山東長清靈巖寺研究
發(fā)布時間:2018-02-10 12:33
本文關鍵詞: 靈巖寺 泰山 墓塔林 宗派信仰 葬制 出處:《山東大學》2012年碩士論文 論文類型:學位論文
【摘要】:本文主要圍繞靈巖寺墓塔林的時代性、藝術性及其與葬制、宗派間的關系展開討論。在前人研究成果及有關文獻和考古資料基礎上,本文首先探討了靈巖寺的選址與建造者,解決了寺院與泰山之內在關聯(lián)。寺院是僧侶活著時的生活修習之所,而墓塔則為其示寂后靈骨之所在,堪輿學在二者建造中也起了一定作用。其次,以時代為主線對該寺唐代到清代的墓塔進行對比分析,以突出不同時期墓塔的時代特征;此外還與同期其它地區(qū)的墓塔進行對比,以獲知該寺墓塔區(qū)別于其它墓塔的獨特建筑風格。第三,對墓塔與信仰流布、墓塔與葬制關系進行剖析,揭示靈巖寺的宗派信仰狀況,墓塔如何安葬僧人靈骨及墓塔形制成因,探索寺院墓塔背后所隱含的社會因素。第四,就文中所收集墓塔形制看,除了靈巖寺、神通寺塔林外,其他寺院的墓塔未見有覆鐘形塔、鼓型塔。通過分析其形制演變,了解了此類型墓塔成因。 本文的研究意義主要有五點:第一,本文就靈巖寺墓塔林展開研究此寺具有創(chuàng)新意義,還未有學者專門研究本寺塔林。第二,就靈巖寺而言,本文探討了寺院選址與泰山所載文化意義、風水運用之間的關系,是前人對本寺研究未曾關注的。第三,以時代順序結合寺院其他建筑重新看待塔林所呈現(xiàn)的藝術風格,使得人們從時序角度理解塔林到整個寺院的發(fā)展脈絡,突破前人學者只關注墓塔形制之定式。第四,關于覆鐘形、鼓型塔的形制探索,雖有人解釋了東南亞地區(qū)覆鐘形塔來源,但就其形制演變未有說明。而且,靈巖寺塔林中覆鐘形、鼓形塔形態(tài)極其象形,脫離覆缽本來形狀。因而,本文對其成因分析不同于前者。最后對塔林研究中所產的人的問題進一步思考,則有利于深入研究靈巖寺所反映的社會史問題。此外,附錄部分關于塔林中所有墓塔的形制描述為前人所未有。
[Abstract]:This paper mainly discusses the epoch, artistry and the relationship between Lingyan Temple and its burial system and sects. On the basis of previous research results and related documents and archaeological materials, this paper first discusses the location and construction of Lingyan Temple. It has solved the connection between monastery and Mount Tai. The temple is the living place of monks, and the tomb tower is where the spiritual bones of the monks are, and the study of kanghuao also plays a certain role in the construction of the two. Taking the times as the main line, this paper makes a comparative analysis of the tomb pagodas of the temple from the Tang Dynasty to the Qing Dynasty in order to highlight the characteristics of the times of the tomb pagodas in different periods, in addition to comparing them with those of other regions in the same period. In order to know the unique architectural style of the tomb pagoda in this temple, which is different from other pagodas. Thirdly, the relationship between the tomb pagoda and the spread of faith, the relationship between the tomb tower and the burial system is analyzed, and the status of sectarian faith in Lingyan Temple, how the tomb tower places the spiritual bones of the monk and the causes of the formation of the tomb pagoda are revealed. Explore the hidden social factors behind the pagoda of the temple. 4th, as far as the shape of the tomb tower collected in this article is concerned, except Lingyan Temple and Shantong Temple Tallinn, no bell shaped tower or drum tower has been found in other monasteries. By analyzing the evolution of its shape, Understand the origin of this type of tomb tower. The research significance of this paper mainly has five points: first, this article carries on the research on the Lingyan Temple tomb tower forest to have the innovation significance, has not the scholar specialized research this temple tower forest. Second, as far as Lingyan Temple is concerned, This paper probes into the relationship between the siting of the temple and the cultural significance and geomantic application of Mount Tai, which has not been paid attention to by the predecessors. Thirdly, the artistic style presented by Tallinn is reviewed in the order of the times combined with other buildings of the temple. So that people can understand the development of Tallinn to the whole temple from the angle of time sequence, and break through the former scholars' only paying attention to the form of tomb tower. 4th, about the shape of bell covered tower and drum tower, although some people have explained the origin of overlying bell tower in Southeast Asia. However, the evolution of its shape has not been explained. Moreover, in the Lingyan Temple Tallinn, the bell shape is covered, the drum shape is extremely pictoid, and the shape of the tower is detached from the original shape of the bowl. In this paper, the cause of formation is different from the former. Finally, further thinking about the people produced in the study of Tallinn is beneficial to the further study of the social history reflected by Lingyan Temple. The appendix describes the shape of all the pagodas in the Tallinn.
【學位授予單位】:山東大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2012
【分類號】:K878.6
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 范恩君;;談談泰山信仰的當代定位問題[J];中國道教;2009年03期
2 葉濤;靈巖寺辟支塔塔基浮雕與阿育王傳說[J];東南文化;2002年10期
3 羅廷振;西雙版納佛塔的類型及其源流[J];東南文化;1994年06期
4 馬銀華;;北宋文人筆下的齊魯佛寺景觀及其文化意蘊——淺議北宋文人游靈巖寺詩[J];東岳論叢;2010年07期
5 王公偉;泰山僧朗及其與帝王的關系[J];佛教文化;2005年01期
6 王麗心;佛寺與風水[J];佛學研究;1998年00期
7 黃國康;靈巖寺慧崇塔的修繕及其特點[J];古建園林技術;1996年01期
8 吳景山;石勁松;;《重修古剎靈巖寺碑記》校讀記[J];敦煌學輯刊;2010年03期
9 戚煥麗;;孔子與泰山文化[J];東岳論叢;2007年04期
10 胡繼高;;山東長清縣靈巖寺彩塑羅漢像的修復[J];考古;1983年11期
相關博士學位論文 前1條
1 王曉帆;中國西南邊境及相關地區(qū)南傳上座部佛塔研究[D];同濟大學;2006年
,本文編號:1500519
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/kgx/1500519.html