【摘要】： 本文根據(jù)鄭州大師姑城址2002-2003年的考古發(fā)掘資料,在發(fā)掘者確定鄭州大師姑城址是一座二里頭文化晚期城址的基礎(chǔ)上,著重分析了鄭州大師姑城址中二里崗文化早期壕溝與二里頭文化晚期城墻有機(jī)結(jié)合的關(guān)系,提出了鄭州大師姑城址還是一座二里崗文化早期城址的新論點(diǎn)。根據(jù)大師姑二里崗文化早期城址取代大師姑二里頭文化晚期城址的考古實(shí)際及對二里崗早期文化流與源的追溯‘,論證了大師姑二里崗文化早期城址為先商或早商文化城址,結(jié)合文獻(xiàn)與相關(guān)學(xué)者.的研究成果,提出了鄭州大師姑二里崗文化早期城址是商湯滅夏前所建韋亳的新觀點(diǎn),從地域和文化面貌上樹立起了晚夏文化與先商或早商文化分界的有效界標(biāo)。據(jù)此,分別探討了夏商分界于偃師二里頭文化二、三期之間、商湯滅夏前后曾分別居有南亳與北亳以及二里頭遺址三期西亳說、偃師商城太甲桐宮說及鄭州商城枮都說等學(xué)術(shù)觀點(diǎn)的合理性,從而有可能為山窮水復(fù)中的夏商分界與湯亳問題研究送上一枝綠柳。 全文共分七部分：1.引言,敘述了夏商分界和湯亳問題研究的歷程與現(xiàn)存的癥結(jié),探討了目前打開癥結(jié)的有效方法。2.概述了鄭州大師姑二里頭文化晚期城址形狀、年代和性質(zhì)。3.根據(jù)大師姑二里崗文化城壕與二里頭文化城墻有機(jī)結(jié)合的考古資料,著重探討了鄭州大師姑城址還是一座二里崗文化早期城址。4.通過大師姑二里崗文化早期城址取代大師姑二里頭文化晚期城址的年代、方式、性質(zhì)的探討,結(jié)合二里崗早期文化流與源的追溯,提出了大師姑二里崗文化早期城址商湯滅夏前韋亳說的新觀點(diǎn)。5.分析了二里頭三期宮殿、鄭州商城和偃師商城界標(biāo)說的局限性,探討了大師姑二里崗下層一期城址夏商分界界標(biāo)的有效性及對夏商分界問題研究的重要意義。6.探討了大師姑二里崗下層一期城址夏商分界界標(biāo)對商湯滅夏前曾居豫東商丘一帶南亳和北亳、滅夏后又以二里頭三期新建宮城為西亳、偃師商城為桐宮及鄭州商城為枮都等學(xué)說合理性的重要意義。7.結(jié)語,重點(diǎn)指出了現(xiàn)有考古資料的局限性及今后研究中應(yīng)注意的問題。
[Abstract]:Based on the archaeological excavations of the site of Zhengzhou Master Gu in 2002-2003, and on the basis of the determination by the excavator that the site of the Great Master of Zhengzhou is a site of late Erlitou culture, This paper analyses the relationship between the early trench of Erligang culture and the wall of late Erlitou culture in the site of Zhengzhou Master Gu, and puts forward a new argument that whether the site of Master Gu of Zhengzhou is an early site of Erligang culture. According to the archaeological practice of the early city site of guru Guerligang culture replacing the late stage of master Gulitou culture, and the tracing of the early cultural flow and source of Erligang culture, it is demonstrated that the early city site of Master Guerligang culture is the site of the pre-Shang or early Shang culture city. Combined with literature and related scholars. In this paper, the author points out that the early site of Guerligang culture of Zhengzhou Master is a new viewpoint that Wei Bo was built before Shang Tang destroyed summer, and set up an effective boundary between late summer culture and pre-Shang or early Shang culture from the aspect of region and culture. Based on this, the paper discusses the division of Xia and Shang between the second and third phases of Erlitou Culture in Yanshi, and the theory that before and after Shang Tang died, there lived in the south Bo and the north Bo and the third stage West Bo of Erlitou site, respectively. The rationality of academic viewpoints such as Taijia Tong Palace of Yanshi Shangcheng and Yu du of Zhengzhou Mall may send a green willow to the study of the distinction between Xia and Shang and Tang Bo in the recovery of mountains and rivers. The full text is divided into seven parts: 1. In the foreword, the paper describes the course and the extant crux of the research on the differentiation between Xia and Shang dynasties and the Tang Bo problem, and probes into the effective method of opening up the crux at present. 2. This paper summarizes the shape, age and nature of the late city site of Guerlitou Culture, a great master of Zhengzhou. Based on the archaeological data of the organic combination of Guerligang Culture City trench and the wall of Erlitou Culture, the author emphatically discusses whether the site of Master Gugu of Zhengzhou is an early site of Erligang culture. Through the discussion of the age, mode and nature of the early city site of the great guru Erligang culture replacing the late stage of the master Erlitou culture, combined with the tracing of the early cultural flow and the origin of Erligang, This paper puts forward a new viewpoint. 5. This paper analyzes the limitations of the boundary markers theory of Erlitou 3 Palaces, Zhengzhou Shang City and Yanshi Shang City, and probes into the validity of the Xia and Shang boundary markers at the lower stage of Master Guerligang and their significance to the study of the Xia and Shang boundaries. This paper discusses the boundary markers of the Xia and Shang divisions of the lower stage of Master Gu Erligang, which once lived in the southern and northern Bo area of Shangqiu area in eastern Henan before the end of the summer, and then took the new Miyagi city in Erlitou III as the west Bo after summer. Yanshi Shangcheng is the Tonggong and Zhengzhou Shangcheng is the capital. 7. In conclusion, the limitations of the existing archaeological data and the problems to be paid attention to in the future research are emphatically pointed out.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：K878

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 鄒衡;偃師商城即太甲桐宮說[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);1984年04期

2 安金槐;;關(guān)于鄭州商代二里崗期陶器分期問題的再探討[J];華夏考古;1988年04期

3 安金槐;;對于鄭州商代南關(guān)外期遺存的再認(rèn)識[J];華夏考古;1989年01期

4 蔡全法,馬俊才;河南新密市古城寨龍山文化城址發(fā)掘簡報(bào)[J];華夏考古;2002年02期

5 楊育彬;再論鄭州商城的年代、性質(zhì)及相關(guān)問題[J];華夏考古;2004年03期

6 靳松安 ,朱光華 ,張家強(qiáng);豫東商丘地區(qū)考古調(diào)查簡報(bào)[J];華夏考古;2005年02期

7 欒豐實(shí);試論岳石文化與鄭州地區(qū)早期商文化的關(guān)系──兼論商族起源問題[J];華夏考古;1994年04期

8 徐旭生;;1959年夏豫西調(diào)查“夏墟”的初步報(bào)告[J];考古;1959年11期

9 ;1959年河南偃師二里頭試掘簡報(bào)[J];考古;1961年02期

10 方酉生;;河南偃師二里頭遺址發(fā)掘簡報(bào)[J];考古;1965年05期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前2條

1 劉緒;[N];中國文物報(bào);2001年

2 河南省文物考古研究所 袁廣闊;[N];中國文物報(bào);2005年

，

本文編號：2232277