本文選題：廣州地區(qū)　切入點：兩漢墓葬　出處：《南京大學》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文著眼于廣州地區(qū)迄今所發(fā)現(xiàn)的兩漢時期的墓葬材料,通過對墓葬形制及陶器隨葬品組合的分析,揭示了廣州地區(qū)兩漢墓葬形制的變化趨勢以及地方文化與北方中原文化之間的互動關系。 廣州地區(qū)兩漢墓葬的發(fā)掘,依據(jù)主要對象、區(qū)域的不同,可以分成1953年至1983年、1983年至1995年和1995年至今三個階段。廣州地區(qū)漢墓的有關研究,根據(jù)研究對象的差異可以分為隨葬品的研究,墓葬形制、年代的探討和文化層面的分析三類。在客觀評價這些研究的基礎上,對其中存在的問題與不足進行了總結與反思,提出本文的選題緣由及創(chuàng)新之處。 第一章對廣州地區(qū)漢墓的形制進行探討,依據(jù)墓葬建造用材的不同,把廣州地區(qū)漢墓分成土坑墓、木槨墓和磚室墓三大類。本章運用考古類型學的方法對每一類墓葬的形制進行分析并劃分型式,并參考墓葬報告確定的年代對墓葬各型、式進行統(tǒng)計,分析墓葬年代的判斷是否合理以及本文的型式劃分的科學性。土坑墓僅出現(xiàn)于西漢前、中期,木槨墓出現(xiàn)于西漢前期至東漢后期并盛行于西漢中、后期,磚室墓僅出現(xiàn)于東漢時期。在墓葬形制方面,木槨墓、磚室墓有著相同的演變趨勢或規(guī)律：棺室功能逐漸單一化,隨葬品逐漸與棺室分離,出現(xiàn)單獨的隨葬品擺放空間,如邊箱、器物箱,隨葬品主要置放于前室表明隨葬品擺放空間的最終成熟。 第二章對廣州地區(qū)漢墓的隨葬陶器分組進行研究,選取具有代表性的地方特色陶器組、陶禮器組和模型明器組三組陶器進行分析,地方特色陶器組代表了地方文化,陶禮器組則代表北方中原文化,模型明器組雖是從中原地區(qū)傳入的,但也融入了地方文化。通過統(tǒng)計的方式得出每類陶器組合的主要分布時段及其在各型墓葬中的隨葬比例,每類陶器組合的主要分布時段反映出其所代表的文化的流行時段。地方特色陶器組盛行于西漢前、中期,表明廣州地區(qū)地方文化在西漢前、中期占主要地位。陶禮器組從西漢前期起逐漸盛行,到東漢前期達到頂峰,表明北方中原文化對廣州地區(qū)的影響不斷加強,陶禮器組的地方化現(xiàn)象說明中原文化在傳入過程中也會受地方文化的影響。模型明器組整體上呈不斷發(fā)展的趨勢并盛行于西漢后期至東漢后期,其部分器形融入了地方色彩。中原文化在傳入廣州的過程中對地方文化造成較大沖擊,但地方文化也對中原文化產生影響,出現(xiàn)地方化的中原文化,二者之間的影響是相互的。 第三章在前面兩章研究的基礎上,依據(jù)墓葬形制的演變規(guī)律,將廣州地區(qū)漢墓重新確定為“無隨葬品空間期”、“隨葬品空間出現(xiàn)期”和“隨葬品空間成熟期”三個時期,又依據(jù)隨葬器物組合的不同,將廣州地區(qū)漢墓分為“地方特色期”和“模型明器期”兩大期。這兩種分期存在交叉,土坑墓、木槨墓的無隨葬品空間期和部分隨葬品空間出現(xiàn)期的墓葬屬于“地方特色期”；木槨墓的部分隨葬品空間出現(xiàn)期和隨葬品空間成熟期的墓葬以及磚室墓屬于“模型明器期”。 文章最后對研究情況作了概括和總結,認為在文化大一統(tǒng)的前提下,廣州地區(qū)的地方文化并沒有消失,仍以不同的方式繼續(xù)存在并發(fā)展著。
[Abstract]:This paper focuses on the Guangzhou area so far found in Han Dynasty burial materials, through the analysis of the tombs and pottery funerary objects combined, reveals the change trend in Guangzhou Han tombs and the interaction between the local culture and the culture of North Central Plains.
The Han Dynasty tombs excavated in Guangzhou area, according to the main object, can be divided into different regions, from 1953 to 1983, 1983 to 1995 and 1995 has three stages. The related research in Guangzhou area, according to the difference of the subject can be divided into the study, burial tombs, in the discussion and analysis of three kinds of culture based on these studies. The objective evaluation, the existing problems and shortcomings are summarized and reflection, put forward the topic and innovation of this paper.
The first chapter of the shapes of the tombs in Guangzhou area are discussed, on the basis of building materials to the tombs, the tombs in Guangzhou area is divided into a pit tomb, wooden coffin tomb brick tomb and three kinds of shapes. This chapter uses the method of archaeological typology for each of these tombs were analyzed and divided type, and reference tombs dating report the tombs of various types, type of statistical analysis, to determine whether it is reasonable and the tombs of this type of science. The tomb pit appeared only in the Western Han Dynasty before the mid and late Western Han Dynasty to the wooden coffin tomb appeared in the late Eastern Han Dynasty and prevailed in the west of Hanzhoung, and the brick tomb appeared only in the Eastern Han Dynasty Tombs in. Hand, wooden coffin tomb brick tomb, have the same trend or pattern: coffin room function single gradually, gradually separate funerary objects and the coffin room, alone the funerary objects placed in space, such as the side box, for bins, funerary objects mainly Placed in the antechamber that funerary objects display space to reach maturity.
The second chapter of the Guangzhou area Han funerary potteries grouped, selected local representative pottery, pottery group and model group three of burial pottery, pottery group on behalf of the local characteristics of local culture, pottery group represents the culture of North Central Plains, although group model burial was introduced from the Central Plains region, but also into the local culture. Through statistical means the main distribution period each kind of combination and its proportion in the funerary pottery in the tombs of various types, each type of pottery combination mainly reflects the time period represented by the popular culture. The local characteristics in the Western Han Dynasty pottery group prevailed before the mid show Guangzhou local culture in the Western Han Dynasty before the mid occupies the main position. From the early Western Han Dynasty pottery group has gradually prevailed, to the early Eastern Han Dynasty reached its peak, that the North Central Plains culture influence on Guangzhou area not Strengthening the local pottery, the phenomenon that the Central Plains culture group will be affected by the local culture in the incoming process. The whole model burial group showed a continuous developing trend and popular in the late Western Han Dynasty to the late Eastern Han Dynasty, its shape into a local color. The culture of the Central Plains have a big impact on the local culture in the process. In Guangzhou, the local culture but also affect the culture of the Central Plains, the local culture of the Central Plains, influence between the two is mutual.
In the third chapter, based on the previous two chapters, based on evolution of tombs, the tombs in Guangzhou area will be reclassified as "no burial space", "burial space" and "space funerary objects mature" three periods, and on the basis of funerary objects of different combinations of the tombs in Guangzhou area divided into "local characteristics" and "model burial period" of two stages. The two stage cross, pit tomb, no funerary objects and funerary objects part of space space period tombs belonging to the "local" wooden coffin tomb; wooden coffin tomb part of funerary objects and funerary objects of space space maturity of the tombs and the brick chambered tombs belonging to the "model burial period".
At the end of the paper, the research situation is summarized and concluded. Under the premise of cultural unification, Guangzhou's local culture has not disappeared, but it continues to exist and develop in different ways.

