【摘要】：我國經(jīng)濟的迅猛發(fā)展，使城市化進(jìn)程不斷加快，也使很多城市的面貌發(fā)生了翻天覆地的變化。然而由于城市空間的有限性以及土地資源的短缺，在城市化進(jìn)程中大量具有歷史文化價值的古建筑受到破壞。建筑類文化遺產(chǎn)的保護(hù)面臨著前所未有的挑戰(zhàn)。建筑類文化遺產(chǎn)是不可再生的珍貴資源，它們都有著深厚的文化積淀，具有重要的歷史價值和文化價值，是城市文化傳承的載體，也是這個城市歷史的凝結(jié)與縮影。 遼寧省沈陽市在城市化進(jìn)程中也面臨上述問題。許多珍貴的歷史建筑尤其清代的歷史建筑在城市化的浪潮中逐漸消失，這對打造沈陽市獨特的清代文化名片造成了非常嚴(yán)重的影響，也阻礙了文化傳承的步伐。因此，全面認(rèn)識沈陽市清代建筑類文化遺產(chǎn)的現(xiàn)狀、價值和意義，，并對這些珍貴的文化遺產(chǎn)采取切實有效的保護(hù)政策非常必要。 本文嘗試從公共政策的角度出發(fā)，立足沈陽市現(xiàn)實，根據(jù)歷史建筑保護(hù)現(xiàn)狀以及國外歷史建筑的保護(hù)經(jīng)驗，對沈陽市歷史建筑保護(hù)提出可行性的政策建議。本文采用文獻(xiàn)研究法、比較分析法和社會調(diào)查法對此問題進(jìn)行研究。研究結(jié)果表明,沈陽市歷史建筑未能得到有效保護(hù)的原因很多。例如，建筑類文化遺產(chǎn)法律保護(hù)制度還不完善；政策方案本身內(nèi)容陳舊或欠缺；政策執(zhí)行機構(gòu)之間溝通不暢；政策執(zhí)行人員素質(zhì)不高等。此外，在政策執(zhí)行過程中缺乏必要的人力、物力、財力等政策資源的支持。通過探討這些因素對于沈陽市文化遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)政策的影響，本文提出通過完善相關(guān)法律法規(guī)、細(xì)化政策內(nèi)容、提高政策執(zhí)行人員素質(zhì)、加強部門之間的溝通協(xié)調(diào)以及加強政策資源的支持等幾個方面對沈陽市清代建筑類文化遺產(chǎn)進(jìn)行保護(hù)。只有這樣才能使沈陽市優(yōu)秀的文化遺產(chǎn)得到真正意義上的保護(hù)，從而加快沈陽歷史文化名城的建設(shè)步伐。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of economy in China, the process of urbanization has been accelerated, and the appearance of many cities has undergone earth-shaking changes. However, due to the limitation of urban space and the shortage of land resources, a large number of ancient buildings with historical and cultural value have been destroyed in the process of urbanization. The protection of architectural cultural heritage is facing unprecedented challenges. Architectural cultural heritage is a precious non-renewable resource, which has profound cultural accumulation, important historical value and cultural value, is the carrier of urban cultural heritage, and is also the condensation and epitome of the city's history. Shenyang, Liaoning Province also faces the above problems in the process of urbanization. Many precious historical buildings, especially in Qing Dynasty, gradually disappeared in the tide of urbanization, which caused a very serious impact on the unique Qing Dynasty culture card of Shenyang, and also hindered the pace of cultural inheritance. Therefore, it is necessary to fully understand the present situation, value and significance of architectural cultural heritage of Qing Dynasty in Shenyang, and to take effective protection policies for these precious cultural heritage. From the angle of public policy, based on the reality of Shenyang, according to the current situation of historical buildings protection and the protection experience of foreign historical buildings, this paper puts forward feasible policy recommendations for the protection of historical buildings in Shenyang. This paper uses literature research, comparative analysis and social investigation to study this problem. The research results show that there are many reasons for the failure of Shenyang historical buildings to be effectively protected. For example, the legal protection system of architectural cultural heritage is not perfect; the policy program itself is obsolete or lacking; the communication between policy implementing agencies is not smooth; the quality of policy enforcement personnel is not high. In addition, lack of necessary human, material, financial and other policy resources in the process of policy implementation. By discussing the influence of these factors on the policy of cultural heritage protection in Shenyang, this paper proposes to improve the quality of the policy executors by perfecting the relevant laws and regulations, refining the policy contents, and improving the quality of the policy executors. Strengthen the communication and coordination between departments and strengthen the support of policy resources to protect the architectural cultural heritage of Qing Dynasty in Shenyang. Only in this way can the excellent cultural heritage of Shenyang be protected in real sense and the construction of Shenyang historical and cultural city be accelerated.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：沈陽師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：K879.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 喬占軍;公共政策執(zhí)行障礙及其對策[J];重慶工學(xué)院學(xué)報;2005年09期

2 葉秋華;孔德超;;文化遺產(chǎn)法律保護(hù)中的幾個問題[J];法學(xué)家;2008年05期

3 谷俊青;;國外歷史風(fēng)貌建筑的保護(hù)及啟示[J];中國房地產(chǎn);2010年09期

4 鄧堪強;;城市更新中歷史建筑保護(hù)的問題與對策[J];中國房地產(chǎn);2011年11期

5 Fergus T. Maclaren;加拿大遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)的實踐以及有關(guān)機構(gòu)[J];國外城市規(guī)劃;2001年04期

6 雷麗芬;劉德志;王子夫;;當(dāng)下我國城市建筑遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)面臨的危機與思考[J];華中建筑;2012年03期

7 王星光;賈兵強;;國外歷史文化遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)機制及其對我國的啟示[J];廣西民族研究;2008年01期

8 薛志宏;;淺談如何發(fā)揮新媒體在企業(yè)文化建設(shè)中的作用[J];科學(xué)之友;2012年12期

9 張璐晶;;文物保護(hù)“法人犯法”:定性難,治理更難[J];中國經(jīng)濟周刊;2010年42期

10 李磊;;歷史街區(qū)保護(hù)中的法律尷尬[J];小城鎮(zhèn)建設(shè);2004年07期

本文編號：2350141