本文選題：甲骨刻辭　切入點(diǎn)：數(shù)量表達(dá)式　出處：《西南大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文主要基于分類、斷代兩個緯度探討甲骨刻辭數(shù)量表達(dá)式的使用情況。 語言學(xué)界研究漢語數(shù)量表達(dá)的學(xué)術(shù)成果不少,研究甲骨刻辭語法的成果也不少,但這些成果中反映甲骨刻辭時代數(shù)量表達(dá)式使用情況的卻不多。傳統(tǒng)語言學(xué)憑借經(jīng)驗(yàn)、長于描寫、重在歸納,卻無法對甲骨刻辭數(shù)量表達(dá)的復(fù)雜性做出滿意的解釋,尤其是各種數(shù)量表達(dá)式的使用場合和時間層次問題。因此其研究自身也存在著諸多的疑點(diǎn),相關(guān)結(jié)論的可信度也就值得重新思考。與以往研究不同的,本文立足宏觀,著眼微觀,在語序類型學(xué)和歷史語言學(xué)理論指引下對甲骨刻辭數(shù)量表達(dá)式進(jìn)行定量考察,專題分析。主要考察各數(shù)量表達(dá)式語序類型的功能差異和歷時層次,同時涉及漢語量詞的早期發(fā)展?fàn)顩r�；菊J(rèn)識是甲骨刻辭各種各樣數(shù)量表達(dá)式表面共存,實(shí)則有別,是漢語早期語序類型調(diào)整過程中的過渡現(xiàn)象。具體到甲骨刻辭數(shù)量表達(dá)式的體詞性向心結(jié)構(gòu)的性質(zhì)來講,是順行結(jié)構(gòu)向逆行結(jié)構(gòu)轉(zhuǎn)變過程中的過渡性層疊現(xiàn)象。其間經(jīng)歷了數(shù)字“十”的位數(shù)化、順行結(jié)構(gòu)逆向化等交互過程,其原因是早期漢語與其他語言接觸融合以及漢語韻律結(jié)構(gòu)雙音節(jié)化等促發(fā)下的重新分析。這一結(jié)論與語言地理類型學(xué)和漢藏語系原始漢藏語的SOV語序假設(shè)吻合。本文假設(shè)漢語早期順行結(jié)構(gòu)的逆行化過程與歷史上的北方原始胡氐語的歷次南漸有關(guān)。而在此過程中所形成的順逆混合結(jié)構(gòu)造成了早期量詞的產(chǎn)生。我們可以從甲骨刻辭數(shù)量表達(dá)式三種語序類型的歷史層次和話語功能分布中找到一些蛛絲馬跡。 論文分八章： 第一章緒論。交代研究對象、主要論題、基本思想、研究創(chuàng)新、研究旨趣、研究方法和研究框架。 第二章綜述。概述甲骨刻辭數(shù)量表達(dá)式的研究成果以及數(shù)量表達(dá)在漢語和漢藏語中的研究情況。 以下四章是根據(jù)數(shù)量表達(dá)在話語功能和歷史層次上的不同表現(xiàn)對甲骨刻辭數(shù)量表達(dá)式做分組、斷代整理。三、四、五章是分論,六章是綜論。即： 第三章甲骨刻辭征伐、獵獲數(shù)量表達(dá)式整理與研究； 第四章甲骨刻辭祭牲、對象數(shù)量表達(dá)式整理與研究； 第五章甲骨刻辭納貢、時間數(shù)量表達(dá)式整理與研究； 第六章甲骨刻辭數(shù)量表達(dá)式分類、斷代整理綜論。 第七章基于語序類型學(xué)視野下的句法歷時演變假設(shè),對甲骨刻辭多種多樣的數(shù)量表達(dá)式進(jìn)行歷時系聯(lián),對漢藏語系數(shù)量表達(dá)系統(tǒng)的早期歷史演變和早期量詞的語法化過程做了嘗試性的構(gòu)擬。 第八章結(jié)語和展望。對全文的內(nèi)容、主要觀點(diǎn)進(jìn)行總結(jié),并提出今后研究的問題。
[Abstract]:This paper is mainly based on the classification, dating two latitude to explore the use of condition number of oracle bone inscriptions expression.
Many academic achievements in linguistics, the study of Chinese expression quantity, research of oracle bone inscriptions grammar achievements are many, but these results reflect the number of times the expression of oracle bone inscriptions usage is not much. The traditional linguistics with experience, longer than the description focuses on induction, but no complexity of oracle bone inscriptions number expression to make satisfactory explain, especially the use of various occasions and time level number expression. Therefore the research itself has many doubts, the credibility of the relevant conclusions are worth rethinking. Different from previous studies, this paper based on the macro, micro focus, in the guidance of word order typology and historical linguistics theory on the number of oracle bone inscriptions the expression of quantitative studies, thematic analysis. Mainly investigates the functional differences between the amount of expression of the type of word order and diachronic level, while early involving Chinese measure words. The basic knowledge is development. All kinds of oracle bone inscriptions number expression surface coexist, actually has not, is a transitional phenomenon early order type adjustment process in Chinese. The specific properties of the nominal centripetal structure to the oracle bone inscriptions number expression is concerned, is the direct inverse structure to the structure during the transition phenomenon. During the transitional layer experienced "ten" figures, such as the structure of the reverse direct interaction process, the reason is the re analysis of the early Chinese and other language contact fusion and prosodic structure of double syllable from next. This conclusion with the geography of language typology and Sino Tibetan original Tibetan SOV order hypothesis. The hypothesis of retrograde during the process of the early history of Chinese direct structure on the original Hu Diyu previous North South gradually. But in the process of the formation of mixed structure caused by reverse The early classifiers. We can find some traces from the oracle bone inscriptions number expressions of the three order type historical level and discourse function distribution.
The thesis is divided into eight chapters.
The first chapter is the introduction. The research object, the main topic, the basic idea, the research innovation, the research purport, the research method and the research framework.
絎簩绔犵患榪，

本文編號：1673020