發(fā)布時間：2018-05-25 23:04

  本文選題：景教 + 敦煌文獻��； 參考：《上海師范大學》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：自從景教敦煌文獻現(xiàn)世,學界對它們的研究,就未曾停止。在取得一些好成績的同時,許多問題也遲遲得不到解決。2003年,林悟殊先生將其多年研究景教的文章,集結為《唐代景教再研究》出版。未等學界有明確的回應,林先生再接再厲,于2005年集結出版《中古三夷教辯證》,提出了一些新的觀點。在兩書中,林先生對多部景教文獻進行了多方面的質疑。至今,其觀點有被證實的,有懸疑未決的。本文所擬以解決的,就是包括林先生所提出,現(xiàn)在還懸疑未決的一些問題,以及原本就存在的一些問題。 首先是《序聽迷詩所經(jīng)》和《一神論》的研究,本文分寫卷分為底本和抄本。首先對原卷的形成原因進行研究,從景教教會儀式和《序聽迷詩所經(jīng)》題名,以及對景教譯經(jīng)歷史的考證,得出早期的這兩部寫卷,并非是翻譯的經(jīng)典,也非后來學界退一步所認為的譯撰結合的作品,乃是景教教會神職人員講道時的現(xiàn)場記錄。這種錄文因為宗教文化的隔膜和語言不通,以及現(xiàn)場講道的實時性等原因,造成原卷文字漏寫、錯寫,句子顛倒,譯名不雅和不統(tǒng)一,難以校勘等諸多問題。其次,從唐朝的寫經(jīng)制度以及景教的供奉經(jīng)典的宗教實踐中,考證抄本的形成原因。得出此抄本為宗教供奉的產(chǎn)物,出自職業(yè)抄經(jīng)人之手。因為宗教文化隔膜、原卷就有錯誤和不易辨認以及職業(yè)抄經(jīng)人的抄經(jīng)目的等原因,解決抄本的外觀和文本內容的不統(tǒng)一、《序聽迷詩所經(jīng)》經(jīng)題中的錯誤、《一神論》的三部分沒有一致性以及何以沒有進行校勘等問題。 本文還因《序聽迷詩所經(jīng)》和《一神論》兩部寫卷的文本內容難以閱讀,錯誤較多之故,對這兩部寫卷,進行了文字訓詁考證。結合文本語境和上下文,提出看法,尋找證據(jù),并且對已經(jīng)被證明的字句,進行解讀,以期增加幾份文本的可閱讀性。當然,文本難以解讀的地方還有很多,需要繼續(xù)努力。 其次是《志玄安樂經(jīng)》,本文根據(jù)有幸獲得日本方面出版的此經(jīng)原卷圖版,對學界爭執(zhí)已久的羽田先生和佐伯先生的錄文,分別進行了校對,并提供的自己的錄文和句讀,以期比較好的解決錄文問題。并且,對該經(jīng)的宗教思想,分別進行方法論和根本依據(jù)兩方面的分析。從分析出的結果,以及與佛道以及基督教的宗教思想進行的對比來看。該經(jīng)的宗教思想,無論從方法論還是從根本依據(jù)方面來說,都不具備基督教在這些問題上的核心特征,倒是與佛道兩教的思想,頗為接近。作為時代的產(chǎn)物,對于外教思想,該經(jīng)處于一種欲拒實迎的尷尬處境中。
[Abstract]:Ever since the Dunhuang literature of Jingjiao came into being, the academic circles have never stopped studying them. At the same time, many problems have not been solved. In 2003, Mr. Lin Wushu published his articles on Jingjiao in Tang Dynasty. Without a clear response from scholars, Mr. Lin continued his efforts and published Dialectics of the three Yi religions in the Middle Ages in 2005, and put forward some new points of view. In the two books, Mr. Lin questioned a number of literature on Jingjiao in many ways. So far, its views have been confirmed, there are suspense. This paper is intended to solve, including Mr. Lin put forward, there are still some unresolved issues, as well as some of the existing problems. The first is the study of preface listening to the Book of Mysteries and monotheism. This paper is divided into two parts: the original and the transcript. First of all, this paper studies the reasons for the formation of the original volume, from the title of the Jingjiao church ritual, the preface to listening to the lost poem, and the textual research on the history of the translation of the scripture of Jingjiao, and concludes that the early writing of these two volumes is not a classic of translation. Nor is it the combination of translation and compilation that scholars later considered to be a live record of the sermons of the clergy of the Scenic Church. Because of the religious culture and language impassability, as well as the real time of the scene sermon, it causes many problems, such as omitting, miswriting, sentence inversion, inelegant and inunified translation, difficult to collate, and so on. Secondly, from the system of writing scriptures in Tang Dynasty and the religious practice of offering scriptures to Jingjiao, the reasons for the formation of manuscripts are proved. This copy is the product of religious worship, written by professional scribes. Because of the religious and cultural divide, the original volume is wrong and difficult to identify, as well as professional scripture copying purposes and other reasons, To solve the problems such as the disunity of the appearance of the transcript and the content of the text, the mistakes in the title of "preface listening to the Classics of lost Poetry", the lack of consistency among the three parts of "monotheism" and the reason why there is no collation. Due to the difficulty of reading the texts of preface listening to lost Poetry and monotheism, this paper makes textual research on these two volumes. Combined with the context and context of the text, this paper puts forward some opinions, looks for evidence, and interprets the proven words and phrases in order to increase the readability of several texts. Of course, the text is difficult to interpret a lot of areas, need to continue to work. Then there is the Book of Zhixuan Anle. According to the original volume of the book, which has been published by the Japanese side, this paper proofread the transcripts of Mr. Haneda and Mr. Zobo, who have been in dispute in academic circles for a long time, and provided their own transcripts and sentences. With a view to a better solution to the problem of recording. In addition, the religious thoughts of the Sutra are analyzed in two aspects: methodology and fundamental basis. From the analysis of the results, as well as with the Buddhist and Christian religious thought of comparison. In terms of methodology and fundamental basis, the religious thought of the Sutra does not possess the core characteristics of Christianity on these issues, but it is quite close to the thought of Buddhism and Taoism. As the product of the times, the thought of foreign teachers is in an awkward situation of refusing to accept the truth.
【學位授予單位】：上海師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：K870.6

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前3條

1 陸慶夫;魏郭輝;;唐代官方佛經(jīng)抄寫制度述論[J];敦煌研究;2009年03期

2 王元軍;從敦煌唐佛經(jīng)寫本談有關唐代寫經(jīng)生及其書法藝術的幾個問題[J];敦煌研究;1995年01期

3 王紹峰;《漢語景教文典詮釋》指謬[J];古籍整理研究學刊;2001年04期

，

本文編號：1934993