本文選題：組合結(jié)構(gòu)　切入點：收斂結(jié)構(gòu)　出處：《哲學(xué)動態(tài)》2017年09期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：組合結(jié)構(gòu)與收斂結(jié)構(gòu)的區(qū)分是當(dāng)代論證分析理論和實踐研究的重點和難點。其中,組合與收斂結(jié)構(gòu)的支持方式問題、否定測試法的適用性問題以及組合-收斂論證與多重-并列復(fù)合論辯的關(guān)系問題可謂阻礙相關(guān)研究的三大疑難。通過梳理、分析學(xué)界在這三個問題認識方面存在的爭議不難看出,前提合起來支持結(jié)論并非組合結(jié)構(gòu)的獨有特征,在收斂論證中任一前提薄弱、假或不可信同樣會弱化全部前提作為一個整體對結(jié)論的支持;否定測試法遭遇的一系列質(zhì)疑,表明它沒有抓住組合與收斂結(jié)構(gòu)之分的關(guān)節(jié)點;組合-收斂論證與多重-并列復(fù)合論辯并不相互對應(yīng),其間的差異正如弗里曼所說源于不同的學(xué)科視角。
[Abstract]:The distinction between combinatorial structure and convergent structure is an important and difficult point in the theoretical and practical research of contemporary argumentation and analysis. The applicability of the negative test method and the relationship between combinatorial convergent argument and multi-parallel compound argument can be described as three major problems that hinder the related research. It is not difficult to see that the premise combined to support the conclusion is not the unique feature of the combinatorial structure, and that any premise is weak in the convergent argument. False or untrustworthy also weakens the support of all premises as a whole to the conclusion, negates a series of doubts encountered by the test method, which indicates that it does not grasp the key points of the combination and convergence structure. Combination-convergence argument and multi-parallel compound argument do not correspond to each other, and the differences between them, as Freeman said, originate from different subject perspectives.
【作者單位】： 中國政法大學(xué)哲學(xué)系;
【基金】：中國政法大學(xué)人文社會科學(xué)規(guī)劃項目“當(dāng)代西方論證結(jié)構(gòu)理論研究”(13ZFG72002) 教育部人文社會科學(xué)規(guī)劃基金項目“情境語義學(xué)視野下的態(tài)度句研究”(12YJA72040003)的階段性成果
【分類號】：B81
，

本文編號：1565288