【摘要】：龍山時(shí)代后期，地處漢水中、上游及其以南地區(qū)的石家河文化，在繼承之前的屈家?guī)X文化后進(jìn)一步發(fā)展。以往對(duì)該文化墓地的研究表明，其社會(huì)內(nèi)部的階級(jí)分化已較為明顯，尤以漢東地區(qū)為甚，而湘江和漢水上游地區(qū)則緊隨其后。這種階級(jí)上的分化不僅將石家河文化帶入了文明的門檻，或許也加速了石家河文化的覆滅。 本文對(duì)石家河文化墓地的出土材料進(jìn)行了梳理。首先，筆者在重新討論石家河文化的分期的基礎(chǔ)上，對(duì)石家河文化的墓葬進(jìn)行了分期研究，確定了石家河文化墓葬的相對(duì)年代。其次，分析了典型墓地，討論了墓葬間的階級(jí)分化和貧富差距，同時(shí)又對(duì)各墓地進(jìn)行了比較，并探討了淵源、流向，與周邊考古學(xué)文化遺存互動(dòng)交流。最后，筆者劃分了石家河文化墓地的等級(jí)，借此討論石家河文化的社會(huì)性質(zhì)及其歷史進(jìn)程，認(rèn)為內(nèi)外雙重因素導(dǎo)致了石家河文化的突然消失。 筆者將文章分為了四個(gè)部分進(jìn)行論述： 緒論 簡(jiǎn)要概述了石家河文化的時(shí)空范圍、學(xué)術(shù)史、學(xué)術(shù)觀點(diǎn)以及目前仍需解決的問題。 第一章石家河文化墓葬的分期及年代 筆者對(duì)石家河文化肖家屋脊、鄧家灣、青龍泉、七里河以及岱子坪遺址的居址進(jìn)行分段，建立了石家河文化墓地的編年框架，明確了墓地在石家河文化中的相對(duì)年代。 第二章石家河文化典型墓地分析 筆者對(duì)肖家屋脊、鄧家灣、青龍泉、七里河以及岱子坪遺址的石家河文化墓地進(jìn)行分析，表明各墓葬在隨葬品數(shù)量、墓壙面積、墓地布局等方面都顯示出了階級(jí)的高低和貧富上的巨大落差。 第三章石家河文化墓地表述的歷史進(jìn)程 筆者討論了石家河文化墓葬作為一種文化因素的淵源和流向，認(rèn)為肖家屋脊和鄧家灣，以及青龍泉墓地在墓葬形制和葬俗上繼承了屈家?guī)X文化的喪葬形式，而七里河遺址和岱子坪遺址的墓葬在形制和葬俗上則受到了大汶口文化和湘江流域地區(qū)考古學(xué)文化墓葬傳統(tǒng)的影響。關(guān)于石家河文化墓葬的流向，就目前的材料表明僅有七里河遺址三房灣文化在葬俗上繼承了青龍泉遺址的腰坑葬，而肖家屋脊遺址后石家河文化則僅保留了甕棺葬，無土坑墓。最后，結(jié)合之前對(duì)墓地的分析，筆者在石家河文化的時(shí)空框架內(nèi)將石家河文化典型墓地的墓葬分為了6個(gè)級(jí)別，4個(gè)層次。同時(shí)，指出石家河文化在所面臨的時(shí)代大環(huán)境下已步入文明，，并認(rèn)為由于其內(nèi)部階級(jí)的高度分化和來自北部王灣三期遺存的向南擠壓，最終導(dǎo)致石家河文化消亡。 第四章結(jié)論 對(duì)之前石家河文化墓地的研究進(jìn)行總結(jié)，并做出最后結(jié)論性的概括。
[Abstract]:In the late Longshan period, Shijiahe culture in the upper reaches and south of Han River developed further after inheriting the qu Jialing culture. Previous studies on the cultural graveyard show that the class differentiation within the society is more obvious, especially in the Handong region, while the upper reaches of Xiangjiang River and Hanshui River are closely followed. This class differentiation not only brought Shijiazhe culture to the threshold of civilization, but also accelerated the destruction of Shijiazhe culture. This paper combs the unearthed materials of Shijiahe Cultural Cemetery. First of all, on the basis of re-discussing the stages of Shijiazhe culture, the author studies the burial stages of Shijiahe culture and determines the relative age of Shijiahe cultural tombs. Secondly, the typical cemeteries are analyzed, and the class differentiation and the gap between rich and poor are discussed. At the same time, the cemeteries are compared, and the origin, direction and interaction with the surrounding archaeological and cultural relics are discussed. Finally, the author classifies the graveyard of Shijiahe culture and discusses the social nature and historical process of Shijiahe culture. The author thinks that internal and external double factors lead to the sudden disappearance of Shijiazhe culture. The paper is divided into four parts: the introduction briefly summarizes the space-time scope of Shijiahe culture, academic history, academic point of view and the problems that still need to be solved. The first chapter is the division and age of Shijiahe Cultural Tomb. The author divides the sites of Shijiahe Cultural Shaojia Ridge, Dunjiawan, Qinglongquan, Qilihe and Daiziping sites, and establishes the chronological framework of Shijiahe Cultural Cemetery. The relative age of cemeteries in Shijiahe culture is clear. Chapter II Analysis of Shijiahe Cultural typical Cemetery the author analyzes the Shijiahe Cultural Cemetery of the Xiaojia Ridge, Deng Jiawan, Qinglongquan, Qilihe and Daiziping sites, indicating that the tombs are in the number of objects and the area of the tombs. The layout of the graveyard shows the high and low of the class and the great disparity between the rich and the poor. Chapter III the historical process of the expression of Shijiahe Cultural Cemetery the author discusses the origin and direction of Shijiahe Cultural Tomb as a cultural factor, and thinks that the Xiaojia roof ridge and Dengjiawan are the two major cultural factors of Shijiahe Cultural Cemetery. And the Qinglongquan cemetery inherited the funeral forms of qu Jialing culture in the form of burial and funeral customs. On the other hand, the graves of Qilihe and Daiziping sites were influenced by the culture of Dawenkou and the culture of archaeology in Xiangjiang River basin. On the direction of Shijiahe Cultural Tomb, the present materials show that only Qilihe River site Sanfangwan culture inherited the waist pit burial of Qinglongquan site on the burial custom, while the Shijiazhe culture only retained the urn coffin burial after the Xiaojia roof ridge site, and there was no earth pit tomb. Finally, combining with the analysis of the graveyard before, the author divides the tombs of the typical graves of Shijiazhe culture into six levels and four levels within the framework of time and space of Shijiahe culture. At the same time, the paper points out that Shijiahe culture has stepped into civilization under the environment of the times, and thinks that Shijiahe culture will die out because of the high differentiation of its inner class and the southward squeeze from the third phase of Wangwan in the north. The fourth chapter summarizes the study of Shijiahe Cultural Cemetery and makes a final conclusion.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：K878.8

