本文選題：華陽宮 + 寺觀壁畫　； 參考：《西北大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：華陽宮古建筑群位于山東濟(jì)南市東北,華不注山南麓,是目前濟(jì)南地區(qū)最古老的宗教建筑群之一,也是濟(jì)南現(xiàn)存最大的古建筑群體,保存有三百多平方米的古代壁畫。華陽宮古建筑壁畫內(nèi)容涵蓋了儒道佛三教諸神文化,作為當(dāng)?shù)孛耖g宗教起興和發(fā)展的重要體現(xiàn),區(qū)域歷史文化和傳統(tǒng)藝術(shù)的典型代表,其重要的價(jià)值是不言而喻的。 由于自然環(huán)境和人為損毀等原因,華陽宮壁畫正面遭受著嚴(yán)重的破壞,而對其著錄記載資料甚少,系統(tǒng)全面的調(diào)查研究工作更處于空白階段。因此,以保護(hù)修復(fù)為最終目的,對華陽宮壁畫進(jìn)行前期調(diào)查研究,分析壁畫病害形成機(jī)理,探索華陽宮古建筑壁畫保護(hù),既有現(xiàn)實(shí)意義也有科研價(jià)值。 本次對華陽宮古建筑群前期調(diào)查和治理研究,嚴(yán)格遵守文物保護(hù)基本原則和行業(yè)準(zhǔn)則。通過壁畫現(xiàn)狀調(diào)查、制作材料及工藝的分析、環(huán)境監(jiān)測研究、病害機(jī)理的分析等階段,總結(jié)華陽宮壁畫特點(diǎn),參閱大量資料和實(shí)驗(yàn),擬定了后期保護(hù)修復(fù)實(shí)施的總體思路和對策,為華陽宮古建筑壁畫的有效保護(hù)提供了科學(xué)的理論基礎(chǔ)。 通過現(xiàn)狀調(diào)查發(fā)現(xiàn),空鼓是華陽宮壁畫現(xiàn)存最嚴(yán)重的病害,其次是壁畫表面大面積覆蓋物,同時(shí)壁畫的脫落和酥堿也相當(dāng)嚴(yán)重。通過對壁畫制作材料、工藝及病害特點(diǎn)的分析,表面華陽宮壁畫具有寺觀壁畫的典型特征,也存在著寺觀壁畫最普遍的問題。華陽宮壁畫的保護(hù)主要是對壁畫空鼓脫落和表面覆蓋的治理。 分析環(huán)境監(jiān)測數(shù)據(jù)可知,濟(jì)南地區(qū)氣候環(huán)境對殿堂環(huán)境有著直接的影響。水環(huán)境的影響是壁畫目前面臨的最嚴(yán)重問題,而對微環(huán)境的綜合分析結(jié)果顯示殿堂內(nèi)的溫濕度、光照等環(huán)境對華陽宮壁畫的保存影響也很大的。 根據(jù)病害機(jī)理研究顯示,空鼓病害的產(chǎn)生主要與水鹽運(yùn)移、壁畫制作工藝及建筑地質(zhì)環(huán)境有關(guān)：大面積壁畫覆蓋病害的產(chǎn)生主要與近代文化變革和人為破壞有關(guān)；酥堿粉化等病害的形成則主要是環(huán)境溫濕度等變化和壁畫自身材質(zhì)工藝多方面因素作用的結(jié)果。 論文結(jié)合其它地區(qū)寺觀壁畫的研究成果,參考建筑工程施工和石窟、墓葬壁畫保護(hù)領(lǐng)域具有的成熟工藝和技術(shù),針對華陽宮壁畫制作材料、工藝及病害的特殊性,擬定了從防潮阻水到穩(wěn)定性加固,再到時(shí)表面污染及覆蓋層清理實(shí)施的總體治理思路,為后期的保護(hù)修復(fù)和壁畫長期維護(hù)奠定了科學(xué)的理論基礎(chǔ)。
[Abstract]:Huayanggong Ancient Architecture Group is located in the northeast of Jinan City, Shandong Province. It is one of the oldest religious buildings in Jinan, and the largest existing ancient architectural group in Jinan, preserving more than 300 square meters of ancient murals. The contents of the murals of ancient architecture of Huayang Palace cover the culture of Confucianism, Taoism and Buddhism. As an important embodiment of the rise and development of local folk religion, the important value of the frescoes of the regional historical culture and traditional art is self-evident. Due to the natural environment and man-made damage, the front of the frescoes of Huayanggong have suffered serious damage, but the recorded data are very few, and the systematic and comprehensive investigation and research work is still in the blank stage. Therefore, with the ultimate goal of conservation and restoration, the preliminary investigation and research on Huayang Palace murals are carried out, the formation mechanism of mural diseases is analyzed, and the protection of ancient architectural murals of Huayang Palace is explored, which has both practical significance and scientific research value. This investigation and management of Huayang Palace complex, strictly abide by the basic principles of cultural relics protection and industry guidelines. Through the investigation of the current situation of the fresco, the analysis of manufacturing materials and techniques, the study of environmental monitoring, and the analysis of the mechanism of the disease, the characteristics of the frescoes of Huayanggong are summarized, and a great deal of data and experiments are consulted. The general ideas and countermeasures for the implementation of protection and restoration in the later period are worked out, which provides a scientific theoretical basis for the effective protection of the ancient architectural murals of Huayang Palace. Through the investigation, it is found that empty drum is the most serious disease existing in the fresco of Huayanggong, followed by a large area of covering on the surface of the mural, at the same time, the shedding of the murals and the alkalinity are quite serious. Through the analysis of the materials, techniques and disease characteristics of the murals, it is found that the surface frescoes of the Huayang Palace have the typical characteristics of the temple murals, and there are also the most common problems in the temple murals. Huayanggong mural protection is mainly to the mural empty drum falling off and surface covering treatment. Analysis of environmental monitoring data shows that the climate environment in Jinan has a direct impact on the temple environment. The influence of water environment is the most serious problem that the fresco faces at present. The comprehensive analysis of the microenvironment shows that the temperature, humidity and illumination in the hall have great influence on the preservation of the frescoes of Huayanggong. According to the study of disease mechanism, the occurrence of empty drum disease is mainly related to the movement of water and salt, the mural making technology and the building geological environment. The formation of diseases such as caustic soda powder is mainly the result of the changes of environment temperature and humidity and the effect of many factors on the materials of murals themselves. Based on the research results of temple murals in other regions, and referring to the mature techniques and techniques in the field of building construction and grottoes, the paper aims at the particularity of the materials, techniques and diseases of the frescoes in Huayanggong. The overall control ideas from moisture-proof and water-proof to stability reinforcement and then surface pollution and overlay cleaning were worked out, which laid a scientific theoretical foundation for the later period of protection and restoration and long-term maintenance of murals.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：K879.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張曉東;;奉國寺大雄殿的元、明時(shí)期壁畫[J];邊疆考古研究;2010年00期

