豫東地區(qū)夏商時代文化研究
發(fā)布時間：2019-01-12 13:48
【摘要】： 豫東地區(qū)考古學(xué)文化自發(fā)現(xiàn)以來一直備受學(xué)界的關(guān)注,而這一地區(qū)夏商時期的考古學(xué)文化更是關(guān)注的焦點(diǎn)。此前,學(xué)界已涌現(xiàn)出許多有關(guān)豫東地區(qū)考古學(xué)文化的研究成果,尤其是近年新的發(fā)現(xiàn)和研究成果,為深入、全面研究豫東地區(qū)考古學(xué)文化奠定了基礎(chǔ)。 本文在前人研究的基礎(chǔ)上,運(yùn)用文化因素分析法、類型學(xué)、地層學(xué)及“多重證據(jù)法”等考古學(xué)方法,充分吸收新的考古發(fā)現(xiàn)和研究成果,對豫東地區(qū)考古學(xué)文化進(jìn)行綜合分析研究。全文共分為五部分,包括緒論、遺址介紹、考古學(xué)文化遺存分析、各文化之間的關(guān)系、反映的歷史問題。 文章認(rèn)為,在夏商時代,豫東地區(qū)曾分布著二里頭文化、岳石文化、下七垣文化、二里崗文化、殷墟文化等五種考古學(xué)文化。這五種考古學(xué)文化均與各自中心地區(qū)的考古學(xué)文化相似,但又有其自身的特點(diǎn)。其中二里頭文化可以分為四期,岳石文化可以分為三期,兩者的起始年代大體相當(dāng),并形成一種東、西對峙關(guān)系,但兩者之間也有一些文化交流。到了二里頭文化晚期,下七垣文化發(fā)展到這一地區(qū),與岳石文化并存,并與二里頭文化形成對峙關(guān)系,并有所交流。下七垣文化可分兩期,約相當(dāng)于二里頭文化的三、四期。進(jìn)入二里崗文化階段以后,下七垣文化和二里頭文化均消失,而岳石文化仍然分布于該地區(qū)。到二里崗文化四期之時,二里崗文化東擴(kuò),但只占據(jù)了豫東地區(qū)西部,岳石文化仍在此延續(xù),兩者之間也是一種對峙和交流關(guān)系。進(jìn)入殷墟文化二期之時,殷墟文化已占據(jù)了豫東地區(qū)的全部范圍,岳石文化在該地區(qū)基本消失。 豫東地區(qū)考古學(xué)文化的面貌和相互關(guān)系,反映一定的史實(shí)。夏王朝早期勢力較弱,且與東夷族關(guān)系修好,中期之時夏王朝開始向四周擴(kuò)展,其中東擴(kuò)至豫東地區(qū)西部地區(qū)。夏王朝晚期,商族開始南下,并與東夷族形成聯(lián)盟關(guān)系,共同抵抗夏王朝。商王朝建立以后,因與東夷族有聯(lián)盟關(guān)系一直沒有東擴(kuò),至中丁之時,開始東擴(kuò),但沒有完全控制豫東地區(qū),直到武丁之后才完成東擴(kuò)。
[Abstract]:Since the discovery of archaeological culture in the eastern part of Henan Province, the archaeological culture in this area has been paid more attention to by scholars, and the archaeological culture in this area during the Xia and Shang dynasties is the focus of attention. Before that, many research results about archaeological culture in eastern Henan have emerged, especially the new discoveries and research results in recent years, which have laid the foundation for a thorough and comprehensive study of archaeological culture in eastern Henan. On the basis of previous studies, this paper uses cultural factor analysis, typology, stratigraphy and "multiple evidence method" to fully absorb new archaeological discoveries and research results. This paper makes a comprehensive analysis and research on the archaeological culture in the eastern part of Henan Province. The full text is divided into five parts, including introduction, site introduction, archaeological cultural remains analysis, the relationship between different cultures, reflecting the historical problems. This paper holds that in the Xia and Shang dynasties, there were five archaeological cultures in the eastern part of Henan Province, such as Erlitou culture, Yue Shi culture, Xia-Qiyuan culture, Erligang culture and Yin ruins culture. These five archaeological cultures are similar to the archaeological cultures in their respective central regions, but have their own characteristics. Erlitou culture can be divided into four periods and Yueshi culture can be divided into three periods. The beginning of the two cultures is roughly the same and forms a relationship between east and west, but there are also some cultural exchanges between the two. In the late period of Erlitou culture, the culture of the lower seven walls developed to this area, and co-existed with the culture of Yue Shi, and formed a confrontation relationship with the culture of Erlitou, and some exchanges were made. The next seven-yuan culture can be divided into two stages, about the equivalent of Erlitou culture three, four. After entering the stage of Erligang culture, the lower Qiyuan culture and Erlitou culture disappeared, while the Yueshi culture was still distributed in the area. By the time of the fourth period of Erligang culture, Erligang culture expanded eastward, but only occupied the western part of Henan Province. The Yueshi culture continued here, and the relationship between them was also a kind of confrontation and exchange. When entering the second phase of Yin ruins culture, Yin ruins culture occupied the whole area of eastern Henan, and Yue Shi culture basically disappeared in this area. The appearance and relationship of archaeological culture in eastern Henan reflect certain historical facts. In the early period of the Xia Dynasty, the power was weak and the relations with the Dongyi ethnic group were amicable. In the middle of the period, the Xia Dynasty began to expand to the surrounding areas, including the eastern part of Henan Province and the western part of the region. In the late Xia Dynasty, the Shang nationality began to go south and formed an alliance with the Dongyi people to resist the Xia Dynasty. After the establishment of the Shang Dynasty, there was no eastward expansion because of the alliance with the Dongyi ethnic group, but it began to expand eastward until the time of the middle Ding, but it did not complete the eastward expansion until after Wuding.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：K871
