本文選題：白音長汗遺址 + 遺址形成過程��； 參考：《吉林大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：白音長汗遺址是遼西地區(qū)已發(fā)現(xiàn)并大規(guī)模發(fā)掘的重要遺址之一，遺跡多樣——包括房址、墓葬、灰坑、壕溝；遺存時段豐富——包括小河西文化、興隆洼文化、趙寶溝文化、紅山文化以及小河沿文化。該遺址對研究中國遼西地區(qū)史前生計方式、生活狀況、社會組織以及意識形態(tài)等方面具有極大的學(xué)術(shù)價值。 遺址形成過程理論在美國已經(jīng)有40多年的研究史，本文以遺址的廢棄過程為主要切入點(diǎn)，，結(jié)合白音長汗遺址的發(fā)掘報告材料，分析該遺址的各個階段房址的廢棄過程。 通過對白音長汗遺址五期七類遺存的房址居住面活動區(qū)觀察、分析以及對比，結(jié)合遺址形成過程理論的原理，我們對白音長汗遺址的廢棄方式與過程有了一定的認(rèn)識。該遺址的廢棄方式可以分成三類：第一類是有返回計劃的、迅速的廢棄，如二期乙類的房址；第二類是有計劃返回的、緩慢的廢棄，如趙寶溝文化時期的房址；第三類是沒有返回計劃的、徹底的廢棄，如紅山文化時期的房址。 這些廢棄方式上的區(qū)別可能與不斷發(fā)展的定居能力有關(guān)，興隆洼文化時期人們的定居能力還比較弱，人們可能需要較為頻繁地暫時離開居址去狩獵采集某些資源，從而形成第一類廢棄方式。到了趙寶溝文化時期，定居能力提高，人們離開居址的頻率下降，但離開的時間可能延長，所以存在一定的離開前的收拾安置，從而形成第二類廢棄方式。到了紅山文化時期，定居能力進(jìn)一步提高，人們可能無須季節(jié)性地離開居址，最后形成第三類廢棄方式。 通過廢棄過程研究，我們可以從另一個角度來了解史前社會的發(fā)展?fàn)顩r。
[Abstract]:The Baiyinchang Khan site is one of the most important sites that have been discovered and excavated on a large scale in western Liaoning. The ruins are diverse including houses, tombs, ash pits, trenches, and there are plenty of remaining periods-including small Hexi culture, Xinglongwa culture, and Zhao Baogou culture. Hongshan culture and Xiaohe River culture. The site is of great academic value for the study of prehistoric livelihood, living conditions, social organization and ideology in western Liaoning. The theory of site formation process has been studied for more than 40 years in the United States. This paper takes the abandoned process of the site as the main breakthrough point and analyzes the abandoned process of the house site in each stage of the site by combining with the excavation report materials of the Baiyin Chang Khan site. Based on the observation, analysis and comparison of the living areas of the five periods and seven kinds of houses left at the Baiyinchang Khan site, combined with the theory of the formation process of the site, we have a certain understanding of the abandoned way and process of the Baiyin Chang Khan site. The abandoned ways of the site can be divided into three categories: the first type is rapidly abandoned with return plan, such as second stage B house site, the second kind is planned return, slowly abandoned, such as Zhao Baogou culture period house site; The third category is unplanned, completely abandoned, such as the Hongshan Cultural site. These differences in abandonment may be related to the growing ability to settle, which was weak during the Xinglongwa culture and may require people to leave their settlements for a while more frequently to hunt for certain resources. As a result, the first type of abandoned mode is formed. In the period of Zhao Baogou culture, the settlement ability was improved, the frequency of people leaving their residence decreased, but the time of leaving may be prolonged, so there is a certain arrangement before leaving, thus forming the second kind of abandoned way. In the period of Hongshan culture, the settlement capacity was further improved, people may not have to leave the residence seasonally, and finally form the third type of abandonment. Through the study of waste process, we can understand the development of prehistoric society from another angle.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：K878

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 陳繼玲;陳勝前;;興隆洼文化筒形罐的紋飾藝術(shù)分析[J];邊疆考古研究;2012年01期

2 高蒙河,陳淳;考古學(xué)次生堆積的研究與探索[J];華夏考古;2001年02期

3 陳勝前;;燕山—長城南北地區(qū)史前文化的適應(yīng)變遷[J];考古學(xué)報;2011年01期

4 胡保華;;內(nèi)蒙古白音長汗二期乙類遺存房址居住面上遺存分析[J];內(nèi)蒙古文物考古;2010年02期

5 陳勝前;;細(xì)石葉工藝產(chǎn)品廢棄的文化過程研究[J];人類學(xué)學(xué)報;2008年03期

本文編號：1806177