【摘要】：甘肅臨潭縣磨溝遺址是近年來在洮河上游地區(qū)發(fā)現(xiàn)的一處重要的史前遺址,也是在甘青地區(qū)發(fā)現(xiàn)的唯一一處以豎穴偏室墓為主要形制的齊家文化墓地。墓地中發(fā)現(xiàn)了一批黑、灰色雙耳罐為代表的陶器,部分與齊家文化陶器共存,其質(zhì)地、顏色、器型都與齊家文化陶器有著明顯區(qū)別,而與寺洼文化陶器相似,這一現(xiàn)象在初次發(fā)掘的時(shí)候就引起了注意,但沒有專文進(jìn)行研究。本文把這批陶器命名為“磨溝式陶器”,旨在將其與齊家文化陶器及稍后的寺洼文化陶器相區(qū)分。通過對磨溝式陶器構(gòu)成及演變的考察,以及磨溝式陶器與齊家式、寺洼式陶器之間關(guān)系的對比分析,認(rèn)為磨溝式陶器并非是由典型齊家式陶器演變而來,而是在磨溝墓地齊家文化晚期產(chǎn)生的一種新的器類,發(fā)展壯大而取代了齊家式陶器,進(jìn)而演變?yōu)樗峦菔教掌�。含有這三種不同陶器的墓葬分析表明,隨葬陶器不同但埋葬習(xí)俗基本沒有改變,也就是使用同一種葬俗的人群是延續(xù)發(fā)展的。本文認(rèn)為齊家文化向寺洼文化的轉(zhuǎn)變形式是陶器面貌上的整體替代,而人群并未變遷,寺洼人才是真正的齊家人的延續(xù)；陶器組群的變化不能代表考古學(xué)文化就一定發(fā)生了改變,也不能說明人群在變遷,考古學(xué)文化也不能與人群相等同。
[Abstract]:Mogou site in Lintan County Gansu Province is an important prehistoric site found in the upper reaches of Tao River in recent years. In the graveyard, a batch of pottery represented by black and grey two-ear pots were found. Some of them coexisted with Qijia cultural pottery. The texture, color and type of pottery were obviously different from those of Qijia culture, but they were similar to those of Siwa culture. This phenomenon attracted attention at the time of initial excavation, but there was no dedicated research. In this paper, we name these pottery as "moat pottery" in order to distinguish it from Qijia culture pottery and later Siwa cultural pottery. Based on the investigation of the composition and evolution of the grooved pottery, and the comparative analysis of the relationship between the grinding groove type pottery and Qijia type, Siwa type pottery, it is concluded that the grinding groove type pottery did not evolve from the typical Qijia type pottery. But in the late period of Qijia culture in Mogou cemetery, a new kind of pottery was created, which developed and expanded and replaced Qijia pottery, and then evolved into Siwa type pottery. The analysis of the tombs containing these three kinds of pottery shows that the interment pottery is different but the burial custom has not changed basically, that is to say, the people who use the same burial custom continue to develop. This paper holds that the transformation form from Qi culture to Siwa culture is the overall substitution of pottery, but the crowd has not changed, and the talent of Siwa is the continuation of the true Qi family. The change of pottery group can not represent the change of archaeological culture, nor does it mean that the crowd is changing, and the archaeological culture can not be equal to the crowd.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：K876.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

中國期刊全文數(shù)據(jù)庫 前10條

1 安志敏;;甘肅遠(yuǎn)古文化及其有關(guān)的幾個(gè)UO楲[J];考古通訊;1956年06期

2 夏鼐;;關(guān)于考古學(xué)上文化的定名問題[J];考古;1959年04期

3 吳汝祚;;甘青地區(qū)原始文化的概貌及其相互關(guān)系[J];考古;1961年01期

4 ;青海樂都柳灣原始社會墓地反映出的主要問題[J];考古;1976年06期

5 ;寶雞竹園溝等地西周墓[J];考古;1978年05期

6 謝端琚;;論大何莊與秦魏家齊家文化的分期[J];考古;1980年03期

7 胡謙盈;;甘肅莊浪縣徐家碾寺洼文化墓葬發(fā)掘紀(jì)要[J];考古;1982年06期

8 ;甘肅卓尼(艸也)兒遺址試掘簡報(bào)[J];考古;1994年01期

9 樊維華;;(艸也)兒遺址文化性質(zhì)初探[J];考古;1994年01期

10 ;甘肅古文化遺存[J];考古學(xué)報(bào);1960年02期

中國碩士學(xué)位論文全文數(shù)據(jù)庫 前2條

1 宋江寧;試論寺洼文化[D];中國社會科學(xué)院研究生院;2001年

2 周靜;磨溝齊家文化墓地分期分區(qū)及相關(guān)問題研究[D];西北大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號：2345197