【學位授予單位】：南京大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：K878.8

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 黃新生;釋“扶桑”[J];東南文化;1990年03期

2 楊琮;論西漢東、南兩越考古學文化的關系[J];東南文化;1990年05期

3 劉曉民;南越國時期漢越文化的并存與融合[J];東南文化;1999年01期

4 麥英豪;;廣州東郊羅岡秦墓發(fā)掘簡報[J];考古;1962年08期

5 黃展岳;;南越國出土鐵器的初步考察[J];考古;1996年03期

6 朱海仁;;廣州市橫枝崗西漢墓的清理[J];考古;2003年05期

7 胡建;楊勇;溫敬偉;;廣州市南越國宮署遺址2003年發(fā)掘簡報[J];考古;2007年03期

8 劉瑞;李灶新;;廣州南越國宮署遺址2000年發(fā)掘報告[J];考古學報;2002年02期

9 朱海仁;;廣州黃花崗漢唐墓葬發(fā)掘報告[J];考古學報;2004年04期

10 黃展岳;關于兩廣出土北方動物紋牌飾問題[J];考古與文物;1996年02期

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 余靜;中國南方地區(qū)兩漢墓葬研究[D];吉林大學;2009年

相關碩士學位論文 前3條

1 逯鵬;嶺南漢墓出土陶屋的初步分析[D];廈門大學;2008年

2 覃杰;廣州漢墓出土人物俑的發(fā)現(xiàn)與研究[D];吉林大學;2010年

3 居方方;嶺南地區(qū)西漢中小型墓葬研究[D];鄭州大學;2010年

，

本文編號：1656079