發(fā)布時間：2018-06-05 19:30

  本文選題：夏商時期 + 陶大口尊　； 參考：《陜西師范大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文以出土的夏商時期陶大口尊資料為主,運用類型學(xué)、統(tǒng)計學(xué)、文化因素分析法等考古學(xué)方法,討論了夏商時期陶大口尊的命名、型式、期段和年代、區(qū)域分布、功用等,最后就相關(guān)問題進行說明。全文共分六個部分： 緒論：介紹了學(xué)術(shù)界對陶器命名的原則以及陶大口尊的命名,對本文所考察的陶大口尊進行了界定和說明,簡要介紹了本文的選題意義、研究方法及技術(shù)路線。 第一章：類型學(xué)分析。運用考古地層學(xué)、類型學(xué)原理,將大口尊分為3型12亞型及若干式。在此基礎(chǔ)上,將夏商時期大口尊分為六期八段。一期為1、2段,相當(dāng)于二里頭文化二、三期。二期為3段,相當(dāng)于二里頭文化四期。三期為4、5段,相當(dāng)于二里崗下層。四期為6段,相當(dāng)于二里崗上層一期。五期為7段,相當(dāng)于二里崗上層二期。六期為8段,相當(dāng)于殷墟早期�？傮w來看,夏商時期大口尊一脈相承,沒有明顯缺環(huán),經(jīng)歷了產(chǎn)生、發(fā)展、鼎盛、衰落和消亡等幾個階段。 第二章：大口尊的分布。夏商時期大口尊范圍大致北到晉南,西達關(guān)中東部,南至長江流域,東到山東西部,與夏商王朝的統(tǒng)治區(qū)域密切相關(guān)。本文將大口尊的地域分布大致劃分為8個類型,分別為二里頭類型、楊莊類型、東下馮—臺西類型、鹿臺崗類型、二里崗類型、大城墩類型、白家莊類型和殷墟類型,呈現(xiàn)“一源多體”的分布格局。大致而言,大口尊的分布,體現(xiàn)著中原夏商文化向周圍地區(qū)的拓展。 第三章：大口尊的功用。根據(jù)大口尊出現(xiàn)的時代背景、器形特征、出土數(shù)量、分布范圍以及在古文字和歷史文獻中的體現(xiàn),推測大口尊為夏商時期釀酒或儲酒的專用陶器之一,與夏商時期釀酒業(yè)的發(fā)展及民眾的飲酒習(xí)風(fēng)有密切關(guān)系。 第四章：相關(guān)問題探討。大口尊這一稱謂存在同名現(xiàn)象。在史前及西周時期,均有同名大口尊陶器,但與本文大口尊并沒有必然聯(lián)系,屬于不同時代的不同器類。同時在大口尊研究上,還存在諸如大口尊起源、刻劃符號、陶質(zhì)特性、制作工藝等需進一步解決的問題。 結(jié)語：對全文探討的問題作了總結(jié),并概括出四點認(rèn)識。
[Abstract]:Based on the unearthed data of Tao Dakouzun in Xia and Shang dynasties, this paper discusses the naming, type, period and age, regional distribution, function and so on, using archaeological methods such as typology, statistics, cultural factor analysis, etc. Finally, the related issues are explained. The full text is divided into six parts: Introduction: this paper introduces the principles of naming pottery and the naming of Tao Daguzun in academic circles, defines and explains the Tao Daguzun inspected in this paper, and briefly introduces the significance, research methods and technical route of this paper. Chapter one: typology analysis. Based on the principles of archaeological stratigraphy and typology, Dakuzun is divided into 3 types and 12 subtypes and several types. On this basis, the Xia and Shang dynasties were divided into six periods and eight sections. The first stage is 1 and 2, which is equivalent to the second and third phases of Erlitou Culture. The second phase is three paragraphs, equivalent to the fourth stage of Erlitou culture. The third period is 4, 5, which is equivalent to the lower layer of Erli Gang. Four periods for 6, equivalent to the upper stage of Erligang. The fifth period is 7, which is equivalent to the second stage of the upper layer of Erligang. The sixth period is 8 paragraphs, equivalent to the early Yin ruins. In general, in the Xia and Shang dynasties, there was no obvious absence of ring, and it experienced several stages, such as generation, development, peak, decline and extinction. Chapter two: the distribution of Daguzun. During the Xia and Shang dynasties, the area of Daguzun was roughly north to the south of Shanxi, west to the east of Guanzhong, south to the Yangtze River basin and east to the western part of Shandong, which was closely related to the ruling region of the Xia and Shang dynasties. In this paper, the regional distribution of Dakuzun is roughly divided into eight types: Erlitou type, Yangzhuang type, Dongxia Fengtai type, Lutai gang type, Erligang type, Dachengdun type, Baijiazhuang type and Yin ruins type. The distribution pattern of "one source and many bodies" is presented. Generally speaking, the distribution of Daguzun reflects the expansion of the Xia and Shang culture in the Central Plains to the surrounding areas. Chapter three: the function of Daguzun. Based on the background of Dakuzun's emergence, the shape of the vessel, the number of excavations, the distribution range and the manifestation in ancient Chinese characters and historical documents, it is inferred that Dakou is one of the special pottery wares for wine making or wine storage in the Xia and Shang dynasties. It is closely related to the development of the liquor industry and the drinking habits of the people during the Xia and Shang dynasties. Chapter four: discussion on related problems. The name Daguzun has the same name. In the prehistoric and Western Zhou dynasties, there was the same name Daguzun pottery, but it was not necessarily related with this article, and belonged to different kinds of vessels in different times. At the same time, there are still some problems to be solved in the study of Daguzun, such as the origin of Daguzun, the engraving of symbols, the characteristics of pottery, and the manufacture process. Conclusion: this paper summarizes the problems discussed in this paper, and generalizes four points of understanding.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：陜西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：K876.3

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 高明;論陶符兼談漢字的起源[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);1984年06期

2 方向明;史前東方大口尊初論[J];東南文化;1998年04期

3 安金槐;;關(guān)于鄭州商代二里崗期陶器分期問題的再探討[J];華夏考古;1988年04期

4 ;鄭州洛達廟遺址發(fā)掘報告[J];華夏考古;1989年04期

5 李昌韜;;鄭州市木材公司商代遺址發(fā)掘簡報[J];華夏考古;1990年04期

6 陳淑卿;山東地區(qū)商文化編年與類型研究[J];華夏考古;2003年01期

7 齊東林;魯紅衛(wèi);祝賀;李素婷;武志江;丁新功;;河南三門峽市南家莊遺址的調(diào)查與試掘[J];華夏考古;2007年04期

8 ;1995年鄭州小雙橋遺址的發(fā)掘[J];華夏考古;1996年03期

9 ;濟南大辛莊遺址試掘簡報[J];考古;1959年04期

10 蔡鳳書;;濟南大辛莊商代遺址的調(diào)查[J];考古;1973年05期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 鄭鐸;新石器時代大口尊研究[D];南京航空航天大學(xué);2008年

2 付建;中原地區(qū)商代中期青銅禮器研究[D];陜西師范大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號：1983161