泥河灣舊石器文化與北京猿人文化關(guān)系的探討
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-11-09 13:55
【摘要】：周口店第一地點(diǎn)(北京猿人遺址)和泥河灣盆地是我國(guó)舊石器時(shí)代考古研究中的代表性地區(qū)。北京猿人遺址是我國(guó)最早發(fā)現(xiàn)的直立人遺址,遺址中北京猿人頭蓋骨的發(fā)現(xiàn)確認(rèn)了直立人作為人類發(fā)展歷程中重要一環(huán)的事實(shí)。多年來(lái),有關(guān)北京猿人遺址的相關(guān)研究成果斐然,研究?jī)?nèi)容涉及學(xué)科之廣泛,課題之深入在我國(guó)舊石器時(shí)代遺址中當(dāng)屬首位。賈蘭坡先生亦將北京猿人遺址作為華北地區(qū)舊石器兩大文化傳統(tǒng)學(xué)說(shuō)中的重要內(nèi)容�？梢�,其文化面貌在整個(gè)華北地區(qū)具有獨(dú)特性和代表性。而同處這一地區(qū)的泥河灣盆地,舊石器考古研究雖起步較晚,但盆地中舊石器遺址數(shù)量眾多,文化序列自舊石器早期一直延續(xù)至晚期。其在古人類學(xué)以及舊石器考古學(xué)上所具有的價(jià)值和意義,可與非洲奧杜威峽谷相媲美。泥河灣舊石器文化在北京猿人出現(xiàn)之前就已經(jīng)延續(xù)了很長(zhǎng)時(shí)間,在北京猿人出現(xiàn)后又與其同處華北地區(qū)這一地域框架之中,二者之間相互關(guān)系的探討具有重要意義,曾經(jīng)就有學(xué)者提出"泥河灣盆地始終被納入追索北京猿人來(lái)龍去脈的視野中"的說(shuō)法。而及至今日,國(guó)內(nèi)考古學(xué)者對(duì)這兩者文化內(nèi)涵之間的相互關(guān)系著墨甚少。本文希望通過(guò)對(duì)泥河灣盆地內(nèi)典型遺址以及北京猿人遺址中石制品的研究,對(duì)兩者之間的關(guān)系做一系統(tǒng)的闡釋。本文以遺址中已發(fā)表的石制品為研究對(duì)象,從石制品的原料、打片技術(shù)、修理技術(shù)以及工具組合等方面出發(fā),探討北京猿人文化同泥河灣舊石器文化之間的關(guān)系。文章主要由五部分組成:第一部分總體描述了泥河灣盆地以及北京猿人遺址中的舊石器考古發(fā)現(xiàn)和研宄狀況。第二章和第三章分別對(duì)泥河灣盆地中典型遺址和北京猿人遺址中的石制品進(jìn)行梳理、分類。第四章依據(jù)第二章和第三章中石制品的分類和統(tǒng)計(jì)數(shù)據(jù),從石制品的原料和技不因素出發(fā)對(duì)兩文化之間關(guān)系進(jìn)行比較。第五章為結(jié)論和討論部分,該部分在總結(jié)前一章中分析結(jié)果的基礎(chǔ)上對(duì)兩文化間的相互關(guān)系做一系統(tǒng)闡釋。
[Abstract]:The first site of Zhoukoudian (site of Peking Man) and Nihewan Basin are the representative areas of paleolithic archaeological research in China. Peking ape-man site is the earliest Homo erectus site found in China. The discovery of the skull of Peking ape-man confirms the fact that Homo erectus is an important link in the course of human development. For many years, the related research results of Peking ape-man site have been remarkable, and the research content involves a wide range of disciplines, and the research topic is the first among the Paleolithic sites in China. Jia Lanpo also regarded the Peking Man site as an important part of the two cultural traditions of Paleolithic in North China. Visible, its cultural face is unique and representative throughout North China. Although the paleolithic archaeological research in Nihewan basin in the same area started late, there are many Paleolithic sites in the basin, and the cultural sequence has continued from the early Paleolithic period to the late period. Its value and significance in paleoanthropology and paleolithic archaeology are comparable to those in the Aldovian Valley of Africa. The paleolithic culture of Nihewan has lasted for a long time before the emergence of the Peking ape-man, and in the regional framework of the same region as the Peking ape-man, it is of great significance to explore the relationship between the two. Some scholars have proposed that the Nihewan Basin has always been included in the vision of the tracing of Peking Man. To this day, domestic archaeologists on the two cultural connotations of the relationship is very little. This paper hopes to make a systematic explanation of the relationship between the typical sites in the Nihewan Basin and the stone products in the ruins of Peking ape-man. In this paper, the relation between Peking ape-man culture and Nihewan Paleolithic culture is discussed from the aspects of raw material, chip technology, repair technology and tool combination. The paper consists of five parts: the first part describes the archaeological discovery and research status of Paleolithic tools in Nihewan basin and Peking ape-man site. In the second and third chapters, the typical sites in Nihewan Basin and the ruins of Peking ape-man are sorted out and classified. According to the classification and statistical data of stone products in the second and third chapters, the fourth chapter compares the relationship between the two cultures according to the raw materials and technical factors of stone products. The fifth chapter is the conclusion and discussion part, which systematically explains the relationship between the two cultures on the basis of summarizing the analysis results in the previous chapter.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山西大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號(hào)】：K878
