【摘要】：上海博物館藏戰(zhàn)國楚竹書《武王踐阼》主要記述師尚父向武王授丹書,武王刻銘自警之事,內(nèi)容與《大戴禮記·武王踐阼》大致相合,是目前所見《武王踐阼》最早的傳本。本文主要分上下兩編。上編主要對學(xué)界有關(guān)上博簡《武王踐阼》字詞訓(xùn)釋成果進(jìn)行較為全面的梳理與總結(jié)。下編分四章,重點(diǎn)研究文本性質(zhì)、編纂整理、傳世本注解以及刻銘內(nèi)容。《武王踐阼》并非出自儒家,而是具有濃厚黃老道家色彩的文獻(xiàn)。傳世本《武王踐阼》的“經(jīng)典化”是在簡本基礎(chǔ)上有目的、有步驟編輯的結(jié)果�！段渫踣`阼》所見器物刻銘并非原創(chuàng),而是在整合當(dāng)時的公共話語資源。簡本《武王踐阼》也為《金人銘》作期的重新考量提供了新的線索。簡本《武王踐阼》不僅為傳世本《武王踐阼》的�？碧峁┬沦Y料,改定傳世本在流傳過程中產(chǎn)生諸多訛誤,而且還藉此平議諸家注釋注疏得失。
[Abstract]:The collection of Chu bamboo book "Wu Wang Jian Huo" in the Shanghai Museum is mainly related to the fact that Wu Wang's inscription was given to Wu Wang by his father, and the inscription of Wu Wang's inscription was self-warning. The content is roughly consistent with "Wu Jian Huo", and it is the earliest biography of "Wu Wang Jian efficiency" seen at present. This paper is divided into two parts. The first part is a comprehensive review and summary of the academic achievements of the word "Wu Wang Jian depress" in the academic field. The next part is divided into four chapters, focusing on the nature of the text, compilation and collation, the annotation of the handed down text and the content of the inscription. [Wu Wang Jian Di] is not from the Confucian school, but a document with strong Huang Lao Taoist color. The classicalization of Wu Wang Jian deater is the result of systematic editing on the basis of the simplified version. The inscription of the objects seen in Wu Wang Jian depress is not original, but is integrating the resources of public discourse at that time. The brief book Wu Wang Jian depress also provides a new clue for the reconsideration of Jin Ren Ming. The simplified version of Wu Wang Jian depress not only provides new data for the collation of the handed down edition of Wu Wang Jian depress, but also makes a number of errors in the course of circulation, and also discusses the gains and losses of the notes of the various families.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：煙臺大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：K877.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李松儒;;上博七《武王踐阼》的抄寫特征及文本構(gòu)成[J];江漢考古;2015年02期

2 許兆昌;李大鳴;;試論《武王踐祚》的文本流變[J];古代文明;2015年02期

3 楊宋鋒;;上博簡《武王踐阼》研究述略[J];六盤水師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年06期

4 徐海東;李明曉;;《上博七·武王踐阼》與《大戴禮記》[J];古籍整理研究學(xué)刊;2012年06期

5 楊宋鋒;;楚簡《武王踐阼》R劶荹J];綏化學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年02期

6 楊宋鋒;梁虹;;楚簡《上博七·武王踐阼》缺文脫文考察[J];牡丹江大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2011年11期

7 劉洪濤;;《武王踐阼》校讀舉例[J];中國典籍與文化;2011年01期

8 楊宋鋒;;楚簡《上博七·武王踐祚》殘字考釋[J];南陽師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年07期

9 劉秋瑞;;再論《武王踐阼》是兩個版本[J];古籍研究;2009年Z1期

10 楊華;;上博簡《武王踐阼》集釋(下)[J];井岡山大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2010年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 甘良勇;《大戴禮記》研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2012年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 楊宋鋒;楚簡《上博七·武王踐阼》字詞研究[D];安徽大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號：2185533