[Abstract]:Since the discovery of archaeological culture in the eastern part of Henan Province, the archaeological culture in this area has been paid more attention to by scholars, and the archaeological culture in this area during the Xia and Shang dynasties is the focus of attention. Before that, many research results about archaeological culture in eastern Henan have emerged, especially the new discoveries and research results in recent years, which have laid the foundation for a thorough and comprehensive study of archaeological culture in eastern Henan. On the basis of previous studies, this paper uses cultural factor analysis, typology, stratigraphy and "multiple evidence method" to fully absorb new archaeological discoveries and research results. This paper makes a comprehensive analysis and research on the archaeological culture in the eastern part of Henan Province. The full text is divided into five parts, including introduction, site introduction, archaeological cultural remains analysis, the relationship between different cultures, reflecting the historical problems. This paper holds that in the Xia and Shang dynasties, there were five archaeological cultures in the eastern part of Henan Province, such as Erlitou culture, Yue Shi culture, Xia-Qiyuan culture, Erligang culture and Yin ruins culture. These five archaeological cultures are similar to the archaeological cultures in their respective central regions, but have their own characteristics. Erlitou culture can be divided into four periods and Yueshi culture can be divided into three periods. The beginning of the two cultures is roughly the same and forms a relationship between east and west, but there are also some cultural exchanges between the two. In the late period of Erlitou culture, the culture of the lower seven walls developed to this area, and co-existed with the culture of Yue Shi, and formed a confrontation relationship with the culture of Erlitou, and some exchanges were made. The next seven-yuan culture can be divided into two stages, about the equivalent of Erlitou culture three, four. After entering the stage of Erligang culture, the lower Qiyuan culture and Erlitou culture disappeared, while the Yueshi culture was still distributed in the area. By the time of the fourth period of Erligang culture, Erligang culture expanded eastward, but only occupied the western part of Henan Province. The Yueshi culture continued here, and the relationship between them was also a kind of confrontation and exchange. When entering the second phase of Yin ruins culture, Yin ruins culture occupied the whole area of eastern Henan, and Yue Shi culture basically disappeared in this area. The appearance and relationship of archaeological culture in eastern Henan reflect certain historical facts. In the early period of the Xia Dynasty, the power was weak and the relations with the Dongyi ethnic group were amicable. In the middle of the period, the Xia Dynasty began to expand to the surrounding areas, including the eastern part of Henan Province and the western part of the region. In the late Xia Dynasty, the Shang nationality began to go south and formed an alliance with the Dongyi people to resist the Xia Dynasty. After the establishment of the Shang Dynasty, there was no eastward expansion because of the alliance with the Dongyi ethnic group, but it began to expand eastward until the time of the middle Ding, but it did not complete the eastward expansion until after Wuding.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：K871
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 鄒衡;奻娭殷墟文化分期[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文科學(xué));1964年04期
2 高建國;黃河流域幾十座城池消失之謎[J];城市與減災(zāi);2002年03期
3 袁廣闊;從古文獻(xiàn)與考古資料看夏文化的起始年代[J];河南大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2000年01期
4 宋豫秦;;論魯西南地區(qū)的商文化[J];華夏考古;1988年01期
5 張文軍;張志清;樊溫泉;王勝利;;河南鹿邑欒臺遺址發(fā)掘簡報[J];華夏考古;1989年01期
6 ;河南杞縣朱崗遺址試掘報告[J];華夏考古;1992年01期
7 靳松安 ,朱光華 ,張家強(qiáng);豫東商丘地區(qū)考古調(diào)查簡報[J];華夏考古;2005年02期
8 ;河南杞縣牛角崗遺址試掘報告[J];華夏考古;1994年02期
9 欒豐實(shí);試論岳石文化與鄭州地區(qū)早期商文化的關(guān)系──兼論商族起源問題[J];華夏考古;1994年04期
10 ;1958年洛陽東干溝遺址發(fā)掘簡報[J];考古;1959年10期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 段天t，
本文編號：2407850
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/kgx/2407850.html
最近更新
教材專著