本文編號(hào)：2320606
[Abstract]:The first site of Zhoukoudian (site of Peking Man) and Nihewan Basin are the representative areas of paleolithic archaeological research in China. Peking ape-man site is the earliest Homo erectus site found in China. The discovery of the skull of Peking ape-man confirms the fact that Homo erectus is an important link in the course of human development. For many years, the related research results of Peking ape-man site have been remarkable, and the research content involves a wide range of disciplines, and the research topic is the first among the Paleolithic sites in China. Jia Lanpo also regarded the Peking Man site as an important part of the two cultural traditions of Paleolithic in North China. Visible, its cultural face is unique and representative throughout North China. Although the paleolithic archaeological research in Nihewan basin in the same area started late, there are many Paleolithic sites in the basin, and the cultural sequence has continued from the early Paleolithic period to the late period. Its value and significance in paleoanthropology and paleolithic archaeology are comparable to those in the Aldovian Valley of Africa. The paleolithic culture of Nihewan has lasted for a long time before the emergence of the Peking ape-man, and in the regional framework of the same region as the Peking ape-man, it is of great significance to explore the relationship between the two. Some scholars have proposed that the Nihewan Basin has always been included in the vision of the tracing of Peking Man. To this day, domestic archaeologists on the two cultural connotations of the relationship is very little. This paper hopes to make a systematic explanation of the relationship between the typical sites in the Nihewan Basin and the stone products in the ruins of Peking ape-man. In this paper, the relation between Peking ape-man culture and Nihewan Paleolithic culture is discussed from the aspects of raw material, chip technology, repair technology and tool combination. The paper consists of five parts: the first part describes the archaeological discovery and research status of Paleolithic tools in Nihewan basin and Peking ape-man site. In the second and third chapters, the typical sites in Nihewan Basin and the ruins of Peking ape-man are sorted out and classified. According to the classification and statistical data of stone products in the second and third chapters, the fourth chapter compares the relationship between the two cultures according to the raw materials and technical factors of stone products. The fifth chapter is the conclusion and discussion part, which systematically explains the relationship between the two cultures on the basis of summarizing the analysis results in the previous chapter.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山西大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號(hào)】：K878
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 雷蕾;泥河灣舊石器文化與北京猿人文化關(guān)系的探討[D];山西大學(xué);2016年
，本文編號(hào)：2320606
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/kgx/2320606.html
最近更新
教材專著
