發(fā)布時間：2018-06-14 16:19

  本文選題：認知哲學(xué) + 認識論��； 參考：《哲學(xué)研究》2016年06期

【摘要】：分析知識的傳統(tǒng)方法是為真實的信念作辯護。根據(jù)這種方法,辯護是知識的必要條件,認識論者致力于研究知識的辯護或合理性由什么構(gòu)成的問題。內(nèi)在主義混淆了辯護的狀態(tài)與辯護活動之間的關(guān)系,致使對信念的辯護依賴于對它們的信任,客觀上制約著能辯護信念的范圍。克服這個難題只有走向知識的非辯護分析。走向外在主義是當(dāng)今認知哲學(xué)發(fā)展的重要趨勢,它表現(xiàn)在兩方面:一是把辯護還原為可靠性,二是采用一種"弱"規(guī)定的知識標準。
[Abstract]:The traditional way to analyze knowledge is to defend true beliefs. According to this method, defense is a necessary condition of knowledge, and epistemologists devote themselves to the question of what constitutes the justification or rationality of knowledge. Intrinsic doctrine confuses the relationship between the state of defense and the activity of defense, which leads to the reliance on the trust of belief, which objectively restricts the range of belief that can be defended. Overcoming this problem can only lead to non-defense analysis of knowledge. The trend towards externalism is an important trend in the development of cognitive philosophy, which is manifested in two aspects: one is to restore defense to reliability, and the other is to adopt a "weak" standard of knowledge.
【作者單位】： 中國計量大學(xué)馬克思主義學(xué)院;
【基金】：國家社科基金重點項目“基于邏輯視域的認知研究”(編號11AZD056) 教育部社科基金項目“認知科學(xué)視域的延展心靈問題研究”(編號15YJC720005)的階段性成果
【分類號】：B812
，

本文編號：2018117