本文選題：具茨山刻劃符號　切入點：形體　出處：《鄭州大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：具茨山地處中原腹地,積淀有深厚的歷史文化因素,1988年在具茨山上發(fā)現(xiàn)了巨量巖畫,它不僅填補了中原巖畫空白的缺憾,也為中原文化、歷史、和文字研究提供豐富的資料。2008~2009年考古工作者在對具茨山巖畫進(jìn)行的調(diào)查過程中發(fā)現(xiàn),這批巖畫中有126個刻劃符號,其中有43個與現(xiàn)有甲骨文在形體上具有較高的契合度,占這批刻劃符號的34.13%。目前,具茨山巖畫的研究成果主要集中在巖畫內(nèi)涵的解讀上,對具茨山刻劃符號形體的研究還有待于進(jìn)一步的深入。為考察具茨山刻劃符號與現(xiàn)有甲骨文之間的關(guān)系,對具茨山刻劃符號形體做初步探究,本文首先將具茨山刻劃符號與甲骨文作形體上的對比,單純的形體對比并不足以說明它們之間有什么必然聯(lián)系,因為這之間缺少證據(jù)鏈條將二者連接起來,這是本文的重點,也是難點。之后便以時間為序,文章將河南省現(xiàn)有的早期的各個時期、各個遺址的刻劃符號都整理出來,與具茨山刻劃符號、甲骨文一一比對,探究具茨山刻劃符號、河南早期刻劃符號與甲骨文在形體上與甲骨文所擁有的共性,是否具備一脈相承的關(guān)系。無論是歷史文獻(xiàn)還是歷史傳說,總是將黃帝與具茨山與新鄭聯(lián)系起來,而黃帝時代又有倉頡造字的傳說,文獻(xiàn)記載的黃帝活動的歷史時期與具茨山刻劃符號現(xiàn)所考察的年代有一個階段性重合,本文充分考慮具茨山獨特的地理環(huán)境、歷史文化背景和時代性,從歷時和共時兩個角度展開論證,并結(jié)合相關(guān)的文字學(xué)、考古學(xué)、歷史傳說、歷史文獻(xiàn)等各方面的研究成果,為具茨山刻劃符號形體探究提供新的思路和方法。本文采取歸納和比較的方法展開對具茨山刻劃符號形體的初步探究,為探尋河南早期刻劃符號與文字之間的關(guān)系提供大致的脈絡(luò)和新的依據(jù),充分展示具茨山刻劃符號所具備的文字學(xué)價值,呈現(xiàn)一個關(guān)于具茨山刻劃符號形體研究的新認(rèn)識。
[Abstract]:Situated in the hinterland of the Central Plains, there are profound historical and cultural factors. In 1988, huge quantities of rock paintings were discovered on the mountain, which not only filled the gap of the central Plains rock paintings, but also served as the culture and history of the Central Plains. From 2008 to 2009, archaeologists found that there are 126 symbols in these rock paintings, 43 of which have a high degree of agreement with the existing oracle inscriptions. At present, the research results of rock paintings in the Jutz Mountains are mainly focused on the interpretation of the connotation of rock paintings. In order to investigate the relationship between the symbolism and the existing oracle bone inscriptions, this paper makes a preliminary study on the symbolic form of the Tutzishan inscription, in order to investigate the relationship between the symbolic form and the existing oracle bone inscriptions. In this paper, we first compare the figurative symbols with oracle bone inscriptions. The simple contrast is not enough to show the necessary connection between them, because there is a lack of evidence chain between them, which is the focus of this paper. It is also a difficult point. Then, in the order of time, the article arranges the symbols of each site in the early periods of Henan Province, and compares them with the inscriptions of the Tutzshan Mountains, the oracle inscriptions, and probes into the symbols of the Takeshan Mountains. In the early period of Henan Province, symbols and oracle bone inscriptions had in common with the oracle bone inscriptions, whether they were related in the same vein or not. Whether they were historical documents or historical legends, they always connected Huangdi with Jutzishan and Xinzheng. In the Yellow Emperor period, there was a legend of Cangjie character creation. The historical period of Huangdi's activities recorded in the literature coincided with the period under investigation of the carved symbols of the Jutzishan Mountains. This paper fully considered the unique geographical environment of the mountain. Historical and cultural background and the nature of the times, from the two angles of diachronic and synchronic, and combined with the related philology, archaeology, historical legends, historical documents and other aspects of research results, A new way of thinking and method is provided for the exploration of the symbolic form of the Tutzhan. This paper takes the method of induction and comparison to carry out the preliminary exploration of the symbolic form of the picturing of the Tutz Mountain. In order to explore the relationship between characters and symbols in the early period of Henan Province, this paper provides a general context and new basis, fully demonstrates the philological value of the descriptive symbols of the Tutzshan Mountains, and presents a new understanding of the research on the shape of the symbols in the inscriptions of the Mt.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：K877.49;H121

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 申永峰 ,張禮剛;民族圣地具茨山[J];中州統(tǒng)戰(zhàn);2002年04期

2 徐海亮;;具茨山上的涉水文化密碼[J];河南水利與南水北調(diào);2009年01期

3 尹全海;張新斌;;黃帝文化與具茨山文化圈[J];中州學(xué)刊;2010年05期

4 許順湛;;具茨山之名解讀[J];中原文物;2009年04期

5 劉五一;;具茨山巖畫的初步研究[J];三峽論壇(三峽文學(xué).理論版);2010年03期

6 蔡杰;;論具茨山巖畫與黃帝文化的深厚淵源[J];美與時代(中);2011年02期

7 周昆叔;;上古時代中國人的杰作:具茨山巖畫 中華文明起源的隱秘信息[J];文明;2009年03期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前10條

1 記者 馮朝暉;具茨山與中華文明學(xué)術(shù)研討會在京召開[N];中國文物報;2013年

2 本報記者 黨賀喜　通訊員 王建軍;破解具茨山上的“天問密碼”[N];鄭州日報;2008年

3 本報記者 覃巖峰;具茨山巖畫具有劃時代意義[N];鄭州日報;2009年

4 記者 韓祖和　王振江;泌陽驚現(xiàn)上千處具茨山類型“天書”[N];駐馬店日報;2010年

5 記者 左麗慧;具茨巖刻多神奇專家呼吁快保護(hù)[N];鄭州日報;2009年

6 本報記者 覃巖峰;對研究文字起源有重要意義[N];鄭州日報;2009年

7 左麗慧;“巨石遺存”驚現(xiàn)具茨山[N];鄭州日報;2009年

8 本報記者 高凱;具茨山見證崢嶸歲月[N];鄭州日報;2011年

9 白全貴;具茨山巖畫：中原文化的輝煌記憶[N];河南日報;2009年

10 湯惠生 劉五一;具茨山巖畫：中華文明可考的源頭[N];光明日報;2014年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 韓菡;具茨山原始巖刻符號與民居建筑基本模式關(guān)系研究[D];西安美術(shù)學(xué)院;2012年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 王靜;具茨山刻劃符號形體初探[D];鄭州大學(xué);2017年

2 陳建明;具茨山地區(qū)史前凹穴巖畫的文化解讀[D];中央民族大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號：1596017