詳細的闡述和總結(jié)。通過對名家的一些論辯故事的分析,可以總結(jié)出一些有關(guān)論辯的方法和要求。名家雖然對這些要求和方法沒有理論化,但是卻影響了很多的學(xué)派,使得辯學(xué)更為豐富。 第四部分是闡述名家所產(chǎn)生的深遠意義。名家的論辯思想不但促成了辯的興起、推動了辯的發(fā)展、拓寬了辯的領(lǐng)域、豐富了辯的技巧,而且還拓寬了人們的思路,倡導(dǎo)了辯證思維、逆向思維等。最重要的是名家的論辯思想推動了邏輯的發(fā)展,在這些看似是詭辯的辯題中開啟了邏輯的新篇章。 本文的創(chuàng)新之處在于對名家辯題的新分類。從論辯的角度出發(fā),將辯題分為六類,從而了解名家的思想源泉和素材,看到名家的思考脈絡(luò)以及思考的領(lǐng)域。另外就是通過這些分析可以使更多的人了解名家,消除對名家的誤解,駁斥其他學(xué)派對名家的批判。名家的“奇談”、“怪論”并不是詭辯,而是借此為人們打開更為寬闊的思路,使人們開始關(guān)注生活,反思常識,進而改善思維方法。
[Abstract]:This article is mainly to examine and explore the debate thought of the famous scholars in pre-Qin Dynasty. Famous scholars in the pre-Qin Dynasty included Deng analysis, Hui Shi, Gong Sun long and others, who put forward controversial debate and groundbreaking argumentation. However, due to the partial loss of materials such as Deng analysis and Hui Shi, scholars have different opinions on the debate thought of famous scholars. By analyzing the ideas of predecessors and the study of the original works, I put forward some personal views. This paper is divided into four parts. The first part is about the background and the characteristics of the debate. Due to political, economic, educational and other reasons, people began to broaden their thinking and think about life. The elaboration of the argumentative characteristics is beneficial to the understanding of the thinking mode, and the main contents of the famous scholars. The second part reclassifies these arguments on the basis of analyzing and summing up the ideas of famous scholars. The debate is divided into six categories, namely, the debate of relation, the debate of relative, the argument of name and name, the debate of subdued truth, the argument of separation from firmness and the debate of action. Through these classifications, we can understand the discussion content and the interest of famous scholars. These classifications also reflect the reflection and reflection of famous scholars on common sense and common sense. The third part is a more detailed elaboration and summary of the theoretical content, methods and requirements of the debate put forward by famous scholars. Through the analysis of some argumentative stories of famous scholars, we can summarize some methods and requirements of argumentation. Although famous scholars have not theorized these requirements and methods, they have influenced many schools of thought and made the theory of argumentation more abundant. The fourth part is to expound the profound significance of famous writers. The debate thought of famous scholars not only promoted the rise of debate, promoted the development of debate, broadened the field of debate, enriched the skills of debate, but also broadened people's thinking, advocated dialectical thinking, reverse thinking, etc. The most important thing is that the argumentative thoughts of famous scholars promote the development of logic and open a new chapter of logic in these seemingly sophistry debates. The innovation of this paper lies in the new classification of the subject of famous scholars. From the angle of argumentation, the thesis divides the topic into six categories, so as to understand the thought source and material of the famous school, and to see the thread of thought and the field of thinking of the famous school. In addition, through these analyses, more people can understand the famous, eliminate the misunderstanding of the famous, and refute the criticism of the famous by other schools. The "strange talk" and "strange theory" of the famous scholars are not sophistry, but take this to open up a wider way of thinking for people, so that people begin to pay attention to life, reflect on common sense, and then improve their thinking methods.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：B81-09
本文編號：2268470
[Abstract]:This article is mainly to examine and explore the debate thought of the famous scholars in pre-Qin Dynasty. Famous scholars in the pre-Qin Dynasty included Deng analysis, Hui Shi, Gong Sun long and others, who put forward controversial debate and groundbreaking argumentation. However, due to the partial loss of materials such as Deng analysis and Hui Shi, scholars have different opinions on the debate thought of famous scholars. By analyzing the ideas of predecessors and the study of the original works, I put forward some personal views. This paper is divided into four parts. The first part is about the background and the characteristics of the debate. Due to political, economic, educational and other reasons, people began to broaden their thinking and think about life. The elaboration of the argumentative characteristics is beneficial to the understanding of the thinking mode, and the main contents of the famous scholars. The second part reclassifies these arguments on the basis of analyzing and summing up the ideas of famous scholars. The debate is divided into six categories, namely, the debate of relation, the debate of relative, the argument of name and name, the debate of subdued truth, the argument of separation from firmness and the debate of action. Through these classifications, we can understand the discussion content and the interest of famous scholars. These classifications also reflect the reflection and reflection of famous scholars on common sense and common sense. The third part is a more detailed elaboration and summary of the theoretical content, methods and requirements of the debate put forward by famous scholars. Through the analysis of some argumentative stories of famous scholars, we can summarize some methods and requirements of argumentation. Although famous scholars have not theorized these requirements and methods, they have influenced many schools of thought and made the theory of argumentation more abundant. The fourth part is to expound the profound significance of famous writers. The debate thought of famous scholars not only promoted the rise of debate, promoted the development of debate, broadened the field of debate, enriched the skills of debate, but also broadened people's thinking, advocated dialectical thinking, reverse thinking, etc. The most important thing is that the argumentative thoughts of famous scholars promote the development of logic and open a new chapter of logic in these seemingly sophistry debates. The innovation of this paper lies in the new classification of the subject of famous scholars. From the angle of argumentation, the thesis divides the topic into six categories, so as to understand the thought source and material of the famous school, and to see the thread of thought and the field of thinking of the famous school. In addition, through these analyses, more people can understand the famous, eliminate the misunderstanding of the famous, and refute the criticism of the famous by other schools. The "strange talk" and "strange theory" of the famous scholars are not sophistry, but take this to open up a wider way of thinking for people, so that people begin to pay attention to life, reflect on common sense, and then improve their thinking methods.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：B81-09
【引證文獻】
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 吳培培;西歐中世紀大學(xué)論辯教學(xué)研究[D];深圳大學(xué);2012年
，本文編號：2268470
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/ljx/2268470.html
最近更新
教材專著
