本文選題：契丹小字墓志　切入點：得勒堅　出處：《社會科學(xué)輯刊》2015年06期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：契丹文字被稱為"世界之謎",釋讀困難重重,見解常常相左�！镀醯ば∽中掳l(fā)現(xiàn)資料釋讀問題》一書收有《蕭胡睹堇墓志銘考釋》。此志志主之名,一曰也先,二曰得勒堅。學(xué)界誤記也先為胡睹堇。本文以志主又名得勒堅稱此墓志,補說大致分為三類。一是記音釋義。《考釋》未記音或釋義可斟酌者,提出記音與釋義之見,如志主又名可記為得勒堅,志文對志主的稱謂須釋為賢者等等。二是釋義與史實核對。如志文提到奸臣耶律乙辛之事,正與《遼史》所言相合,不可釋為他義之類。三是關(guān)乎歷史故事。對鐘子期知音的故事、卞和獻璞的故事等作了必要的介紹。
[Abstract]:Qidan characters are called "riddles of the World", which are difficult to interpret and often differ in their opinions. The book "interpretation of newly discovered data in Qidan small characters" contains "A textual Research on the epitaph of Xiao Hu Chang's pansy." Second, Le Jian. The error-memorization of the academic circles is also Hu Ching-pansy first. This article insists that the epitaph is made by the author, also known as Dale, and the supplementary theory is roughly divided into three categories. One is to memorize the meaning of the sound. (< textual Research > > those who have not memorized the sound or have the discretion to interpret the meaning, put forward their opinions on the memorization and interpretation of the epitaph. For example, the name of the volunteer can also be recorded as Dele Jian, and the title of the volunteer must be interpreted as a sage. Second, the explanation is checked with the historical facts. If the Zhi Wen mentions the affair of the villain, Yeh Yi-shin, it coincides with what is said in the History of the Liao Dynasty. The third is about historical stories. It introduces the stories of Zhong Ziqi, Bian Bian and Xianpu.
【作者單位】： 遼寧社會科學(xué)院;
【分類號】：K877.45
，

本文編號：1573833