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王銀平;;湖北天門鄧家灣石家河文化墓葬相關(guān)問題探討[J];長(zhǎng)江文明;2009年01期

2 席道合;試論獨(dú)嶺坳與磨山遺址的分期、年代及文化屬性[J];湖南考古輯刊;1999年00期

3 楊權(quán)喜;當(dāng)陽季家湖考古試掘的主要收獲[J];江漢考古;1980年02期

4 李龍章;淺議石家河文化[J];江漢考古;1985年03期

5 王紅星 ,胡雅麗;江漢地區(qū)“龍山時(shí)代”遺存的命名問題——“石河文化”的特征、年代與分布[J];江漢考古;1985年03期

6 白云;;關(guān)于“石家河文化”的幾個(gè)問題[J];江漢考古;1993年04期

7 ;荊門團(tuán)林叉堰沖遺址發(fā)掘簡(jiǎn)報(bào)[J];江漢考古;2001年03期

8 ;1958年洛陽東干溝遺址發(fā)掘簡(jiǎn)報(bào)[J];考古;1959年10期

9 ;湖北松滋縣桂花樹新石器時(shí)代遺址[J];考古;1976年03期

10 ;孟津小潘溝遺址試掘簡(jiǎn)報(bào)[J];考古;1978年04期

本文編號(hào)：2471817