本文選題：安史之亂 + 僭號(hào)�。� 參考：《揚(yáng)州大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：歷時(shí)八年之久、影響大半個(gè)中國的安史之亂是唐朝由盛而衰的轉(zhuǎn)折點(diǎn)。安史之亂的始末情狀在傳世典籍的記載中已堪稱周詳。十九世紀(jì)末以來,隨著唐代石刻文獻(xiàn)尤其是唐人墓志的大宗出土,關(guān)于這場動(dòng)亂更為詳細(xì)的史實(shí)信息得以為世人所了解。相較于流傳過程中多經(jīng)后世選擇、整理、增刪、潤色以致頗有失真的唐代傳世文獻(xiàn),長存地下、新近出土的唐人墓志更為純粹地保留了歷史的原初面貌。新出墓志中的人、事記載清晰地展現(xiàn)了戰(zhàn)亂環(huán)境下各類人群的生存心境與生活狀態(tài),頗有于傳世史籍正誤、補(bǔ)闕者,成為了唐史研究彌足珍貴的第一手材料。 同時(shí),大多數(shù)墓志本身就是一篇文學(xué)作品,且唐人于撰寫墓志一事多極為用心,其撰志制石之風(fēng)又并未因戰(zhàn)亂發(fā)生而疏忽廢止。故而,對(duì)亂中不同身份、立場的墓志撰人及特殊環(huán)境下墓志文表情達(dá)意方式的認(rèn)知與考察,亦是唐代文學(xué)研究領(lǐng)域頗具價(jià)值的新課題。 在安史之亂相關(guān)墓志中,題有亂間叛軍所建立的“僭偽”年號(hào)的墓志又是特殊的-類。清末民初,葉昌熾《語石》一書既列“唐僭號(hào)一則”專述其罕見價(jià)值,柯昌泗先生《語石異同評(píng)》復(fù)據(jù)所見增補(bǔ)葉氏之論,其后百年間又有數(shù)十方此類墓志陸續(xù)出土。 本文即對(duì)現(xiàn)今可見的49方行用安史僭號(hào)墓志作出綜合性探討,全文分為四個(gè)部分： 第一部分,“安史僭號(hào)及其墓志行用”考察了《資治通鑒》、《舊唐書》與《新唐書》這幾種傳世史籍以及新出土墓志,對(duì)于安史之亂這一重大歷史事件的記錄,并通過比讀辨析了傳世文獻(xiàn)中對(duì)于安慶緒僭號(hào)“載初”記載的正誤。 第二部分,“行用安史僭號(hào)墓志的類型”則對(duì)行用安史僭號(hào)這類墓志進(jìn)一步細(xì)分,將其劃分為合襯墓志、歸葬墓志與權(quán)厝墓志三個(gè)類別,并在此基礎(chǔ)上考察了社會(huì)動(dòng)蕩背景下民間飾終之典的特征。 第三部分,“行用安史僭號(hào)墓志的表情達(dá)意”探究了這類特定歷史時(shí)期內(nèi)寫就的墓志文字背后所蘊(yùn)藏的隱晦事實(shí)與復(fù)雜情感。對(duì)于不同身份、立場的撰文者特別是陷身偽朝的貳臣,彼時(shí)的創(chuàng)作心態(tài)進(jìn)行了揣度與分析。 第四部分,“行用安史僭號(hào)墓志所見著名文士陷賊行實(shí)與心態(tài)”則通過新出佚作的釋錄,對(duì)名垂史冊(cè)的著名文士李史魚、李華、趙驊等陷賊行實(shí)及仕偽心態(tài)作出鉤沉考辨。
[Abstract]:Over the past eight years, the disturbance of the history of an history of more than half of China is a turning point in the Tang Dynasty. The beginning and end of the rebellion of an history of the Tang Dynasty is very detailed in the records of the ancient books of the world. Since the end of the nineteenth Century, the more detailed information of the historical facts about the chaos of the Tang Dynasty, especially the unearthed of the Tang Dynasty's epitaph, is considered to be more detailed. Compared with the choice, arrangement, addition, deletions, and embellishment of the literature of the Tang Dynasty, the unearthed epitaph of the Tang Dynasty has retained the original appearance of the history, and the records of the new epitaph clearly show the state of life and life of all kinds of people under the war. The living condition, which is quite correct in passing the historical records, has become a precious first-hand material in the study of Tang history.
At the same time, most of the epitaph itself is a literary work, and the people of the Tang Dynasty wrote the epitaph very much, and the style of writing his ambition was not neglected because of the war. Therefore, the cognition and investigation of the different identities, the epitaph of the position, the epitaph and the expression of the epitaph expression in the special environment are also the literary studies of the Tang Dynasty. A new field of value in the field.
In the epitaph related to the chaos of the history of an history, the epitaph of the "unauthorized" year number established by the rebellion is also special - class. In the late Qing Dynasty and the early Republic of China, Ye Changchi's stone stone, a book not only listed the rare value of the "Tang Dynasty one", but also added to the theory of "Yip", which has been added to the evidence of "the similarities and differences of language and stone", and there are ten kinds of such epitaph in the next hundred years. Unearthed in succession.
This article is a comprehensive discussion of the 49 party lines that are now visible, using the epitaph of an Shi Shi. The full text is divided into four parts:
The first part, "the usages of the history of peace and its epitaph", inspected the records of the historical records of the unearthed history and the new unearthed epitaph, the records of the historical records of the rebellion of the history of the ancient Tang Dynasty, the old Tang book and the new Tang book, and the error of the "beginning of the book" in the literature of An Qingxu.
In the second part, "the type of the epitaph of the anti sign of an Shi Shi" is further subdivided into the epitaph, which is divided into three categories of epitaph, burial epitaph and the epitaph of the right house, and on this basis, the characteristics of the final code of folk decoration under the background of social unrest are investigated.
The third part, "the expression of the expression of the epitaph of an espg" explores the obscure facts and complex emotions hidden behind the epitaph written in the specific historical period. The writers of the different status, the position of the writers, especially the false faces of the false Dynasty, have carried out the analysis and speculation.
In the fourth part, "the famous scholars of the literati and the state of mind" in "the epitaph of the rogue of Anshi", through the interpretation of the new anecdotes, made an examination of the truthfully, Li Shiyu, Li Hua and Zhao Hua, the famous scholars of the history books.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：揚(yáng)州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：I206.2;K877.45

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 戴偉華;;出土墓志與唐代文學(xué)研究[J];傳統(tǒng)文化與現(xiàn)代化;1998年04期

2 陳尚君;;石刻文獻(xiàn)述要[J];古典文學(xué)知識(shí);1996年02期

3 田立坤;;唐楊濤墓志考[J];文物;1993年10期

4 閻萬章;;《唐楊濤墓志考》中志主死因推測辨誤[J];文物;1995年04期

5 陳鐵民;;李華事跡考[J];文獻(xiàn);1990年04期

6 福原U_郎 ,王大建;西晉墓志的意義[J];文史哲;1993年03期

7 侯璐;幾方特殊的唐代墓志[J];文物春秋;2003年04期

8 陳尚君;文史考據(jù)應(yīng)有所闕疑[J];文學(xué)遺產(chǎn);1994年04期

9 胡可先;出土文獻(xiàn)與唐代文學(xué)史新視野[J];文學(xué)遺產(chǎn);2005年01期

10 陳曙雯;;李華與佛教關(guān)系考論[J];西南民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社科版);2007年12期

，

本文編號(hào)：2032895