純粹意向?qū)ο笈c指稱理論疑難的解決
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-09 08:45
本文選題：指稱 切入點(diǎn)：純粹意向?qū)ο?/strong> 出處：《湖南科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版)》2017年04期 論文類型：期刊論文
【摘要】：指稱可能失敗及替換失效問(wèn)題是量化信念語(yǔ)境以及其他態(tài)度語(yǔ)境所面臨的兩大障礙,"純粹意向?qū)ο?概念(只能通過(guò)它們的意向?qū)傩杂枰宰R(shí)別的對(duì)象)的提出或許有助于上述問(wèn)題的解決。就指稱可能失敗問(wèn)題而言,當(dāng)詞項(xiàng)所指對(duì)象不存在時(shí),將純粹意向?qū)ο笞鳛樵撛~項(xiàng)的指稱對(duì)象即可避免指稱失敗的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。就替換失效問(wèn)題而言,說(shuō)話者指稱而非語(yǔ)義性指稱對(duì)詞項(xiàng)的使用具有決定性意義,當(dāng)說(shuō)話者指稱為直接指稱時(shí),態(tài)度語(yǔ)境中指稱相同的詞項(xiàng)即可以替換。
[Abstract]:The problem of possible failure and replacement failure of reference is the two major obstacles to quantification of belief context and other attitude contexts, the introduction of the concept of "purely intentional object" (which can only be identified by their intentional attributes) or. May contribute to the resolution of the above problems... in the case of the alleged possible failure, When the object of a word item does not exist, the risk of reference failure can be avoided by using pure intention object as the reference object of the term item. In the case of replacement invalidation, the speaker reference, rather than the semantic reference, is of decisive significance in the use of the term item. When the speaker refers to the direct reference, the same term in the attitude context can be replaced.
【作者單位】： 奧斯陸大學(xué)哲學(xué)系;中國(guó)政法大學(xué)哲學(xué)系;
【分類號(hào)】：B815
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條
1 顏青山;;意向?qū)ο笈c摹狀詞[J];哲學(xué)研究;2006年06期
，本文編號(hào)：1587809
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/ljx/1587809.html
最近更新
教材專著
