天堂国产午夜亚洲专区-少妇人妻综合久久蜜臀-国产成人户外露出视频在线-国产91传媒一区二区三区

當(dāng)前位置:主頁(yè) > 社科論文 > 考古論文 >

文物保護(hù)新材料評(píng)價(jià)體系研究

發(fā)布時(shí)間:2019-06-05 04:14
【摘要】:隨著人們生活水平的日益提高,國(guó)家更加關(guān)注精神文明建設(shè),努力構(gòu)建我們中華民族共同的精神家園。在這種時(shí)代背景下,文化遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)領(lǐng)域越來越受到國(guó)家和人民的高度關(guān)注,國(guó)家也加大了政策傾斜力度和資金扶持力度。同時(shí),文化遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)領(lǐng)域也上下一心,積極進(jìn)取,始終堅(jiān)持和擴(kuò)大領(lǐng)域內(nèi)的改革與領(lǐng)域外的開放。近年來,文物保護(hù)領(lǐng)域一片欣欣向榮的景象,,文化遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)新材料大量涌現(xiàn)。然而,由于文物本身的脆弱性、稀缺性和不可再生性,在這些新材料使用于文物保護(hù)之前,必須經(jīng)過嚴(yán)格的評(píng)價(jià),以免造成不可挽回的損失。遺憾的是,我國(guó)針對(duì)文物保護(hù)新材料的評(píng)價(jià)還很不完善,尚無明確的評(píng)價(jià)準(zhǔn)則、嚴(yán)格的評(píng)價(jià)流程、科學(xué)的評(píng)價(jià)方法以及健全的評(píng)價(jià)組織。 基于這一背景,本文在技術(shù)評(píng)價(jià)相關(guān)理論的指導(dǎo)下,在科技評(píng)價(jià)相關(guān)法律法規(guī)的約束下,通過借鑒相近行業(yè)已有的評(píng)價(jià)體系,構(gòu)建了文物保護(hù)新材料評(píng)價(jià)體系。鑒于文物保護(hù)新材料評(píng)價(jià)存在的問題,本評(píng)價(jià)體系包括4大部分:確定新材料評(píng)價(jià)準(zhǔn)則,規(guī)范新材料評(píng)價(jià)流程,提出新材料評(píng)價(jià)方法,構(gòu)建新材料評(píng)價(jià)組織。 首先,本文通過對(duì)文物保護(hù)思想史和實(shí)踐史的梳理,提出了文物保護(hù)新材料評(píng)價(jià)的四大準(zhǔn)則:安全性,有效性,科學(xué)性和可再處理性。其次,在研究總結(jié)一般的科技成果評(píng)價(jià)方法和使用條件的基礎(chǔ)上,本文提出了文物保護(hù)新材料評(píng)價(jià)應(yīng)該堅(jiān)持“以定量評(píng)價(jià)為主、定性評(píng)價(jià)和定量評(píng)價(jià)相結(jié)合”的評(píng)價(jià)方法。最后,通過深入考察研究醫(yī)藥評(píng)價(jià)的相關(guān)組織和流程,結(jié)合本領(lǐng)域的特點(diǎn),本文提出了新材料評(píng)價(jià)流程;根據(jù)評(píng)價(jià)流程的設(shè)計(jì),又構(gòu)建了評(píng)價(jià)組織架構(gòu)。
[Abstract]:With the improvement of people's living standards, the state pays more attention to the construction of spiritual civilization and strives to build our common spiritual home of the Chinese nation. Under the background of this era, the field of cultural heritage protection has been paid more and more attention by the state and the people, and the state has also increased its policy tilt and financial support. At the same time, the field of cultural heritage protection is also United and enterprising, always adhere to and expand the reform in the field and the opening up outside the field. In recent years, the field of cultural relics protection is booming, and a large number of new materials for cultural heritage protection have emerged. However, due to the vulnerability, scarcity and non-reproducibility of cultural relics themselves, these new materials must be strictly evaluated before they are used in cultural relics protection in order to avoid irreparable losses. Unfortunately, the evaluation of new materials for cultural relics protection in our country is still very imperfect, there is no clear evaluation criteria, strict evaluation process, scientific evaluation methods and sound evaluation organization. Based on this background, under the guidance of the relevant theories of technical evaluation, under the constraints of the relevant laws and regulations of scientific and technological evaluation, this paper constructs the evaluation system of cultural relics protection new materials by using the existing evaluation system of similar industries for reference. In view of the problems existing in the evaluation of new materials for cultural relics protection, this evaluation system includes four parts: determining the evaluation criteria of new materials, standardizing the evaluation process of new materials, putting forward the evaluation methods of new materials, and constructing the evaluation organization of new materials. First of all, by combing the history of cultural relics protection thought and practice, this paper puts forward four criteria for the evaluation of new materials for cultural relics protection: safety, effectiveness, science and reprocessing. Secondly, on the basis of studying and summarizing the general evaluation methods and application conditions of scientific and technological achievements, this paper puts forward that the evaluation of new materials for cultural relics protection should adhere to the evaluation method of "combining quantitative evaluation with quantitative evaluation". Finally, by deeply investigating and studying the related organizations and processes of medical evaluation, combined with the characteristics of this field, this paper puts forward a new material evaluation process, and constructs the evaluation organizational structure according to the design of the evaluation process.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:北京化工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2012
【分類號(hào)】:K87

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉作義,陳曉田;科學(xué)研究評(píng)價(jià)的性質(zhì)、作用、方法及程序[J];科研管理;2002年02期

2 柏杰,蘇竣,張雅嫻;研究與開發(fā)評(píng)估方法述評(píng)[J];科研管理;2000年05期

3 黃建國(guó);呂酈慷;;日本科技評(píng)估制度的特征及其對(duì)中國(guó)的啟示[J];中國(guó)科技論壇;2007年04期

4 趙紅專;翟立新;李強(qiáng);;公共科研機(jī)構(gòu)績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)的指標(biāo)與方法[J];科學(xué)學(xué)研究;2006年01期

5 楊長(zhǎng)桂;技術(shù)評(píng)估簡(jiǎn)論[J];華中理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1994年01期

6 楊壬飛,仝允桓;技術(shù)評(píng)估中的實(shí)物期權(quán)方法文獻(xiàn)綜述[J];研究與發(fā)展管理;2005年01期

7 張國(guó)良;陳宏民;;國(guó)家高技術(shù)研發(fā)計(jì)劃評(píng)估體系研究[J];科學(xué)學(xué)研究;2006年01期

8 張平;日本科技評(píng)估及其對(duì)我國(guó)的借鑒[J];中國(guó)科技論壇;2005年02期

9 王憑慧;科學(xué)研究項(xiàng)目評(píng)估方法綜述[J];科研管理;1999年03期

10 張珩,楊藝虹,楊建設(shè),陳中;中美兩國(guó)新藥審批辦法比較[J];武漢化工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2000年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 方冉;19世紀(jì)風(fēng)格性修復(fù)理論以及對(duì)當(dāng)代中國(guó)歷史建筑保護(hù)的再認(rèn)識(shí)[D];同濟(jì)大學(xué);2007年



本文編號(hào):2493248

資料下載
論文發(fā)表

本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/kgx/2493248.html


Copyright(c)文論論文網(wǎng)All Rights Reserved | 網(wǎng)站地圖 |

版權(quán)申明:資料由用戶eb035***提供,本站僅收錄摘要或目錄,作者需要?jiǎng)h除請(qǐng)E-mail郵箱bigeng88@qq.com