本文選題：歐陽修 + 尹洙墓志��； 參考：《文史哲》2017年01期

【摘要】：墓銘文字既要面對"朋友門生故吏與孝子用心常異"的情感寄托,更需堅守"所紀(jì)事皆錄實有稽據(jù)"的信史原則,其撰述過程往往牽涉到經(jīng)學(xué)、史學(xué)與"古文"創(chuàng)作關(guān)聯(lián)互動的深層邏輯。歐陽修所撰《尹師魯墓志銘》所引發(fā)的爭議,既隱約反映出歐、尹等人"以同而異"的史學(xué)取向,更集中體現(xiàn)著歐陽修"意主文章"而"于情事或不能詳備"的著史風(fēng)格�！赌怪俱憽肺脑诜Q述尹洙"倡道"功績方面頗有"所惜",蓋與尹、歐之間的學(xué)術(shù)分歧密切相關(guān)。尹氏著意效法《春秋》之"微言大義",并倡言國家應(yīng)"以明經(jīng)為上第",其經(jīng)學(xué)理念與歐陽修、孫復(fù)、石介等人"棄傳從經(jīng)"、"以己意言經(jīng)"者背道而馳。至于師魯文章"簡而有法"的評述,既是歐陽修"每夸政事,不夸文章"的慣常做法,更隱約透露出此公不肯就"古文"一事少讓于尹洙的微妙心態(tài),其深刻復(fù)雜的人格動因及精神內(nèi)涵值得深究。
[Abstract]:The inscription of tomb inscriptions should not only face the emotional sustenance of "friends, students, deceased officials and filial sons with different intentions", but also adhere to the principle of "all chronicles are recorded and documented." the process of compiling the inscriptions often involves the study of the classics. The deep logic of the interaction between historiography and the creation of ancient prose. The controversy caused by Ouyang Xiu's "Yin Shilu epitaph" is a vague reflection of the historical orientation of Europe, Yin and others, which are "identical but different". The epitaph reflects the historical style of Ouyang Xiu's "meaning main article" but "in the event or can't be prepared in detail". The epitaph has a "treasure" in describing Yin Su's achievements in "advocating the Tao", which is closely related to the academic differences between Yin and Europe. Yin emulated the "great meaning" of the Spring and Autumn period, and advocated that the state should "take the Ming Classic as the first place", and its philosophy of Confucian classics ran counter to those of Ouyang Xiu, Sun Fu, Shi Jiaoke and others who "forsaken and passed on the scriptures" and "said the scriptures with their own will". As for the commentary of Shi Lu's article "simple but with the method", it is not only the usual practice of Ouyang Xiu "to praise every political matter but not the article", but also a vague disclosure of the subtle mentality of Yu Yin-su 's refusal to let Yu Yin-soo be less willing to give up the "ancient prose" issue. Its profound and complicated personality motivation and spiritual connotation are worth studying deeply.
【作者單位】： 杭州師范大學(xué)人文學(xué)院;
【基金】：教育部人文社會科學(xué)項目“宋代士人學(xué)術(shù)研究與詩文創(chuàng)作的關(guān)聯(lián)與互動”(13YGA751064)的階段性成果
【分類號】：K877.45

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 劉越峰;;論歐陽修散文刻意求簡之病[J];天水師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年04期

2 禾成;;歐陽修求教 作品不厭改 字字凝心血[J];新聞戰(zhàn)線;1980年05期

3 陳千里;;粵教版《唐宋散文選讀》若干問題小札[J];廣東教育(綜合版);2011年03期

4 高成芳;;歐陽修求教刪文[J];秘書之友;1986年05期

5 陳學(xué)勇;顧農(nóng);;說真話的麻煩[J];讀書文摘;2008年08期

6 李奇;;“怕后生笑”的歐陽修[J];文史春秋;2006年05期

7 洪本健;略論“六一風(fēng)神”[J];文學(xué)遺產(chǎn);1996年01期

8 劉溶;歐陽修、王安石、曾鞏的文章理論[J];北京師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);1990年05期

9 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 里波;歐陽修寫墓志銘[N];學(xué)習(xí)時報;2012年

，

本文編號：2058586