【摘要】：本文以洛陽地區(qū)東周時期的墓葬作為研究對象。依據(jù)隨葬品的種類對墓葬進行分類;以器物類型學(xué)研究為基礎(chǔ),劃分出具有不同文化面貌和發(fā)展體系的群別,并分別對各群墓葬進行分期和年代研究;運用文化因素分析方法確定各群墓葬所具有的主要及外來文化因素。最后通過以上研究探求墓葬所反映的社會各等級的變化情況以及洛陽地區(qū)與外部文化之間的交流影響情況。 論文的內(nèi)容分為八個部分 第一部分:前言 對本文研究的時空框架進行了界定,總結(jié)了以往研究的成果和存在的不足。 第二部分:墓葬的形制、葬具與葬式 對墓葬的形制進行類型學(xué)研究,并概況了這一時期墓葬的葬具、葬式和隨葬品的位置等情況。 第三部分:典型器物的類型學(xué)研究 對墓葬中隨葬的銅禮器和陶器分別進行型式劃分,明確了各類器物的發(fā)展演變規(guī)律。 第四部分:墓葬的分類與分群研究 依據(jù)隨葬品的種類將墓葬分為銅禮器墓、仿銅陶禮器墓及日用陶器墓三類,并介紹了各類墓葬的主要特征與區(qū)別;在以往研究基礎(chǔ)上,通過器物的類型學(xué)分析,將墓葬劃分為甲、乙兩群,并介紹了兩群墓葬的主要特征與區(qū)別。 第五部分:墓葬的分期與年代研究 對甲、乙兩群墓葬分別進行分期研究。在甲群墓葬中依據(jù)器物類型學(xué)分別對三類墓葬進行分組研究,通過共出器物建立了三類墓葬之間的橫向聯(lián)系,最后參考墓葬形制、葬式以及其他隨葬器物將甲群墓分為六期十段,乙群墓則依據(jù)器物和墓葬形制等特征分為兩期四段,并分別對兩群墓葬的年代進行了討論。 第六部分:文化因素分析 分析了甲、乙兩群墓葬所發(fā)現(xiàn)的外來文化因素,并將具有外來文化因素的器物分為純外來文化型、融合型及仿造型三類。并分析了甲、乙兩群墓葬之間的相互影響情況。 第七部分:墓葬所反映的歷史發(fā)展情況 根據(jù)不同時期各類墓葬的變化討論了社會各等級的消長和變遷情況;通過對具有外來文化因素的器物及其所在單位進行分析,討論了洛陽與其他地區(qū)文化間的交流情況,并分析了外來文化對甲、乙兩群墓葬影響程度的不同及產(chǎn)生這種現(xiàn)象的原因。 第八部分:結(jié)語 總結(jié)了論文的主要研究和觀點,提出存在的不足。
[Abstract]:This paper takes the tombs in the Eastern Zhou Dynasty in Luoyang as the research object. According to the types of funeral objects, the tombs are classified according to the types of funerals, and the groups with different cultural features and development systems are divided according to the study of utensil typology, and the stages and ages of each group of tombs are studied respectively. The main and foreign cultural factors of each group of tombs were determined by means of cultural factor analysis. Finally, through the above research, this paper explores the changes of various levels of society reflected by tombs and the influence of communication between Luoyang area and external culture. The content of this paper is divided into eight parts: the preface defines the temporal and spatial framework of this paper, and summarizes the results and shortcomings of the previous research. The second part: the shape of the tomb, the funeral utensils and the graveyard type to carry on the typological study to the graveyard shape, and has summarized the graveyard funeral utensils, the funerary type and the position of the funerary object and so on in this period. The third part: the typological study of typical utensils divides the bronze ritual ware and pottery buried in the tomb respectively, and clarifies the development and evolution law of all kinds of utensils. The fourth part: according to the classification and grouping of tombs, the tombs are divided into three categories: bronze ritual tombs, imitating copper pottery tombs and daily pottery tombs, and the main characteristics and differences of all kinds of tombs are introduced. On the basis of previous studies, through the typological analysis of utensils, the tombs are divided into two groups: group A and group B, and the main characteristics and differences of the two groups of tombs are introduced. The fifth part: the stage and chronology of the tomb, the two groups of tombs are studied by stages. According to the classification of utensils, the three kinds of tombs are divided into groups according to the type of utensils in Group A tombs, and the horizontal relations among the three types of tombs are established by co-producing utensils. Finally, the shape of tombs is referred to. The graveyard of Group A is divided into six stages and ten sections according to the characteristics of utensils and tomb shape, and the ages of the two groups of tombs are discussed respectively. the graveyard of Group B is divided into two stages and four stages according to the characteristics of utensils and tomb shape, and the ages of the two groups of tombs are discussed respectively. The sixth part analyzes and analyzes the foreign cultural factors found in the tombs of A and B, and divides the utensils with foreign cultural factors into three categories: pure foreign culture, fusion and imitation. The interaction between group A and group B tombs is analyzed. The seventh part: according to the changes of all kinds of tombs in different periods, the historical development reflected by tombs discusses the growth, decline and change of various levels of society. Based on the analysis of artifacts with foreign cultural factors and their units, this paper discusses the cultural exchanges between Luoyang and other regions, and analyzes the foreign culture against A. The influence degree of the two groups of tombs is different and the causes of this phenomenon. The eighth part: the conclusion summarizes the main research and the viewpoint of the paper, and puts forward the shortcomings.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：K878.8

【引證文獻】

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 胡保華;中國北方出土先秦時期銅矛研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號：2486832