本文選題：清華簡 + 《尹誥》�。� 參考：《齊魯學(xué)刊》2016年05期

【摘要】：清華簡編者把一篇簡文題為《尹誥》,稱它是"《尚書》中的一篇",是真"古文《尚書》"。這個說法,存在很多問題。歷來《尚書》各本均無《尹誥》之篇名,清華簡題名《尹誥》是誤讀《禮記》和鄭注所致,《尹誥》簡文根本不合《尚書》之"誥"體,且簡文與歷史事實充滿著矛盾。有鑒于此,簡文應(yīng)該是戰(zhàn)國時人編造的有關(guān)伊尹與湯事跡的習(xí)作。
[Abstract]:The editor of Qinghua Bamboo slips entitled Yin Letters, calling it "one of the Shang Shu" and the true "Ancient Chinese Book of Shang Shu". There are many problems with this statement. "Shang Shu" has no title of "Yin Letters". The title of "Yin Letters" is caused by misreading the Book of Rites and Zheng Note, and the "Letters Patent" is not in accordance with the "Letters Patent" of "Shang Shu", and it is full of contradictions with historical facts. In view of this, Jane Wen should be the work of Yi Yin and Tang made up during the warring States period.
【作者單位】： 上海社會科學(xué)院歷史研究所;
【分類號】：K877.5

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 yそ〈，

本文編號：1949788