2 馬贊峰,汪萬福,王雪瑩,李樹若,趙林毅,付有旭;西藏幾處重要文化古跡壁畫現(xiàn)狀考察[J];中國藏學(xué);2002年03期

3 汪萬福,李最雄,馬贊峰,付有旭,丁長征,樊再軒;西藏布達(dá)拉宮東大殿空鼓病害壁畫保護(hù)修復(fù)研究[J];中國藏學(xué);2005年03期

4 趙林毅;汪萬福;馬贊峰;張國彬;蘇伯民;楊韜;;西藏羅布林卡壁畫病害成因及其防治對策[J];中國藏學(xué);2009年03期

5 郭麗平;;北京法海寺壁畫中的藏傳佛教藝術(shù)因素探析[J];中國藏學(xué);2010年S1期

6 徐位業(yè) ,周國信 ,李云鶴;莫高窟壁畫、彩塑無機(jī)顏料的X射線剖析報(bào)告[J];敦煌研究;1983年00期

7 李最雄 ,Stefan Michalski;光和濕度對土紅、朱砂和鉛丹變色的影響[J];敦煌研究;1989年03期

8 盛芬玲,李最雄,樊再軒;濕度是鉛丹變色的主要因素[J];敦煌研究;1990年04期

9 蘇伯民,李最雄,馬贊峰,李實(shí),馬清林;克孜爾石窟壁畫顏料研究[J];敦煌研究;2000年01期

10 王進(jìn)玉;敦煌石窟合成群青顏料的研究[J];敦煌研究;2000年01期

相關(guān)會議論文 前2條

1 王方;曲亮;;幾處寺觀壁畫保存現(xiàn)狀的調(diào)查研究[A];中國文物保護(hù)技術(shù)協(xié)會第五次學(xué)術(shù)年會論文集[C];2007年

2 于群力;楊秋穎;黨小娟;;韓城大禹廟壁畫的揭取保護(hù)與復(fù)原[A];中國文物保護(hù)技術(shù)協(xié)會第二屆學(xué)術(shù)年會論文集[C];2002年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 金萍;瞿曇寺壁畫的藝術(shù)考古研究[D];西安美術(shù)學(xué)院;2012年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 李國華;朔州崇福寺彌陀殿壁畫研究[D];太原理工大學(xué);2011年

2 張艷杰;敦煌莫高窟第87窟現(xiàn)狀調(diào)查和主要病害成因研究[D];蘭州大學(xué);2011年

3 劉愛琴;永樂宮純陽殿壁畫中的建筑景觀研究[D];山西大學(xué);2011年

4 夏寅;偏光顯微法在中國古代顏料分析中的應(yīng)用研究及相關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)庫建設(shè)[D];西北大學(xué);2006年

5 齊敬峰;壁畫與環(huán)境的交互性[D];山東師范大學(xué);2006年

6 趙林毅;布達(dá)拉宮壁畫的保護(hù)修復(fù)[D];蘭州大學(xué);2007年

7 伊寶;青龍寺腰殿壁畫的藝術(shù)語言及相關(guān)文化探索[D];山西大學(xué);2007年

8 趙明榮;永安寺壁畫繪制年代考[D];北京大學(xué);2004年

9 嚴(yán)靜;中國古建油飾彩畫顏料成分分析及制作工藝研究[D];西北大學(xué);2010年

10 秦曉英;巖山寺文殊殿壁畫風(fēng)俗圖畫研究[D];山西大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號：1943860